Cervical Pedicle Screws: Conventional Versus Computer-Assisted Placement of Cannulated Screws

Study Design. Prospective clinical study with postoperative radiologic control of pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine. Objectives. To evaluate whether cervical pedicle screws can be placed safely in a conventional technique when using cannulated screws and separate stab incisions. Also, to evaluate if accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement can be improved using a computer-assisted surgery (CAS) system (VectorVision®; BrainLAB AG, Heimstetten, Germany). Summary of Background Data. Pedicle screws are rarely used in the cervical spine compared to the use in lumbar and thoracic spine. The main reason is probably the potential risk of iatrogenic damage to the spinal cord, nerve roots, or vertebral artery caused by screw misplacement as well as the more demanding technique of pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine. Methods. A total of 52 consecutive patients with posterior cervical or cervicothoracic instrumentations using pedicle screws were evaluated prospectively. For the first 20 patients, 93 pedicle screws were implanted using the conventional technique with the image intensifier in the lateral view, and for the next 32 patients (167 screws), a CAS system was additionally used. For registration of the vertebra, surface-matching algorithms were used. For evaluation of screw placement, postoperative computerized tomography with multiplanar reconstructions in the screw axis was performed for each screw. Results. No implant-related complications were observed. No neurologic or vascular complications were found related to pedicle screws. The rate of pedicle perforations was 8.6% (8 screws) in the conventional group and 3.0% (5 screws) in the CAS group, and in all cases, less than 2-mm displacement. None of the screws with pedicle perforation had to be revised as a result of nonsufficient biomechanical stability or compression of neural/vascular structures. Conclusions. Transpedicular screws in the cervical spine and cervicothoracic junction can be applied safely and with high accuracy in a conventional technique. Cannulated screws and the use of separate stab incisions from C3–C6 with a trocar system allow for reduced screw misplacement rates. The CAS system leads to significantly reduced screw misplacement rates. Therefore, because of the potential risk of injury to the vertebral artery and neural elements, the use of a CAS system seems to be beneficial, especially for pedicle instrumentation C3–C6.

[1]  K. Kaneda,et al.  Pedicle Screw Fixation for Nontraumatic Lesions of the Cervical Spine , 1997, Spine.

[2]  P. Cinquin,et al.  Computer-assisted spine surgery: a technique for accurate transpedicular screw fixation using CT data and a 3-D optical localizer. , 1995, Journal of image guided surgery.

[3]  A Hamadeh,et al.  Computer Assisted Spine Surgery , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  M. Richter,et al.  Computer-assisted surgery in posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine: an in-vitro feasibility study , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[5]  G H Barnett,et al.  Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  K. Kaneda,et al.  A cineradiographic study on the lumbar disc deformation during flexion and extension of the trunk. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  S R Garfin,et al.  Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  L. Claes,et al.  Pedicle Screws Enhance Primary Stability in Multilevel Cervical Corpectomies: Biomechanical In Vitro Comparison of Different Implants Including Constrained and Nonconstrained Posterior Instumentations , 2003, Spine.

[9]  H Labelle,et al.  Computer‐Assisted Pedicle Screw Fixation‐ A Feasibility Study , 1995, Spine.

[10]  D. Silcox,et al.  Cervical Pedicle Screws Versus Lateral Mass Screws: Anatomic Feasibility and Biomechanical Comparison , 1997, Spine.

[11]  C. Edwards,et al.  Cervical Pedicle Screws: Comparative Accuracy of Two Insertion Techniques , 2000, Spine.

[12]  小谷 善久 Biomechanical analysis of cervical stabilization systems : an assessment of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine , 1995 .

[13]  Frank Langlotz,et al.  Image‐Guided Insertion of Transpedicular Screws: A Laboratory Set‐Up , 1995, Spine.

[14]  A. Alho,et al.  Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion: A prospective CT study in 30 low back patients , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[15]  E. Sim,et al.  Location of transpedicular screws for fixation of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine. Computed tomography of 45 fracture cases. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[16]  T. Albert,et al.  Transpedicle screw fixation of the cervical spine. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  S. Gertzbein,et al.  Accuracy of Pedicular Screw Placement In Vivo , 1990, Spine.

[18]  Manabu Ito,et al.  Complications of Pedicle Screw Fixation in Reconstructive Surgery of the Cervical Spine , 2000, Spine.

[19]  F. Langlotz,et al.  Accuracy of Computer‐Assisted Pedicle Screw Placement: An In Vivo Computed Tomography Analysis , 1997, Spine.

[20]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Anatomic Consideration of C2 Pedicle Screw Placement , 1996, Spine.

[21]  T. Albert,et al.  Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. , 2000, Spine.

[22]  F. Kummer,et al.  Flexion Failure of Posterior Cervical Lateral Mass Screws: Influence of Insertion Technique and Position , 1996, Spine.

[23]  D P McGowan,et al.  Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. , 1990, Spine.

[24]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Morphometric Evaluation of Lower Cervical Pedicle and Its Projection , 1997, Spine.

[25]  K. Takaoka,et al.  Accurate pedicle screw insertion under the control of a computer-assisted image guiding system: Laboratory test and clinical study , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[26]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Stabilization Systems: An Assessment of Transpedicular Screw Fixation in the Cervical Spine , 1994, Spine.

[27]  L Zamorano,et al.  Image-guided computer-assisted spine surgery: a pilot study on pedicle screw fixation. , 1996, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[28]  K. Kaneda,et al.  Indirect posterior reduction and fusion of the traumatic herniated disc by using a cervical pedicle screw system. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[29]  F. Langlotz,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a system for precision enhancement in spine surgery. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[30]  L. Nolte,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Insertion With Computer-Assisted Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Trial of 30 Patients , 1997, Spine.

[31]  C Ozdoba,et al.  Planning and insertion of pedicle screws with computer assistance. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[32]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Spinal Pedicle Fixation: Reliability and Validity of Roentgenogram-Based Assessment and Surgical Factors on Successful Screw Placement , 1988, Spine.

[33]  N. Glossop,et al.  Computer‐Aided Pedicle Screw Placement Using Frameless Stereotaxis , 1996, Spine.

[34]  P Merloz,et al.  Pedicle Screw Placement Using Image Guided Techniques , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[35]  F Langlotz,et al.  Image‐Guided Insertion of Transpedicular Screws: A Laboratory Set‐Up , 1995, Spine.

[36]  M H Krag,et al.  Hole Preparation Techniques for Transpedicle Screws Effect on Pull‐Out Strength from Human Cadaveric Vertebrae , 1991, Spine.

[37]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Anatomic Consideration of Transpedicular Screw Placement in the Cervical Spine: An Analysis of Two Approaches , 1996, Spine.