Understanding engineering transfer students: Demographic characteristics and educational outcomes

Transfer students make up a significant share of engineering college graduates, yet their persistence is seldom studied, largely because of the lack of longitudinal data. This analysis used longitudinal data from 11 universities enrolling large numbers of engineering students to investigate the demographic characteristics and educational outcomes of transfer students in engineering relative to non-transfers. We find that students who transfer to four-year engineering programs are more likely to come from under-represented minority groups (URMs) and less likely to be women, although both groups are over-represented at two-year colleges. The findings confirm existing research indicating that, on average, non-transfers outperform transfer students, and non-URMs outperform URMs. But we also find that URM transfers, and especially Black transfers, are no less successful than nontransfer students - indicating that the transfer pathway is an effective bridge to a four-year degree. This is partly true for women transfers who do as well as men but are outperformed by women non-transfers. Finally, we find significant variation in outcomes between full- and part-time students, which may be driving the observed differences by transfer status. Our results should inform debates regarding the efficacy of the transfer pathway in engineering, particularly for women and URMs.

[1]  Alexander C. McCormick Swirling and Double-Dipping: New Patterns of Student Attendance and Their Implications for Higher Education. , 2003 .

[2]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  WHO'S PERSISTING IN ENGINEERING? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEMALE AND MALE ASIAN, BLACK, HISPANIC, NATIVE AMERICAN, AND WHITE STUDENTS , 2009 .

[3]  Terry T. Ishitani How Do Transfers Survive after “Transfer Shock”? A Longitudinal Study of Transfer Student Departure at a Four-Year Institution , 2008 .

[4]  S. R. Harper,et al.  Black Male Student Success in Higher Education: A Report from the National Black Male College Achievement Study , 2012 .

[5]  Stephen R. Porter Assessing Transfer and First-Time Freshmen Student Performance. , 2003 .

[6]  Jeffrey Brainard Community Colleges Seen as Source of Engineers. , 2008 .

[7]  T Melguizo,et al.  National estimates of transfer access and bachelor’s degree attainment at four-year colleges and universities. , 2006 .

[8]  J. Conrad Glass Jr,et al.  ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRANSFER STUDENTS AND "NATIVE" STUDENTS AT A LARGE STATE UNIVERSITY , 2002 .

[9]  Mariana Alfonso,et al.  The impact of community college attendance on baccalaureate attainment , 2006 .

[10]  Catherine Mobley,et al.  Work in progress: Transfer students in engineering: A qualitative study of pathways and persistence , 2012, 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings.

[11]  Nathaniel J. Bray,et al.  How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research (review) , 2006, The Journal of General Education.