An Efficacy Trial of Research-Based Curriculum Materials With Curriculum-Based Professional Development
暂无分享,去创建一个
Janet F. Carlson | Christopher D. Wilson | Janet Carlson | Joseph A. Taylor | Susan M. Kowalski | S. Getty | Stephen R. Getty | Pamela Van Scotter | Pamela Van Scotter
[1] Alejandro Mauricio Dávila Rubio. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005) Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD , 2017 .
[2] Laura Hoch,et al. Implementing Change Patterns Principles And Potholes , 2016 .
[3] Jonas Schmitt,et al. Understanding By Design , 2016 .
[4] Sally Brown. Authentic assessment: using assessment to help students learn. , 2015 .
[5] D. Francis,et al. Helping ELLs Meet the Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Science: The Impact of an Instructional Intervention Focused on Academic Language , 2014 .
[6] William F. McComas,et al. The Atlas of Science Literacy , 2014 .
[7] Philip M. Sadler,et al. The Influence of Teachers’ Knowledge on Student Learning in Middle School Physical Science Classrooms , 2013 .
[8] P. Kirschner,et al. Do Learners Really Know Best? Urban Legends in Education , 2013 .
[9] Ngss Lead States. Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .
[10] J. Earle,et al. Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development , 2013 .
[11] David A. Gillam,et al. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .
[12] Sharon J. Lynch,et al. A retrospective view of a study of middle school science curriculum materials: Implementation, scale‐up, and sustainability in a changing policy environment , 2012 .
[13] Elizabeth A. Davis,et al. Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge , 2012 .
[14] Savitha Moorthy,et al. Preparing Teachers to Design Sequences of Instruction in Earth Systems Science , 2011 .
[15] Cory T. Forbes,et al. Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers' mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials , 2010 .
[16] P. Black,et al. Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment , 2010 .
[17] F. Manganello. Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? , 2010 .
[18] David Klahr. Coming Up for Air: But Is It Oxygen or Phlogiston? A Response to Taber's Review of Constructivist Instruction: Success Or Failure? , 2010 .
[19] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Investigating Teacher Learning Supports in High School Biology Curricular Programs to Inform the Design of Educative Curriculum Materials , 2009 .
[20] Daniel L. Murphy,et al. Three-Level Models for Indirect Effects in School- and Class-Randomized Experiments in Education , 2009 .
[21] Scott D. Gest,et al. Fostering High-Quality Teaching With an Enriched Curriculum and Professional Development Support:The Head Start REDI Program , 2009, American educational research journal.
[22] David H. Jonassen. Reconciling a Human Cognitive Architecture , 2009 .
[23] R. G. Duncan,et al. Beyond the fringe: Building and evaluating scientific knowledge systems , 2009 .
[24] Katherine L. McNeill. Teachers' use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena , 2009 .
[25] Mark W. Lipsey,et al. Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research , 2008 .
[26] S. Raudenbush,et al. Empirical Issues in the Design of Group-Randomized Studies to Measure the Effects of Interventions for Children , 2008 .
[27] Julie Sarama,et al. Experimental Evaluation of the Effects of a Research-Based Preschool Mathematics Curriculum , 2008 .
[28] D. Mackinnon. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2008 .
[29] Robert E. Slavin,et al. Perspectives on Evidence-Based Research in Education—What Works? Issues in Synthesizing Educational Program Evaluations , 2008 .
[30] Matthew S. Fritz,et al. Mediation analysis. , 2019, Annual review of psychology.
[31] C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al. Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .
[32] H. Schweingruber,et al. TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .
[33] Andrew T. Stull,et al. Three Experimental Comparisons of Learner-generated versus Author-provided Graphic Organizers , 2007 .
[34] Barry Fishman,et al. Exploring the relationship between teachers' curriculum enactment experience and their understanding of underlying unit structures , 2006 .
[35] Richard E. Clark,et al. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .
[36] J. Remillard. Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula , 2005 .
[37] J. Krajcik,et al. Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning , 2005 .
[38] W. Schmidt,et al. Curriculum coherence: an examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective , 2005 .
[39] G Wiggins,et al. Understanding by design (expanded 2nd ed. , 2005 .
[40] M. Cole,et al. Mind in Society , 2005 .
[41] L. Hedges,et al. How Large Are Teacher Effects? , 2004 .
[42] R. Mayer. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.
[43] Irene Bloom,et al. Measuring Reform Practices in Science and Mathematics Classrooms: The Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol , 2002 .
[44] J. Krajcik,et al. Supporting Science Teacher Learning: The Role of Educative Curriculum Materials , 2002 .
[45] Jo Ellen Roseman,et al. How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .
[46] Ronald D. Anderson,et al. Changing teachers' practice: curriculum materials and science education reform in the USA , 2002 .
[47] William H. Schmidt,et al. A Coherent Curriculum: The Case of Mathematics. , 2002 .
[48] R. Glaser,et al. Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment , 2001 .
[49] William H. Schmidt,et al. Why Schools Matter: A Cross-National Comparison of Curriculum and Learning , 2001 .
[50] Sharon J. Lynch. “Science for all” is not equal to “one size fits all”: Linguistic and cultural diversity and science education reform , 2001 .
[51] M. Fullan. Leading in a Culture of Change , 2001 .
[52] W. Shadish,et al. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference , 2001 .
[53] Douglas A. Roberts,et al. Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices , 2000 .
[54] STANDARDS, ASSESSMENTS—AND WHAT ELSE? THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF STANDARDS-BASED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT1 , 2000 .
[55] California. Legislature. REPORT TO THE , 1998 .
[56] S. Loucks-Horsley. Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics , 1997 .
[57] L. Darling-Hammond,et al. Doing what matters most : investing in quality teaching , 1997 .
[58] S. Raudenbush. Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials , 1997 .
[59] William H. Schmidt,et al. A splintered vision : an investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education , 1997 .
[60] D. Ball,et al. Reform by the Book: What Is—or Might Be—the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform? , 1996 .
[61] Joseph Krajcik,et al. A Middle Grade Science Teacher's Emerging Understanding of Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.
[62] D. Laplane. Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.
[63] Rodger W. Bybee,et al. Science for Life & Living: An Elementary School Science Program from Biological Sciences Curriculum Study , 1990 .
[64] Joseph D. Novak,et al. Learning Science and the Science of Learning , 1988 .
[65] E. Yalow. Educational psychology: A cognitive view. 2nd ed. , 1978 .
[66] J. R. Landis,et al. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.