The impact of (unconditional) cash transfers on school enrollment: Evidence from Ecuador

This paper presents evidence about the impact on school enrollment of a program in Ecuador that gives cash transfers to the 40 percent poorest families. The evaluation design consists of a randomized experiment for families around the first quintile of the poverty index and of a regression discontinuity design for families around the second quintile of this index, which is the program’s eligibility threshold. This allows us to compare results from two different credible identification methods, and to investigate whether the impact varies with families’ poverty level. Around the first quintile of the poverty index the impact is positive while it is equal to zero around the second quintile. This suggests that for the poorest families the program lifts a credit constraint while this is not the case for families close to the eligibility threshold.

[1]  John Hoddinott,et al.  Must Conditional Cash Transfer Programs be Conditioned to be Effective? The Impact of Conditioning Transfers on School Enrollment in Mexico , 2009 .

[2]  Norbert Schady,et al.  Cash Transfers, Conditions, and School Enrollment in Ecuador , 2008 .

[3]  S. Younger,et al.  Transfer payments, mothers' income and child health in ecuador , 2007 .

[4]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Assessing the Impact of a School Subsidy Program in Mexico: Using a Social Experiment to Validate a Dynamic Behavioral Model of Child Schooling and Fertility. , 2006, The American economic review.

[5]  E. Fitzsimons,et al.  Child Education and Work Choices in the Presence of a Conditional Cash Transfer Programme in Rural Colombia , 2006 .

[6]  E. Duflo,et al.  Monitoring Works: Getting Teachers to Come to School , 2005 .

[7]  D. Coady,et al.  The Cost of Poverty Alleviation Transfer Programs: A Comparative Analysis of Three Programs in Latin America , 2004 .

[8]  R. Vos,et al.  Meeting the millennium development goal in education : a cost-effectiveness analysis for Ecuador , 2004 .

[9]  S. Duryea,et al.  The Effect of Conditional Transfers on School Performance and Child Labor: Evidence from an Ex-Post Impact Evaluation in Costa Rica , 2004 .

[10]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Using a Social Experiment to Validate a Dynamic Behavioral Model of Child Schooling and Fertility: Assessing the Impact of a School Subsidy Program in Mexico , 2003 .

[11]  Laura B. Rawlings,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Lessons from Latin America , 2003 .

[12]  F. Bourguignon,et al.  Conditional cash transfers, schooling, and child labor : micro-simulating Brazil's bolsa escola program , 2003 .

[13]  T. Schultz.  School Subsidies for the Poor: Evaluating the Mexican Progresa Poverty Program , 2001 .

[14]  J. Angrist.  Conditional Independence in Sample Selection Models , 1997 .

[15]  D. Rubin,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables: Rejoinder , 1996 .

[16]  D. Campbell,et al.  Regression-Discontinuity Analysis: An Alternative to the Ex-Post Facto Experiment , 1960 .

[17]  A. Janvry,et al.  Making Conditional Cash Transfer Programs More Efficient: Designing for Maximum Effect of the Conditionality , 2006 .

[18]  J. Maluccio,et al.  Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program: the Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social , 2004 .