A structured multi-stakeholder learning process for Sustainable Land Management.

There are many, often competing, options for Sustainable Land Management (SLM). Each must be assessed - and sometimes negotiated - prior to implementation. Participatory, multi-stakeholder approaches to identification and selection of SLM options are increasingly popular, often motivated by social learning and empowerment goals. Yet there are few practical tools for facilitating processes in which land managers may share, select, and decide on the most appropriate SLM options. The research presented here aims to close the gap between the theory and the practice of stakeholder participation/learning in SLM decision-making processes. The paper describes a three-part participatory methodology for selecting SLM options that was tested in 14 desertification-prone study sites within the EU-DESIRE project. Cross-site analysis and in-depth evaluation of the Moroccan and Portuguese sites were used to evaluate how well the proposed process facilitated stakeholder learning and selection of appropriate SLM options for local implementation. The structured nature of the process - starting with SLM goal setting - was found to facilitate mutual understanding and collaboration between stakeholders. The deliberation process led to a high degree of consensus over the outcome and, though not an initial aim, it fostered social learning in many cases. This solution-oriented methodology is applicable in a wide range of contexts and may be implemented with limited time and resources.

[1]  E. Garmendia,et al.  Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe , 2010 .

[2]  Hans Hurni,et al.  Assessing sustainable land management (SLM) , 2000 .

[3]  Jeffrey E. Herrick,et al.  Experiences in monitoring and assessment of sustainable land management , 2011 .

[4]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Sustainability Learning in Natural Resource Use and Management , 2007 .

[5]  H. Liniger,et al.  Sustainable land management in practice: guidelines and best practices for Sub-Saharan Africa , 2011 .

[6]  Peter R. Robichaud,et al.  Fire Effects on Soil , 2009 .

[7]  Keith Douglass Warner,et al.  Agroecology as Participatory Science , 2008 .

[8]  António Vieira,et al.  Fire effects on soil properties: proceedings of the 3rd international meeting of fire effects on soil properties , 2011 .

[9]  David Niemeijer,et al.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Desertification Synthesis , 2005 .

[10]  Ernst Gabathuler,et al.  Reshaping Rural Extension: Learning for Sustainability (LforS): An Integrative and Learning-Based Advisory Approach for Rural Extension with Small-Scale Farmers , 2011 .

[11]  Gudrun Schwilch,et al.  Decision support for selecting SLM technologies with stakeholders , 2012 .

[12]  D. Roux,et al.  Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs , 2010 .

[13]  B. Kiteme,et al.  Researchers' roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal , 2010 .

[14]  Christo Fabricius,et al.  Monitoring in adaptive co-management: Toward a learning based approach. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  Kristen Purcell,et al.  Public Participation and the Environment: Do We Know What Works? , 1999 .

[16]  N. G. Roling,et al.  A new practice: facilitating sustainable agriculture. , 1998 .

[17]  D. Decker,et al.  Social Learning for Collaborative Natural Resource Management , 2003 .

[18]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management , 2008 .

[19]  Mark R. Stevens,et al.  Public Participation in Local Government Review of Development Proposals in Hazardous Locations: Does it Matter, and What Do Local Government Planners Have to Do with It? , 2010, Environmental management.

[20]  M. Hemmati.  Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability: Beyond Deadlock and Conflict , 2002 .

[21]  Tharsi Taillieu,et al.  Multi‐party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management , 2004 .

[22]  H.G.M. van den Elsen,et al.  DESIRE: desertification mitigation and remediation of land: a global approach for local solutions , 2008 .

[23]  J. Gonsalves,et al.  Participatory research and development for sustainable agriculture and natural resource management , 2005 .

[24]  G. Walker,et al.  Shared Visions, Unholy Alliances: Power, Governance and Deliberative Processes in Local Transport Planning , 2005 .

[25]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Deliberative Multicriteria Evaluation , 2006 .

[26]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning , 2009 .

[27]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[28]  Hanspeter Liniger,et al.  Where the land is greener : case studies and analysis of soil and water conservation initiatives worldwide , 2007 .

[29]  Meredith Wray,et al.  Adopting and implementing a transactive approach to sustainable tourism planning: translating theory into practice , 2011 .

[30]  Hanspeter Liniger,et al.  Cross‐scale monitoring and assessment of land degradation and sustainable land management: A methodological framework for knowledge management , 2011 .

[31]  Wendy Proctor,et al.  Structuring stakeholder participation in New Zealand's water resource governance , 2011 .

[32]  Erick C.M. Fernandes,et al.  Sustainable land management : challenges, opportunities, and trade-offs , 2006 .

[33]  M. Mortimore,et al.  Monitoring and assessing the influence of social, economic and policy factors on sustainable land management in drylands , 2011 .

[34]  Gudrun Schwilch,et al.  Appraising and selecting conservation measures to mitigate desertification and land degradation based on stakeholder participation and global best practices , 2009 .

[35]  Ian Scoones,et al.  Global engagements with global assessments : the case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) , 2008 .

[36]  Lindsay C. Stringer,et al.  Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation: Institutional, financial, legal and science‐policy challenges and solutions , 2011 .

[37]  J. Arvai,et al.  Five propositions for improving decision making about the environment in developing communities: insights from the decision sciences. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  Andreas Kläy,et al.  Vom Wissenstransfer zum Wissensaustausch: Neue Impulse für den Boden- und Biodiversitätsschutz in der Landwirtschaft , 2003 .

[39]  N. Röling,et al.  Wheelbarrows full of frogs: social learning in rural resource management : international research and reflections , 2002 .

[40]  Selim Kapur,et al.  What We Know About the Saga of Land Degradation and How to Deal with It , 2010 .

[41]  A. Scott.  Focussing in on focus groups: Effective participative tools or cheap fixes for land use policy? , 2011 .

[42]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  Bradley D. Parrish,et al.  What is social learning , 2010 .

[44]  M. Reed,et al.  Implementing the UNCCD: Participatory challenges , 2007 .

[45]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[46]  Flurina Schneider,et al.  Social Learning Processes in Swiss Soil Protection—The ‘From Farmer - To Farmer’ Project , 2009 .

[47]  Urs Wiesmann,et al.  “It was Hard to Come to Mutual Understanding …”—The Multidimensionality of Social Learning Processes Concerned with Sustainable Natural Resource Use in India, Africa and Latin America , 2006 .

[48]  N. Röling,et al.  Social learning for solving complex problems: a promising solution or wishful thinking? A case study of multi-actor negotiation for the integrated management and sustainable use of the Drentsche Aa area in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[49]  Konrad Meyer,et al.  Soils on the global agenda. Developing international mechanisms for sustainable land management , 2006 .

[50]  Nick Wates.  The Community Planning Handbook : How People Can Shape Their Cities, Towns and Villages in Any Part of the World , 2014 .

[51]  Urs Wiesmann,et al.  Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: The role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali , 2007 .

[52]  J. Innes.  Planning Through Consensus Building: A New View of the Comprehensive Planning Ideal , 1996 .

[53]  Tim Oxley,et al.  Integrated modelling and decision-support tools: a Mediterranean example , 2004, Environ. Model. Softw..

[54]  Derek R. Armitage,et al.  Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning , 2008 .