Applying lean thinking in an educational institute – an action research

Purpose Lean thinking (LT) has been implemented in various manufacturing and service sectors. But, only a few published research articles have developed a framework describing the procedure for implementing LT in an educational institute. The purpose of this paper is to develop and demonstrate a framework that can provide a structured procedure for the implementation of LT in an educational institute. Design/methodology/approach Various LT tools and techniques applicable in educational institute were identified by reviewing the relevant literature. By adopting an action research methodology (ARM) for a time period of 28 months, the processes in a case institute were studied; wastes in the process were identified and various solutions were proposed and implemented. Findings A comparison of the performance measures before (Batch 1) and after (Batch 2) implementation of solutions provided interesting insights into the effectiveness of LT. In both the batches, absenteeism in the class was found to increase across the terms. But the magnitude of increase was lesser in Batch 2. Results also showed that the number of unfilled seats (poor utilization) in an elective course in the second year of the program drastically reduced in Batch 2. Finally, a framework that can guide LT implementation in educational institutes was proposed. Research limitations/implications The current study describes only the initial stages of implementation in an educational institute. Hence, some of the benefits discussed are expected in the long run which can be assessed by carrying out a longitudinal study. Future study can attempt to empirically validate the proposed framework in multiple educational institutes and theoretically explain the reasons behind the results obtained. Practical implications ARM can be used as a tool by practitioners to study the behavioral aspects of employees of educational institutes toward LT implementation. The proposed framework and its demonstration can assist employees in educational institutes to implement LT. Positive results obtained in this study can further motivate the educational institutes to consider LT as a potential tool for improving the processes. Originality/value This is the first study to develop and validate a framework for structured implementation of LT in the processes of an educational institute. The study is also unique in empirically capturing the impact of LT implementation of an educational institute by analyzing the archived data.

[1]  Delvin Grant,et al.  Quality management applied to higher education , 2000 .

[2]  D. K. Banwet,et al.  Enhancing quality in education: application of quality function deployment – an industry perspective , 2003 .

[3]  R. Westbrook.  Action research: a new paradigm for research in production andoperations management , 1995 .

[4]  J. J. Dahlgaard,et al.  Measuring lean initiatives in health care services: issues and findings , 2006 .

[5]  Rachna Shah,et al.  Defining and developing measures of lean production , 2007 .

[6]  M. Sharabi.  Managing and improving service quality in higher education , 2013 .

[7]  Mark S. Doman.  A New Lean Paradigm in Higher Education: A Case Study. , 2011 .

[8]  Dennis F. X. Mathaisel,et al.  A case study in applying lean sustainability concepts to universities , 2005 .

[9]  Jaideep Motwani,et al.  A comprehensive model for implementing total quality management in higher education , 1997 .

[10]  M. Vijaya Sunder.  Quality excellence in higher education system through Six Sigma: student team engagement model , 2014 .

[11]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Using kaizen to improve graduate business school degree programs , 2005 .

[12]  S. Ghoshal.  Musings: Business Schools Share the Blame for Enron , 2003 .

[13]  Peter Hines,et al.  New Development: Creating a Lean University , 2007 .

[14]  Steven C. Ross,et al.  APPLYING LEAN PRINCIPLES IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS - A CASE STUDY , 2010 .

[15]  C. Handy,et al.  What's a business for? , 2002, Harvard business review.

[16]  Ed Cohen,et al.  What Business Needs from Business Schools , 2009 .

[17]  Anand Gurumurthy,et al.  Experience of implementing lean thinking in an Indian healthcare institution , 2018, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma.

[18]  M. Sunder,et al.  Lean Six Sigma in higher education institutions , 2016 .

[19]  Maneesh Kumar,et al.  Lean Six Sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs): Challenges, barriers, success factors, tools/techniques , 2012 .

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[21]  M. Gilmore,et al.  Set‐up reduction in pharmaceutical manufacturing: an action research study , 1996 .

[22]  Christopher Grey,et al.  Reinventing Business Schools: The Contribution of Critical Management Education , 2004 .

[23]  M. Emiliani.  Improving management education , 2006 .

[24]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Nurse-led liaison mental health service for older adults: service development using lean thinking methodology. , 2012, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[25]  C. D. Jennings,et al.  Lessons from industry: one school's transformation toward "lean" curricular governance. , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[26]  Dennis F. X. Mathaisel,et al.  Less is more: a framework for a sustainable university , 2003 .

[27]  Dennis F. X. Mathaisel,et al.  An exploratory study of best lean sustainability practices in higher education , 2005 .

[28]  Peter Hogg,et al.  A mixed model study evaluating lean in the transformation of an orthopaedic radiology service , 2013 .

[29]  Ben A. Maguad.  Lean Strategies for Education: Overcoming the Waste Factor. , 2007 .

[30]  F. Mizikaci.  Quality Systems and Accredition in Higher Education: An overview of Turkish higher education , 2003 .

[31]  William A. Pasmore,et al.  An Action-Research Program for Increasing Employee Involvement in Problem Solving. , 1982 .

[32]  M. L. Emiliani,et al.  Improving business school courses by applying lean principles and practices , 2004 .

[33]  E. Bayraktar,et al.  An instrument for measuring the critical factors of TQM in Turkish higher education , 2008 .

[34]  John R. Shook,et al.  Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Create Value and , 1998 .

[35]  Kyle B. Stone.  Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review , 2012 .

[36]  A. Gurumurthy,et al.  Leanness assessment: a literature review , 2016 .

[37]  Jiju Antony,et al.  Readiness factors for the Lean Six Sigma journey in the higher education sector , 2014 .

[38]  Linda R. LaGanga.  Lean service operations: Reflections and new directions for capacity expansion in outpatient clinics , 2011 .

[39]  Shannon Flumerfelt,et al.  Using Lean in the Flipped Classroom for At Risk Students , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[40]  Sandra Furterer.  Lean Six Sigma in Service : Applications and Case Studies , 2009 .

[41]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Lean principles, learning, and knowledge work: Evidence from a software services provider , 2011 .