Pseudo amino acid composition and multi-class support vector machines approach for conotoxin superfamily classification.

Conotoxins are disulfide rich small peptides that target a broad spectrum of ion-channels and neuronal receptors. They offer promising avenues in the treatment of chronic pain, epilepsy and cardiovascular diseases. Assignment of newly sequenced mature conotoxins into appropriate superfamilies using a computational approach could provide valuable preliminary information on the biological and pharmacological functions of the toxins. However, creation of protein sequence patterns for the reliable identification and classification of new conotoxin sequences may not be effective due to the hypervariability of mature toxins. With the aim of formulating an in silico approach for the classification of conotoxins into superfamilies, we have incorporated the concept of pseudo-amino acid composition to represent a peptide in a mathematical framework that includes the sequence-order effect along with conventional amino acid composition. The polarity index attribute, which encodes information such as residue surface buriability, polarity, and hydropathy, was used to store the sequence-order effect. Several methods like BLAST, ISort (Intimate Sorting) predictor, least Hamming distance algorithm, least Euclidean distance algorithm and multi-class support vector machines (SVMs), were explored for superfamily identification. The SVMs outperform other methods providing an overall accuracy of 88.1% for all correct predictions with generalized squared correlation of 0.75 using jackknife cross-validation test for A, M, O and T superfamilies and a negative set consisting of short cysteine rich sequences from different eukaryotes having diverse functions. The computed sensitivity and specificity for the superfamilies were found to be in the range of 84.0-94.1% and 80.0-95.5%, respectively, attesting to the efficacy of multi-class SVMs for the successful in silico classification of the conotoxins into their superfamilies.

[1]  Sukanta Mondal,et al.  I‐conotoxin superfamily revisited , 2006, Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society.

[2]  Amos Bairoch,et al.  Recent improvements to the PROSITE database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[3]  W. Atchley,et al.  Solving the protein sequence metric problem. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview , 2000, Bioinform..

[5]  Zheng Rong Yang,et al.  Biological applications of support vector machines , 2004, Briefings Bioinform..

[6]  K. Chou.  Progress in protein structural class prediction and its impact to bioinformatics and proteomics. , 2005, Current protein & peptide science.

[7]  B. Matthews.  Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  K Nishikawa,et al.  The folding type of a protein is relevant to the amino acid composition. , 1986, Journal of biochemistry.

[9]  David Haussler,et al.  Classifying G-protein coupled receptors with support vector machines , 2002, Bioinform..

[10]  Amos Bairoch,et al.  Swiss-Prot: Juggling between evolution and stability , 2004, Briefings Bioinform..

[11]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[12]  Y. Gilad,et al.  Mechanisms for evolving hypervariability: the case of conopeptides. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  Jason Weston,et al.  Support vector machines for multi-class pattern recognition , 1999, ESANN.

[14]  Yu-Dong Cai,et al.  Predicting protease types by hybridizing gene ontology and pseudo amino acid composition , 2006, Proteins.

[15]  Bernard F. Buxton,et al.  Drug Design by Machine Learning: Support Vector Machines for Pharmaceutical Data Analysis , 2001, Comput. Chem..

[16]  K. Chou,et al.  Support vector machines for predicting membrane protein types by using functional domain composition. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[17]  D. Yoshikami,et al.  Characterization of D‐amino‐acid‐containing excitatory conotoxins and redefinition of the I‐conotoxin superfamily , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[18]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[19]  K. Garber.  Peptide leads new class of chronic pain drugs , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  K. Chou.  Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo‐amino acid composition , 2001, Proteins.

[21]  Judith Klein-Seetharaman,et al.  PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 58:955–970 (2005) Protein Classification Based on Text Document Classification Techniques , 2022 .

[22]  B. Olivera,et al.  Conus venoms: a rich source of novel ion channel-targeted peptides. , 2004, Physiological reviews.

[23]  Koby Crammer,et al.  On the Algorithmic Implementation of Multiclass Kernel-based Vector Machines , 2002, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[24]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Clustering of highly homologous sequences to reduce the size of large protein databases , 2001, Bioinform..

[25]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Support vector machine learning for interdependent and structured output spaces , 2004, ICML.

[26]  Terri K. Attwood,et al.  PRINTS and its automatic supplement, prePRINTS , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  K. Chou,et al.  Prediction of protein structural classes. , 1995, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[28]  B. Olivera,et al.  E.E. Just Lecture, 1996. Conus venom peptides, receptor and ion channel targets, and drug design: 50 million years of neuropharmacology. , 1997, Molecular biology of the cell.

[29]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Cone venom--from accidental stings to deliberate injection. , 2001, Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology.

[30]  Tong Tang,et al.  Proceedings of the European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks , 2006 .

[31]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[32]  Kuo-Chen Chou,et al.  Prediction of protease types in a hybridization space. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[33]  R M Jones,et al.  Conotoxins - new vistas for peptide therapeutics. , 2000, Current pharmaceutical design.

[34]  M. Bhasin,et al.  Support Vector Machine-based Method for Subcellular Localization of Human Proteins Using Amino Acid Compositions, Their Order, and Similarity Search* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  Chris H. Q. Ding,et al.  Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks , 2001, Bioinform..

[36]  Bermseok Oh,et al.  Prediction of phosphorylation sites using SVMs , 2004, Bioinform..

[37]  G. Fasman.  Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation , 2012, Springer US.

[38]  David R. Westhead,et al.  Improved prediction of protein-protein binding sites using a support vector machines approach. , 2005, Bioinformatics.

[39]  Miljanich Gp,et al.  Ziconotide: neuronal calcium channel blocker for treating severe chronic pain. , 2004 .

[40]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Prediction of Protein Structural Classes from Amino Acid Compositions , 1989 .

[41]  B. Olivera,et al.  Post-translationally modified neuropeptides from Conus venoms. , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.