Interchangeability between real and three-dimensional simulated lung tumors in computed tomography: an interalgorithm volumetry study

Abstract. Using hybrid datasets consisting of patient-derived computed tomography (CT) images with digitally inserted computational tumors, we establish volumetric interchangeability between real and computational lung tumors in CT. Pathologically-confirmed malignancies from 30 thoracic patient cases from the RIDER database were modeled. Tumors were either isolated or attached to lung structures. Patient images were acquired on one of two CT scanner models (Lightspeed 16 or VCT; GE Healthcare) using standard chest protocol. Real tumors were segmented and used to inform the size and shape of simulated tumors. Simulated tumors developed in Duke Lesion Tool (Duke University) were inserted using a validated image-domain insertion program. Four readers performed volume measurements using three commercial segmentation tools. We compared the volume estimation performance of segmentation tools between real tumors in actual patient CT images and corresponding simulated tumors virtually inserted into the same patient images (i.e., hybrid datasets). Comparisons involved (1) direct assessment of measured volumes and the standard deviation between simulated and real tumors across readers and tools, respectively, (2) multivariate analysis, involving segmentation tools, readers, tumor shape, and attachment, and (3) effect of local tumor environment on volume measurement. Volume comparison showed consistent trends (9% volumetric difference) between real and simulated tumors across all segmentation tools, readers, shapes, and attachments. Across all cases, readers, and segmentation tools, an intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99 indicates that simulated tumors correlated strongly with real tumors (p  =  0.95). In addition, the impact of the local tumor environment on tumor volume measurement was found to have a segmentation tool-related influence. Strong agreement between simulated tumors modeled in this study compared to their real counterparts suggests a high degree of similarity. This indicates that, volumetrically, simulated tumors embedded into patient CT data can serve as reasonable surrogates to real patient data.

[1]  E. Samei,et al.  Simulation of subtle lung nodules in projection chest radiography. , 1997, Radiology.

[2]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2014 , 2014, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  Martin Tall,et al.  Characterizing search, recognition, and decision in the detection of lung nodules on CT scans: elucidation with eye tracking. , 2015, Radiology.

[4]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A generic framework to simulate realistic lung, liver and renal pathologies in CT imaging , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  M. Robins,et al.  Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR). , 2013, Medical physics.

[6]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT-- influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  Rozemarijn Vliegenthart,et al.  Sensitivity and accuracy of volumetry of pulmonary nodules on low-dose 16- and 64-row multi-detector CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study , 2012, European Radiology.

[8]  A. Dirksen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT , 2012, Thorax.

[9]  M. McNitt-Gray,et al.  Variability in CT lung-nodule volumetry: Effects of dose reduction and reconstruction methods. , 2015, Medical physics.

[10]  Douglas M. Bates,et al.  LINEAR AND NONLINEAR MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS , 1998 .

[11]  Rongping Zeng,et al.  Seamless Insertion of Pulmonary Nodules in Chest CT Images , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Luis de Sisternes,et al.  A computational model to generate simulated three-dimensional breast masses. , 2015, Medical physics.

[13]  D. Midthun,et al.  An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: implementation of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs in clinical practice. , 2015, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[14]  W. Heindel,et al.  Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility , 2003, European Radiology.

[15]  A. Bankier,et al.  Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. , 2017, Radiology.

[16]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Development and comparison of projection and image space 3D nodule insertion techniques , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Inter-algorithm lesion volumetry comparison of real and 3D simulated lung lesions in CT , 2017, Medical Imaging.

[18]  Shuai Leng,et al.  Lesion insertion in projection domain for computed tomography image quality assessment , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[19]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Volume versus diameter assessment of small pulmonary nodules in CT lung cancer screening. , 2017, Translational lung cancer research.

[20]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of an Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm for Low-Contrast Detectability with a Third-Generation Dual-Source Multidetector CT Scanner: Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in a Multireader Study. , 2015, Radiology.

[21]  Huiman X Barnhart,et al.  Applications of the repeatability of quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical analysis of repeat data sets. , 2009, Translational oncology.

[22]  B. Ginneken,et al.  A comparison of six software packages for evaluation of solid lung nodules using semi-automated volumetry: What is the minimum increase in size to detect growth in repeated CT examinations , 2009, European Radiology.

[23]  Rongwei Fu,et al.  Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review to Update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Techniques for virtual lung nodule insertion: volumetric and morphometric comparison of projection-based and image-based methods for quantitative CT. , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  E Samei,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of lung nodules for paediatric multidetector array CT. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[26]  Rongping Zeng,et al.  Seamless insertion of real pulmonary nodules in chest CT exams , 2014, Medical Imaging.

[27]  D. Aberle,et al.  Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Evaluating variability in tumor measurements from same-day repeat CT scans of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. , 2009, Radiology.

[29]  G. Colditz,et al.  Online Continuing Education Activity Article Title: American Cancer Society Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines Continuing Medical Education Accreditation and Designation Statement: Continuing Nursing Education Accreditation and Designation Statement: Educational Objectives: Activity Disclosures Acs Co , 2022 .

[30]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[31]  Sam Peterson,et al.  Inter-Method Performance Study of Tumor Volumetry Assessment on Computed Tomography Test-Retest Data. , 2015, Academic radiology.