When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?

What happens after visual attention is allocated to an object? Although many theories of attention assume that all of its features are selected and processed, there has been little direct evidence that an irrelevant feature dimension of an attended nontarget is processed. In 5 experiments presented here, the authors used a singleton paradigm to investigate the effect of attention on nontarget objects. Participants made a speeded feature discrimination of a target for which the response was either compatible or incompatible with an irrelevant feature dimension of a distractor. The results show that the irrelevant distractor features were processed to the point that they interfered with the response to the target. The response compatibility effect was observed even when the location of the target or the distractor was invariant, although it was much weaker when both locations were invariant. These results demonstrate that in many circumstances, an attended distractor is completely selected and fully processed, and the complete processing of distractors depends on a number of factors, many of which are related to the strength of attention to the distractor.

[1]  B. Scholl.  Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[2]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Spatial selectivity in visual search , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Between-dimension flanker effects: A clarification with encouraging implications , 1998 .

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Attentional focus, processing load, and Stroop interference , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  M. R. Houck,et al.  The role of attentional resources in automatic detection , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[9]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  B. Gibson,et al.  Surprise! An Unexpected Color Singleton Does Not Capture Attention in Visual Search , 1998 .

[11]  Steven M. J. Hunt,et al.  MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter’s workstation for the cognitive sciences , 1994 .

[12]  B. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention-Related Modulation of Sensory-Evoked Brain Activity in a Visual Search Task , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  A Treisman,et al.  Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  H. Hughes,et al.  Distractor-target interactions during directed visual attention. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[20]  A. Mack.  Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[21]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[22]  K. Cave.  The FeatureGate model of visual selection , 1999, Psychological research.

[23]  J R Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Zhe Chen.  Selective attention and the perception of an attended nontarget object. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[27]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Z Chen.  An object-based cost of visual filtering , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Uri Feintuch,et al.  Visual Attention and Coactivation of Response Decisions for Features from Different Dimensions , 2002 .

[30]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  H. Hughes,et al.  Spatial maps of directed visual attention. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  A Dissociation Between Attention and Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[34]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  K. Cave,et al.  Grouping effects on spatial attention in visual search. , 1999, The Journal of general psychology.

[36]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Kyle R Cave,et al.  Reinstating object-based attention under positional certainty: The importance of subjective parsing , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  J. Requin.  Attention and Performance VII , 1980 .

[40]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  K. Cave,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  Olaf B. Paulson,et al.  Parieto–Occipital Areas Involved in Efficient Filtering in Search: A Time Course Analysis of Visual Marking using Behavioural and Functional Imaging Procedures , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[43]  K. Cave,et al.  Spatial Attention in Visual Search for Features and Feature Conjunctions , 1995 .

[44]  Paul Maruff,et al.  Behavioral Goals Constrain the Selection of Visual Information , 1999 .

[45]  F Smith,et al.  Temporal factors in visual information processing. , 1966, Canadian journal of psychology.

[46]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  J. Wolfe.  Inattentional Amnesia , 2000 .

[48]  D. Broadbent.  Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[49]  Howard S. Bashinski,et al.  Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  I. Rock,et al.  Perceptual organization and attention , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[51]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  W Prinzmetal,et al.  The Effect of Attention on Phenomenal Length , 1997, Perception.

[53]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Postattentive vision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Phenomenology of attention: I. Color, location, orientation, and spatial frequency. , 1998 .

[56]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4 , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  C. R. Snyder.  Selection, inspection, and naming in visual search. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  Y Tsal,et al.  Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[61]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  A. Hunt.  Attention and oculomotor capture , 2005 .

[63]  C. J. Downing.  Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  S. Luck,et al.  The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: an electrophysiological analysis. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[66]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by vocal reaction time , 1972 .

[67]  Zhe Chen.  Switching attention within and between objects : The role of subjective organization , 1998 .

[68]  H. Pashler,et al.  Visual selection mediated by location: Selecting successive visual objects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  J. Theeuwes.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[70]  K. Cave,et al.  Flexibility in Spatial Attention Before and After Practice , 1997 .

[71]  Y. Tsal,et al.  On the status of location in visual attention , 2001 .

[72]  B. Gibson,et al.  Attraction, Distraction and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Advances in Psychology , 2001 .

[73]  David LaBerge,et al.  Spatial extent of attention to letters and words , 1983 .

[74]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Location dominance in attending to color and shape. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  W. H. Payne,et al.  Reaction time as a function of retinal location. , 1966, Vision research.

[76]  Asher Cohen,et al.  Perceptual Dimensional Constraints in Response Selection Processes , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[77]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.