Compressed Sensing of Monostatic and Multistatic SAR

In this letter, we study the impact of compressed data collections from a synthetic aperture radar (SAR) sensor on the reconstruction quality of a scene of interest. Different monostatic and multistatic SAR measurement configurations produce different Fourier sampling patterns. These patterns reflect different spectral and spatial diversity tradeoffs that must be made during task planning. Compressed sensing theory argues that the mutual coherence of the measurement probes is related to the reconstruction performance of sparse domains. With this motivation, we propose a closely related t%-average mutual coherence parameter as a sensing configuration quality parameter and examine its relationship to the reconstruction behavior of various monostatic and ultranarrow-band multistatic configurations. We investigate how this easily computed metric is related to SAR reconstruction quality.

[1]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimally sparse representation in general (nonorthogonal) dictionaries via ℓ1 minimization , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Ivana Stojanovic,et al.  Joint space aspect reconstruction of wide-angle SAR exploiting sparsity , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  R. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Radar Imaging , 2007, 2007 IEEE Radar Conference.

[5]  Xiaoming Huo,et al.  Uncertainty principles and ideal atomic decomposition , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  T. Blumensath,et al.  Fast Encoding of Synthetic Aperture Radar Raw Data using Compressed Sensing , 2007, 2007 IEEE/SP 14th Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing.

[7]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimized Projections for Compressed Sensing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Compressed Synthetic Aperture Radar , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[9]  LeRoy A. Gorham,et al.  A challenge problem for SAR change detection and data compression , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  High-Resolution Radar via Compressed Sensing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Braham Himed,et al.  Tomography of moving targets (TMT) , 2001, Remote Sensing.

[13]  S. Frick,et al.  Compressed Sensing , 2014, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[14]  Moeness G. Amin,et al.  Compressed sensing technique for high-resolution radar imaging , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Charles V. Jakowatz,et al.  Spotlight-Mode Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Signal Processing Approach , 1996 .

[16]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  E. Candès,et al.  Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling , 2006, math/0611957.

[18]  W. Clem Karl,et al.  Compressed sensing of mono-static and multi-static SAR , 2009, Defense + Commercial Sensing.