Domestic Information and Communication Technologies and Subject-Object Relations: Gender, Identity, and Family Life

This paper examines the place of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in the contemporary Western home and the role these technologies play in the affective shaping and constitution of gender, identity, and intersubjective family relations. In particular, we focus on the subject-object relations between people and technological artefacts to analyse how these associations contribute to the construction of domestic identities, facilitate ICT use, and transgress neatly drawn gendered difference. Involving Melbourne households as collaborators in our research through the use of a “Domestic Probes” methodology, we focus our case study on one suburban family - the Lukics - to support our claims that subject- object relations constitute both subjects and objects.1 Our contribution to family studies is to suggest that close attention to the network of associations between subjects and objects, people and technologies, can enhance an understanding of the entwining of domestic identities and technologies in the home.

[1]  Brendan Walker,et al.  Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty , 2004, INTR.

[2]  Debby Hindus,et al.  The Importance of Homes in Technology Research , 1999, CoBuild.

[3]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Notes towards an ethnography of domestic technology , 2002, DIS '02.

[4]  The Sociology of Associations in Family Research and Practice , 2006 .

[5]  Rosalind Gill.  Technofeminism , 2005 .

[6]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The meaning of things: Coding categories and definitions , 1981 .

[8]  Kristen Haring,et al.  The "Freer Men" of Ham Radio: How a Technical Hobby Provided Social and Spatial Distance , 2003 .

[9]  Michael Arnold,et al.  The Connected Home: probing the effects and affects of domesticated ICTs , 2004 .

[10]  Elaine Lally,et al.  At Home With Computers , 2020 .

[11]  Fergus Murray.  A separate reality: science, technology and Masculinity , 1994 .

[12]  Dale Spender,et al.  Nattering on the Net: Women, Power and Cyberspace , 1996 .

[13]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[14]  Lana F. Rakow.  Women making meaning : new feminist directions in communication , 1992 .

[15]  V. Frissen.  Gender is Calling: Some Reflections on Past, Present and Future Uses of the Telephone , 2018, The Gender-Technology Relation.

[16]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals , 2000, CHI.

[17]  D. Morley.  Family Television: Cultural Power and Domestic Leisure , 1986 .

[18]  Cynthia Cockburn,et al.  Bringing Technology Home: Gender and Technology in a Changing Europe , 1994 .

[19]  D. Morley.  Home Territories: Media, Mobility and Identity , 2000 .

[20]  Naomi Wolf.  The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women , 1990 .

[21]  Raewyn Connell,et al.  Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. , 1991 .

[22]  Alladi Venkatesh,et al.  Computers and other interactive technologies for the home , 1996, CACM.

[23]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[24]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies , 2004 .

[25]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[26]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .