Validation study of a modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge.

BACKGROUND Nipple discharge occurs in 2% to 5% of women. We evaluated the effectiveness of a previously proposed treatment algorithm for these patients. METHODS Patients with pathologic nipple discharge and a negative mammogram and subareolar ultrasound were offered follow-up from 2005 to 2011 according to the algorithm. RESULTS A total of 192 patients, mean age 56 years, were studied. Risk of carcinoma among the entire cohort was 5%. Breast surgeon was consulted for 142 (74%) patients: 48 (34%) underwent initial subareolar excision and 94 (66%) were clinically followed. The rate of carcinoma was 17% (8/48) after initial subareolar excision, 0% (0/13) for those without imaging abnormalities, 23% (8/35) with imaging abnormalities, and 1% (1/94) with clinical follow-up. Of patients who underwent follow-up, 21% (n = 20) underwent subareolar excision because of imaging abnormality (n = 1, 1%) or persistent discharge (n = 19, 20%). Most patients had ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 5, 56%). CONCLUSIONS Patients with nipple discharge can be prospectively identified based on radiographic findings and clinical examination for safe clinical follow-up. Most will have resolution avoiding a surgical procedure.

[1]  P. Karstaedt,et al.  Navigating murky waters: a modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[2]  S. Kılıçturgay,et al.  Management of nipple discharge. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  M. Morrow,et al.  Ductography for nipple discharge: no replacement for ductal excision. , 1998, Surgery.

[4]  I. Ellis,et al.  Microdochectomy for single‐duct discharge from the nipple , 1988, The British journal of surgery.

[5]  T. King,et al.  A simple approach to nipple discharge. , 2000, The American surgeon.

[6]  E. Sauter,et al.  The association of bloody nipple discharge with breast pathology. , 2004, Surgery.

[7]  T. Manganaro,et al.  Surgical approach to nipple discharge: A ten‐year experience , 1999 .

[8]  G. Sakorafas Nipple discharge: current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. , 2001, Cancer treatment reviews.

[9]  R. Simmons,et al.  Nonsurgical Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge , 2003, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  T. Murad,et al.  Nipple Discharge from the Breast , 1982, Annals of surgery.

[11]  M. El-Tamer,et al.  The value of clinical characteristics and breast-imaging studies in predicting a histopathologic diagnosis of cancer or high-risk lesion in patients with spontaneous nipple discharge. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[12]  F. Peters,et al.  Hyperprolactinemia and nonpuerperal mastitis (duct ectasia). , 1989, JAMA.

[13]  J. Crowe,et al.  Comparative analysis of minimally invasive microductectomy versus major duct excision in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. , 2005, Surgery.

[14]  M. Drucker,et al.  Nipple discharge. Frequency and pathogenesis in an ambulatory population. , 1983, New York state journal of medicine.

[15]  J. Hoehn,et al.  Twenty-Year Outcome Following Central Duct Resection for Bloody Nipple Discharge , 2006, Annals of surgery.