Landscape location affects genetic variation of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis)

The effect of a population's location on the landscape on genetic variation has been of interest to population genetics for more than half a century. However, most studies do not consider broadscale biogeography when interpreting genetic data. In this study, we propose an operational definition of a peripheral population, and then explore whether peripheral populations of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) have less genetic variation than core populations at nine microsatellite loci. We show that peripheral populations of lynx have fewer mean numbers of alleles per population and lower expected heterozygosity. This is surprising, given the lynx's capacity to move long distances, but can be explained by the fact that peripheral populations often have smaller population sizes, limited opportunities for genetic exchange and may be disproportionately affected by ebbs and flows of species’ geographical range.

[1]  P. Tigerstedt,et al.  Studies on isozyme variation in marginal and central populations of Picea abies. , 2009, Hereditas.

[2]  L. Waits,et al.  Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[3]  P. Leberg Strategies for population reintroduction: effects of genetic variability on population growth and size , 1993 .

[4]  Kevin S. McKelvey,et al.  Ecology and Conservation of Lynx in the United States , 2000 .

[5]  J. Lawton,et al.  Range, population abundance and conservation. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  R. Vrijenhoek,et al.  Fitness differences among remnant populations of the endangered sonoran topminnow. , 1989, Science.

[7]  W. Köppen,et al.  Grundriss der Klimakunde , 1931 .

[8]  T. Dobzhansky Genetics of the Evolutionary Process , 1970 .

[9]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Assessing Extinction Threats: Toward a Reevaluation of IUCN Threatened Species Categories , 1991 .

[10]  M. Nei,et al.  THE BOTTLENECK EFFECT AND GENETIC VARIABILITY IN POPULATIONS , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  H. Carson,et al.  Genetic conditions which promote or retard the formation of species. , 1959, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[12]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of ten microsatellite loci in four species of Felidae. , 1995, The Journal of heredity.

[13]  P. Brussard,et al.  Geographic Patterns and Environmental Gradients: The Central-Marginal Model in Drosophila Revisited , 1984 .

[14]  S. Amstrup,et al.  Genetic structure of the world’s polar bear populations , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[15]  G. Koehler Population and habitat characteristics of lynx and snowshoe hares in north central Washington , 1990 .

[16]  P. Leberg,et al.  Estimating allelic richness: Effects of sample size and bottlenecks , 2002, Molecular ecology.

[17]  K. Poole Dispersal patterns of lynx in the Northwest Territories , 1997 .

[18]  Range Experiment Station,et al.  The Scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores , 1994 .

[19]  M. Soulé,et al.  Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. , 1988 .

[20]  L. Jack Lyon,et al.  The Scientific basis for conserving forest carnivores : American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine in the western United States / , 1994 .

[21]  E. Thompson,et al.  Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. , 1992, Biometrics.

[22]  M. Soulé,et al.  The Epistasis Cycle: A Theory of Marginal Populations , 1973 .

[23]  J. Diffendorfer,et al.  The effects of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of small mammal populations. , 1997, The Journal of heredity.

[24]  Rob Channell,et al.  Trajectories to extinction: spatial dynamics of the contraction of geographical ranges , 2000 .

[25]  Brent J. Danielson,et al.  The effects of landscape composition and physiognomy on metapopulation size: the role of corridors , 1997, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  L. Cwynar,et al.  Geographical Variation of Lodgepole Pine in Relation to Population History , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[27]  H. Carson Response to selection under different conditions of recombination in Drosophila. , 1958, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[28]  R. Frankham Inbreeding and Extinction: Island Populations , 1998 .

[29]  W. H. Burt Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[30]  F. Allendorf Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity , 1986 .

[31]  Salit Kark,et al.  Core and Peripheral-Populations and Global Climate-Change , 1994 .

[32]  X. Vekemans,et al.  Allozyme variation in relation to ecotypic differentiation and population size in marginal populations of Silene nutans , 1997, Heredity.

[33]  C. Wills,et al.  ANALYSIS OF MITOCHONDRIAL DNA POLYMORPHISMS AMONG CHANNEL ISLAND DEER MICE , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  François Rousset,et al.  GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenicism , 1995 .

[35]  Kevin S. McKelvey,et al.  DNA reveals high dispersal synchronizing the population dynamics of Canada lynx , 2002, Nature.

[36]  A A Schäffer,et al.  A genetic linkage map of microsatellites in the domestic cat (Felis catus). , 1999, Genomics.

[37]  J. Hamrick,et al.  GENETIC STRUCTURE OF GEOGRAPHICALLY MARGINAL POPULATIONS OF PONDEROSA PINE , 1989 .

[38]  H. Descimon,et al.  Enzyme polymorphism, wing pattern variability, and geographical isolation in an endangered butterfly species , 1993 .

[39]  Peter Lesica,et al.  When Are Peripheral Populations Valuable for Conservation , 1995 .

[40]  K. McKelvey History and distribution of lynx in the contiguous United States [Chapter 8] , 2000 .

[41]  D. Levin Developmental Instability and Evolution in Peripheral Isolates , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[42]  G. Luikart,et al.  Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. , 1998, The Journal of heredity.

[43]  Ych-chu Wang Molecular ecology , 1992, Journal of Northeast Forestry University.

[44]  Mark V. Lomolino,et al.  Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species , 2000, Nature.

[45]  R. Frankham Inbreeding and Extinction: A Threshold Effect , 1995 .

[46]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective , 1980 .

[47]  O. Frankel Genetic conservation: our evolutionary responsibility. , 1974, Genetics.

[48]  U. Fish Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants , 1987 .

[49]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  DISPERSAL DISTANCE OF MAMMALS IS PROPORTIONAL TO HOME RANGE SIZE , 2002 .

[50]  C. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural responses of lynx to declining snowshoe hare abundance , 1985 .

[51]  G. Trewartha An Introduction to Weather and Climate , 1938, Nature.

[52]  Ecology of Lynx in Northern Canada and Alaska , 1999 .

[53]  U. Safriel,et al.  Phenotypic variation and stress resistance in core and peripheral populations of Hordeum spontaneum , 1998, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[54]  B. Slough,et al.  Lynx population dynamics in an untrapped refugium , 1996 .

[55]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  L. Mech Age, Sex, Reproduction, and Spatial Organization of Lynxes Colonizing Northeastern Minnesota , 1980 .

[57]  B. Goossens,et al.  Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[58]  R. Frankham Inbreeding and Extinction in Island Populations: Reply to Elgar and Clode , 2001 .