Quantity constraints on the temporal implementation of phrasal prosody in Northern Finnish

This study investigated interactions between vowel quantity and two types of prosodic lengthening (accentual lengthening and the combined effect of accentual and utterance-final lengthening) in disyllabic words in Northern Finnish. Two quantity-related constraints were observed. First, in both types of prosodic lengthening, vowels were lengthened less when they were next to a syllable containing a double vowel than when they were next to a syllable containing a single vowel (a quantity neighbour constraint). Second, a durational ceiling effect was observed for the phonologically single, half-long vowel under the combined effect of accentual and utterance-final lengthening. These findings can be seen to support the view that quantity languages regulate the non-phonemic use of duration because of the high functional load of duration at the phonemic level. Additionally, the combined effect of accentual and utterance-final lengthening appeared to have its own lengthening profile, distinct from the simple sum of the two lengthening effects suggested previously. Implications for speech timing research will be discussed.

[1]  R Berkovits,et al.  Progressive Utterance-Final Lengthening in Syllables with Final Fricatives , 1993, Language and speech.

[2]  S G Nooteboom,et al.  Production and perception of vowel length in spoken sentences. , 1980, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Mirjam Ernestus,et al.  Prosodic conditioning of phonetic detail in German plosives , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[4]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words , 2007, J. Phonetics.

[5]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  A task-dynamic toolkit for modeling the effects of prosodic structure on articulation , 2008, Speech Prosody 2008.

[6]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[7]  J. Lehtonen Aspects of quantity in standard Finnish , 1970 .

[8]  Fred Karlsson Suomen yleiskielen segmentaalifoneemien paradigma , 1969 .

[9]  Rochele Berkovits,et al.  The Effect of Speaking Rate on Evidence for Utterance-Final Lengthening , 1991 .

[10]  L Saltzman Elliot,et al.  A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production , 1989 .

[11]  Dani Byrd,et al.  The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[12]  K. D. Jong,et al.  Stress, duration, and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody , 1999 .

[13]  William J. Hardcastle,et al.  The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd Edition , 2010 .

[14]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Lauri Hakulinen,et al.  The Structure and Development of the Finnish Language , 1997 .

[16]  Laurence White,et al.  English speech timing : a domain and locus approach , 2002 .

[17]  G. M. Cambier Langeveld,et al.  Temporal Marking of Accents and Boundaries , 2000 .

[18]  Kari Suomi,et al.  Finnish sound structure : phonetics, phonology, phonotactics and prosody , 2008 .

[19]  Sungbok Lee,et al.  How far, how long: on the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Laurence White,et al.  The long and the short and the final: Phonological vowel length and prosodic timing in Hungarian , 2008 .

[21]  Agaath M. C. Sluijter,et al.  Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Fletcher The Prosody of Speech: Timing and Rhythm , 2010 .

[23]  Fred Karlsson Finnish: An Essential Grammar , 1999 .

[24]  Bert Remijsen,et al.  Why are three-level vowel length systems rare? Insights from Dinka (Luanyjang dialect) , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[25]  Gösta Bruce,et al.  On the analysis of prosody in spontaneous speech with exemplification from Swedish and French , 1992, Speech Commun..

[26]  R. Ivry,et al.  Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Kari Suomi,et al.  Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[28]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[29]  R. Fox,et al.  Between-speaker and within-speaker variation in speech tempo of American English. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[31]  Sherman Wilcox,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Phonetic Structure , 1992 .

[32]  Kari Suomi,et al.  Durational and tonal correlates of accent in Finnish , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[33]  Yee-Jean Janice Fon A cross-linguistic study on syntactic and discourse boundary cues in spontaneous speech , 2002 .

[34]  Nikolaus Ritt,et al.  Quantity Adjustment: Vowel Lengthening and Shortening in Early Middle English , 1994 .

[35]  Wayne Lee EXperimental design and analysis , 1975 .

[36]  D. Klatt Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Richard Ogden Non-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnish , 2004 .

[38]  Tara L Whitehill,et al.  Effect of intonation on cantonese lexical tones. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Haruo Kubozono,et al.  Temporal neutralization in Japanese , 2002 .

[40]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[41]  Scott Myers,et al.  The Origin of Vowel Length Neutralization in Final Position: Evidence from Finnish Speakers , 2007 .

[42]  Yi Xu,et al.  In defense of lab speech , 2010, J. Phonetics.

[43]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Intragestural dynamics of multiple prosodic boundaries , 1998 .

[44]  Lya Meister,et al.  Perception of the short vs. long phonological category in Estonian by native and non-native listeners , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[45]  M. Beckman,et al.  The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[47]  Riikka Ylitalo,et al.  The Realisation of Prominence in Three Varieties of Standard Spoken Finnish , 2009 .

[48]  Gitta P. M. Laan The contribution of intonation, segmental durations, and spectral features to the perception of a spontaneous and a read speaking style , 1997, Speech Commun..

[49]  Kari Suomi,et al.  Durational elasticity for accentual purposes in Northern Finnish , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[50]  Alice Turk,et al.  Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: a practical guide , 2006 .

[51]  W. Cooper,et al.  Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  Fred Cummins,et al.  Some lengthening factors in English speech combine additively at most rates. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[54]  Michael O´Dell,et al.  Intrinsic Timing and Quantity in Finnish , 2003 .