Replicated alternatives and the role of confusion, chasing, and regret in decisions from experience

The current paper explores choice among alternatives that can be classified into distinct classes. All the members of a particular class were ‘replicated alternatives’: they promised the same payoff distribution. Information to decision makers was limited to feedback concerning the realized (obtained and foregone) payoffs. Experiment 1 demonstrates that increasing the number of replicated alternatives creates confusion (which facilitates random choice) and changes the implications of the tendency to chase recent returns (i.e., select the alternative with the best recent outcomes). This effect, termed ‘confused chasing,’ facilitates risk seeking even when this behavior impairs expected earnings. Experiment 2 reveals that increasing the number of replicated alternatives can reduce (but does not eliminate) the tendency to underweight rare events. Experiment 3 shows that the relative importance of chasing and confusion is sensitive to the likelihood of realizing lower payoffs than the forgone payoffs. The main results are summarized with a simple model assuming that payoff sensitivity decreases with experienced regret. Copyright # 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  I. Erev,et al.  Small feedback‐based decisions and their limited correspondence to description‐based decisions , 2003 .

[2]  Peter Boatwright,et al.  Reducing Assortment: An Attribute-Based Approach , 2001 .

[3]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Social comparison after success and failure: Biased search for information consistent with a self-serving conclusion , 1985 .

[4]  George S. Mellman.  Bad News Travels Slowly: Size, Analyst Coverage, and the Profitability of Momentum Strategies , 2000 .

[5]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Individual differences in the response to forgone payoffs: an examination of high functioning drug abusers , 2005 .

[6]  David E. Bell,et al.  Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty , 1982, Oper. Res..

[7]  Ido Erev,et al.  Foregone with the Wind: Indirect Payoff Information and its Implications for Choice , 2006, Int. J. Game Theory.

[8]  E. Yechiam,et al.  The Role of Personal Experience in Contributing to Different Patterns of Response to Rare Terrorist Attacks , 2005 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[10]  I. Erev,et al.  On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. , 2005, Psychological review.

[11]  Gur Huberman,et al.  Offering vs. Choice in 401(k) Plans: Equity Exposure and Number of Funds , 2006 .

[12]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Time Pressure on Consumer Choice Deferral , 1999 .

[13]  I. Erev,et al.  Introduction to this Special Issue on Stochastic and Cognitive Models of Confidence , 1997 .

[14]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Effects of Quality and Quantity of Information on Decision Effectiveness , 1987 .

[15]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Ratings-Based and Choice-Based Conjoint Models , 1992 .

[16]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors , 2000 .

[17]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[18]  K. Arrow.  Rational Choice Functions and Orderings1 , 1959 .

[19]  Morgan Kelly.  All their eggs in one basket: Portfolio diversification of US households , 1995 .

[20]  R. Mehra,et al.  THE EQUITY PREMIUM A Puzzle , 1985 .

[21]  J. Stein,et al.  A Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading and Overreaction in Asset Markets , 1997 .

[22]  M. Blume,et al.  The Asset Structure of Individual Portfolios and Some Implications for Utility Functions , 1975 .

[23]  M. Allais.  Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[24]  Narasimhan Jegadeesh,et al.  Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency , 1993 .

[25]  K. Rouwenhorst,et al.  International Momentum Strategies , 1997 .

[26]  C. B. Ferster,et al.  Schedules of reinforcement , 1957 .

[27]  Terence Lim,et al.  Bad News Travels Slowly: Size, Analyst Coverage and the Profitability of Momentum Strategies , 1998 .

[28]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[29]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[31]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load , 1974 .

[32]  L. Guo-jie.  Production and Allocation of Social Wealth , 2004 .

[33]  B. Kahn,et al.  Variety for sale: Mass customization or mass confusion? , 1998 .

[34]  Ido Erev,et al.  Generality, repetition, and the role of descriptive learning models , 2005 .

[35]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  The effect of foregone payoffs on underweighting small probability events , 2006 .

[36]  R. Dhar.  Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option , 1997 .

[37]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Assessing Biases in Measuring Decision Effectiveness and Information Overload , 1989 .

[38]  John T. Gourville,et al.  Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires , 2005 .

[39]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[40]  Michael Tsiros,et al.  Effect of Regret on Post-choice Valuation: The Case of More Than Two Alternatives. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[41]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[42]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: An Experimental Test , 1997 .

[43]  A. Chernev.  When More Is Less and Less Is More: the Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice This Research Argues That Choices from Different Size Assort- Ments Are a Function of the Degree to Which Consumers Have , 2022 .

[44]  J. Nash.  THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[45]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[46]  R. Sugden,et al.  Regret Theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty Review of Economic Studies , 1982 .

[47]  William M. Goldstein,et al.  The relative importance of relative importance: Inferring other people's preferences from relative importance ratings and previous decisions , 1992 .

[48]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[49]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[50]  R. Thaler,et al.  Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Saving Plans , 2001 .

[51]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .