Locomotor Ability and Wariness in Yellow‐Bellied Marmots

Animals employ a variety of behaviors to reduce or manage predation risk. Often, these are studied in isolation, but selection may act on packages of behavior that are referred to as behavioral syndromes. We focused on yellow-bellied marmots (Marmota flaviventris) and examined three commonly studied antipredator behaviors. We fitted general linear models to explain variation in maximum running speed, time allocated to vigilance and foraging during bouts of foraging, and flight initiation distance (FID). Marmot maximum running speed was influenced by the substrate run across; marmots ran fastest across dirt or low vegetation and slowest across stones or talus. Incline and several other variables shown to affect running speed in other marmot species failed to explain significant variation in yellow-bellied marmots. From these results we expected marmots to be sensitive to substrate while foraging, but insensitive to incline. However, time allocated to foraging was affected by incline but not by substrate. In bouts of foraging observed in different habitats, and on different inclines, more time was allocated to foraging and less to vigilance on steep slopes and less on level ground. Substrate influenced FID. Marmots in tall vegetation were less tolerant of an approaching person than were those in shorter vegetation. Finally, we found significant correlations between the residuals from the maximum running speed model and the residuals from the time allocated to vigilance and foraging models. We found a tendency for marmots that ran slower than predicted to be less vigilant while foraging. We also found that relatively slow marmots engaged in more active foraging and less vigilance during foraging bouts. This finding suggests a 'locomotor ability-wariness while foraging' syndrome. It also suggests that vulnerable individuals minimize their exposure while foraging.

[1]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[2]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  I. Vine,et al.  Risk of visual detection and pursuitby a predator and the selective advantage of flocking behaviour. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  C. R. Taylor,et al.  Running Up and Down Hills: Some Consequences of Size , 1972, Science.

[6]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Effects of hippocampal lesions on the rat's reaction to a cat. , 1972, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology.

[7]  H. Pulliam,et al.  On the advantages of flocking. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Pulliam Hr,et al.  On the advantages of flocking , 1973 .

[9]  K. Armitage Social behavior and population dynamics of marmots , 1975 .

[10]  W. Atchley,et al.  Statistical Properties of Ratios. I. Empirical Results , 1976 .

[11]  Predation by Badger on Yellow-Bellied Marmot in Colorado , 1977 .

[12]  S. Gould,et al.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  D. Leger,et al.  Behavioral ecology of time allocation in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi): Microhabitat effects. , 1983 .

[14]  E. Werner,et al.  THE ONTOGENETIC NICHE AND SPECIES INTERACTIONS IN SIZE-STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 1984 .

[15]  P. Moore,et al.  Foraging and Predation Risk in Yellow-Bellied Marmots , 1986 .

[16]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  The Economics of Fleeing from Predators , 1986 .

[17]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .

[18]  K. Armitage Social dynamics of mammals: Reproductive success, kinship and individual fitness. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  S. H. Jenkins,et al.  Sex and age affect vulnerability of desert rodents to owl predation , 1987 .

[20]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Maximal Running Speeds of Bipedal and Quadrupedal Rodents , 1988 .

[21]  T. Caraco,et al.  Effects of predation hazard on foraging "constraints": patch-use strategies in grey squirrels , 1988 .

[22]  T. Schoener On Testing the MacArthur-Wilson Model with Data on Rates , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[23]  K. Armitage Chapter 7 – RESOURCES AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF GROUND-DWELLING SQUIRRELS , 1988 .

[24]  Running Speed and Body Mass in Belding's Ground Squirrels , 1989 .

[25]  M. Elgar,et al.  PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1989, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[26]  L. Dill,et al.  The influence of distance to refuge on flight initiation distance in the gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) , 1989 .

[27]  E. Brodie,et al.  Genetic correlations between morphology and antipredator behaviour in natural populations of the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides , 1989, Nature.

[28]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[29]  J. Losos,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF FORM AND FUNCTION: MORPHOLOGY AND LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE IN WEST INDIAN ANOLIS LIZARDS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  M. Cassini,et al.  Foraging under predation risk in the wild guinea pig Cavia aperea , 1991 .

[31]  D. V. Vuren Yellow-bellied Marmots as Prey of Coyotes , 1991 .

[32]  D. Blumstein MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF GOLDEN MARMOT MAXIMUM RUNNING SPEED: A NEW METHOD TO STUDY MRS IN THE FIELD' , 1992 .

[33]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Patch use predation risk. II : A test with fox squirrels, Sciurus niger , 1992 .

[34]  S. Riechert,et al.  A test for correlations among fitness-linked behavioural traits in the spider Agelenopsis aperta (Araneae, Agelenidae) , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  M. Bowers,et al.  Variation in giving-up densities of foraging chipmunks (Tamias striatus) and squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) , 1993 .

[36]  Andreas G. Lazari,et al.  The ontogeny of individuality in black-tailed prairie dogs, Cynomys ludovicianus , 1994 .

[37]  A. Magurran,et al.  Predator Inspection Behaviour Covaries With Schooling Tendency Amongst Wild Guppy, Poecilia Reticulata, Populations in Trinidad , 1994 .

[38]  J. Endler Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  Roger Catchpole,et al.  Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution , 1995 .

[40]  J. Losos,et al.  The effect of perch diameter on escape behaviour of Anolis lizards : laboratory predictions and field tests , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[41]  K. Armitage,et al.  Population time budget for the yellow-bellied marmot , 1996 .

[42]  D. Blumstein How Much Does Social Group Size Influence Golden Marmot Vigilance , 1996 .

[43]  D. Kramer,et al.  The influence of distance to burrow on flight initiation distance in the woodchuck, Marmota monax , 1996 .

[44]  Age differences in the response of California ground Squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) to avian and mammalian predators. , 1997, Journal of comparative psychology.

[45]  D. Blanchard Stimulus, environmental, and pharmacological control of defensive behaviors. , 1997 .

[46]  D. Leger,et al.  Artificial visual obstruction, antipredator vigilance, and predator detection in the thirteen-lined ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus) , 1997 .

[47]  B. V. Horne,et al.  Influence of habitat on behavior of townsend's ground squirrels (Spermophilus townsendii) , 1998 .

[48]  K. Armitage,et al.  Life history consequences of social complexity a comparative study of ground-dwelling sciurids , 1998 .

[49]  J. Byers American Pronghorn: Social Adaptations and the Ghosts of Predators Past , 1998 .

[50]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Back to the basics of antipredatory vigilance: can nonvigilant animals detect attack? , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  J. Losos,et al.  Do Lizards Avoid Habitats in Which Performance Is Submaximal? The Relationship between Sprinting Capabilities and Structural Habitat Use in Caribbean Anoles , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[52]  J. Capitanio Personality dimensions in adult male rhesus macaques: Prediction of behaviors across time and situation , 1999, American journal of primatology.

[53]  M. Low,et al.  Dopamine D4 Receptor-Knock-Out Mice Exhibit Reduced Exploration of Novel Stimuli , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[54]  R Hen,et al.  5-HT1B Receptor Knock-Out Mice Exhibit Increased Exploratory Activity and Enhanced Spatial Memory Performance in the Morris Water Maze , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  A. Hedrick Crickets with extravagant mating songs compensate for predation risk with extra caution , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  A. Kamil,et al.  The cost of limited attention in blue jays , 2000 .

[57]  G. Griebel,et al.  Mouse defensive behaviors: pharmacological and behavioral assays for anxiety and panic , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[58]  Pilar López,et al.  Camouflage and escape decisions in the common chameleon Chamaeleo chamaeleon , 2001 .

[59]  D. V. Vuren Predation on Yellow-bellied Marmots (Marmota flaviventris) , 2001 .

[60]  S. Gosling From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[61]  Janice C. Daniel,et al.  Isolation from mammalian predators differentially affects two congeners , 2002 .

[62]  Laurie M. Kauffman,et al.  Are vigilance, risk from avian predators and group size consequences of habitat structure? a comparison of three species of squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedii, S. boliviensis, and S. sciureus) , 2003 .

[63]  A. Sih,et al.  Behavioural correlations across situations and the evolution of antipredator behaviour in a sunfish–salamander system , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[64]  Menna E. Jones,et al.  Structurally complex habitat and sensory adaptations mediate the behavioural responses of a desert rodent to an indirect cue for increased predation risk , 2003 .

[65]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Do fences protect birds from human disturbance , 2003 .

[66]  D. Irschick Measuring Performance in Nature: Implications for Studies of Fitness Within Populations1 , 2003, Integrative and comparative biology.

[67]  D. Blumstein Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance , 2003 .

[68]  J. Melville,et al.  Evolutionary correlations between escape behaviour and performance ability in eight species of snow skinks (Niveoscincus: Lygosominae) from Tasmania , 2003 .

[69]  A. Sih,et al.  Behavioral Syndromes: An Integrative Overview , 2004, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[70]  D. Schluter,et al.  The Genetic Architecture of Parallel Armor Plate Reduction in Threespine Sticklebacks , 2004, PLoS biology.

[71]  W. Cooper,et al.  Locomotor impairment and defense in gravid lizards (Eumeces laticeps): behavioral shift in activity may offset costs of reproduction in an active forager , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[72]  L. Dill Distance-to-cover and the escape decisions of an African cichlid fish, Melanochromis chipokae , 1990, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[73]  D. Blumstein,et al.  DO INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES INFLUENCE FLIGHT INITIATION DISTANCE? , 2004 .

[74]  Michael M. Delm Vigilance for predators: detection and dilution effects , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[75]  C. Boake Repeatability: Its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior , 1989, Evolutionary Ecology.