The Word-Frequency Mirror Effect in Young, Old, and Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease: Evidence for Two Processes in Episodic Recognition Performance

Two experiments address the nature of the word-frequency mirror effect in episodic recognition performance and the underlying cognitive changes that occur in both healthy aging and in early-stage Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type (DAT). In Experiment 1, five groups of participants (young, healthy old, healthy old-old, very mildly demented individuals, and mildly demented individuals) studied lists of high- and low-frequency words and were given a yes/no episodic recognition test. The results indicated that there was a dramatic decrease in hit rate for low-frequency words across age and DAT, but no decrease for high-frequency words, thereby eliminating the low-frequency advantage typically found in recognition performance for the DAT individuals. For the distractor items, there was a clear advantage in rejecting low-frequency words compared to high-frequency words, and the size of this advantage was constant across groups of participants. This between-group pattern was replicated in a second experiment, in which only young adults were required to respond either under short or long response deadlines. The results are discussed with respect to an attentional control framework in which cognitively impaired groups of participants, and young adults at a short response deadline, rely more on baseline familiarity processes than on recollection-based processes. Discussion focuses on the nature of the recollection- and familiarity-based processes.

[1]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  The neuropsychology of memory and aging. , 1992 .

[2]  D. Balota,et al.  Semantic, phonological, and hybrid veridical and false memories in healthy older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type. , 2001, Neuropsychology.

[3]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[4]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  D. Balota,et al.  Spreading Activation in Episodic Memory: Further Evidence for Age Independence , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  B. Ober,et al.  Semantic priming in Alzheimer's disease: Meta-analysis and theoretical evaluation , 1995 .

[7]  J A Yesavage,et al.  Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  Arthur P. Shimamura,et al.  Memory and metamemory: Comparisons between patients with frontal lobe lesions and amnesic patients , 1989, Psychobiology.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Visual word recognition and pronunciation: A computational model of acquisition, skilled performance, and dyslexia. , 1989 .

[10]  L D Williams,et al.  Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[11]  T. Bashore,et al.  Age differences in word and language processing , 1995 .

[12]  L. Jacoby Remembering the data: analyzing interactive processes in reading , 1983 .

[13]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  Memorability, Word Frequency and Negative Recognition* , 1977 .

[14]  Felicia A. Huppert,et al.  Recognition Memory in Amnesic Patients: Effect of Temporal Context and Familiarity of Material , 1976, Cortex.

[15]  J M Watson,et al.  Cross-modal semantic and homograph priming in healthy young, healthy old, and in Alzheimer's disease individuals , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[16]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  VERIDICAL AND FALSE MEMORIES IN HEALTHY OLDER ADULTS AND IN DEMENTIA OF THE ALZHEIMER'S TYPE , 1999 .

[17]  A. Thapar,et al.  Mirror effect in frequency discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  W. Hockley,et al.  Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  N Butters,et al.  Episodic and semantic memory: a comparison of amnesic and demented patients. , 1987, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[20]  J. Aggleton,et al.  Amnesia and recognition memory: A re-analysis of psychometric data , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Arthur P. Shimamura,et al.  On the relationship between recall and recognition memory. , 1992 .

[22]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  R. Nebes,et al.  Contextual facilitation of lexical processing in Alzheimer's disease: intralexical priming or sentence-level priming? , 1994, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[24]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The Boston naming test , 2001 .

[25]  D C LeCompte,et al.  Role of study strategy in recall of mixed lists of common and rare words. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  A J Parkin,et al.  Recollective experience, normal aging, and frontal dysfunction. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[27]  L. Jacoby Perceptual enhancement: persistent effects of an experience. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  D. B. Mitchell,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 2001 .

[29]  L. Cermak,et al.  Perceptual fluency as a cue for recognition judgments in amnesia. , 1999, Neuropsychology.

[30]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  An illusion of memory: false recognition influenced by unconscious perception , 1989 .

[31]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  J. Gardiner,et al.  Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[33]  T. Mäntylä Knowing but not remembering: Adult age differences in recollective experience , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[34]  D. Balota,et al.  Relating anatomy to function in Alzheimer's disease , 1998, Neurology.

[35]  R. Bjork,et al.  Predicting the future and reconstructing the past: a Bayesian characterization of the utility of subjective fluency. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[36]  R L Greene,et al.  Mirror effect in frequency discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  J. Duchek,et al.  Reliability of the Washington University Clinical Dementia Rating. , 1988, Archives of neurology.

[38]  D. Balota,et al.  Implicit Memory and the Formation of New Associations in Nondemented Parkinson′s Disease Individuals and Individuals with Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type: A Serial Reaction Time (SRT) Investigation , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[39]  L. Reder,et al.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View , 1988 .

[41]  R. Java,et al.  Effects of age on state of awareness following implicit and explicit word-association tasks. , 1996, Psychology and aging.

[42]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response latencies for false memories: gist-based processes in normal aging. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[43]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval constraints and the mirror effect , 1994 .

[44]  R S Wilson,et al.  Word frequency effect and recognition memory in dementia of the Alzheimer type. , 1983, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[45]  Anthony F Jorm,et al.  Controlled and automatic information processing in senile dementia: a review , 1986, Psychological Medicine.

[46]  R. Nebes,et al.  Sparing of semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease. , 1984, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[47]  David A. Balota,et al.  Lexical, Sublexical, and Implicit Memory Processes in Healthy Young and Healthy Older Adults and in Individuals With Dementia of the Alzheimer Type , 1996 .

[48]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Aging and source monitoring: cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  E. Glisky,et al.  Double dissociation between item and source memory. , 1995 .

[50]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[51]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[52]  J. Price,et al.  Clinicopathologic studies in cognitively healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: relation of histologic markers to dementia severity, age, sex, and apolipoprotein E genotype. , 1998, Archives of neurology.

[53]  M. Moscovitch Afferent and efferent models of visual perceptual asymmetries: Theoretical and empirical implications , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments. , 1998 .

[55]  D. Balota,et al.  The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? ☆ , 1985 .

[56]  R. West,et al.  An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  Larry L. Jacoby,et al.  DECEIVING THE ELDERLY: EFFECTS OF ACCESSIBILITY BIAS IN CUED-RECALL PERFORMANCE , 1999 .

[58]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[59]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory , 1976 .

[60]  R. Guttentag,et al.  Memorability judgments for high- and low-frequency words , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[61]  Albert M. Galaburda,et al.  From Reading to Neurons , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  David A. Balota,et al.  Test-Expectancy and Word-Frequency Effects in Recall and Recognition , 1980 .

[63]  R. Nebes Cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer''s disease , 1992 .

[64]  Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. , 1992 .

[65]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[66]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia , 1982, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[67]  J. Wixted Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[68]  L D Williams,et al.  The source of feelings of familiarity: the discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[70]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Priming in pronunciation: Beyond pattern recognition and onset latency , 1989 .

[71]  D. Balota,et al.  Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[72]  J. Price,et al.  Cerebral amyloid deposition and diffuse plaques in ``normal'' aging , 1996, Neurology.

[73]  David A. Balota,et al.  Semantic priming effects, lexical repetition effects, and contextual disambiguation effects in healthy aged individuals and individuals with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type , 1991, Brain and Language.

[74]  F. Craik,et al.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[75]  J T Wixted,et al.  Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[76]  Jas. Middlemass,et al.  Archives of Neurology , 1903, British medical journal.