The physical basis of how prion conformations determine strain phenotypes

A principle that has emerged from studies of protein aggregation is that proteins typically can misfold into a range of different aggregated forms. Moreover, the phenotypic and pathological consequences of protein aggregation depend critically on the specific misfolded form. A striking example of this is the prion strain phenomenon, in which prion particles composed of the same protein cause distinct heritable states. Accumulating evidence from yeast prions such as [PSI+] and mammalian prions argues that differences in the prion conformation underlie prion strain variants. Nonetheless, it remains poorly understood why changes in the conformation of misfolded proteins alter their physiological effects. Here we present and experimentally validate an analytical model describing how [PSI+] strain phenotypes arise from the dynamic interaction among the effects of prion dilution, competition for a limited pool of soluble protein, and conformation-dependent differences in prion growth and division rates. Analysis of three distinct prion conformations of yeast Sup35 (the [PSI+] protein determinant) and their in vivo phenotypes reveals that the Sup35 amyloid causing the strongest phenotype surprisingly shows the slowest growth. This slow growth, however, is more than compensated for by an increased brittleness that promotes prion division. The propensity of aggregates to undergo breakage, thereby generating new seeds, probably represents a key determinant of their physiological impact for both infectious (prion) and non-infectious amyloids.

[1]  J. Weissman,et al.  Molecular Basis of a Yeast Prion Species Barrier , 2000, Cell.

[2]  M. Tuite,et al.  Guanidine Hydrochloride Inhibits the Generation of Prion “Seeds” but Not Prion Protein Aggregation in Yeast , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[3]  R. Wickner,et al.  Interactions among prions and prion “strains” in yeast , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  D. Hall,et al.  Silent prions lying in wait: a two-hit model of prion/amyloid formation and infection. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  M. Tuite,et al.  The elimination of the yeast [PSI+] prion by guanidine hydrochloride is the result of Hsp104 inactivation , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[6]  V. Smirnov,et al.  [PSI+] prion generation in yeast: characterization of the ‘strain’ difference , 2001, Yeast.

[7]  F. Cohen,et al.  Synthetic Mammalian Prions , 2004, Science.

[8]  G. J. Raymond,et al.  The most infectious prion protein particles , 2005, Nature.

[9]  Adam Douglass,et al.  Mechanism of Prion Propagation: Amyloid Growth Occurs by Monomer Addition , 2004, PLoS biology.

[10]  J. Collinge Prion diseases of humans and animals: their causes and molecular basis. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  M A Nowak,et al.  Quantifying the kinetic parameters of prion replication. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[12]  M. Tuite,et al.  Propagating prions in fungi and mammals. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[13]  D. Masison,et al.  Guanidine Hydrochloride Inhibits Hsp104 Activity In Vivo: A Possible Explanation for Its Effect in Curing Yeast Prions , 2001, Current Microbiology.

[14]  Charles Weissmann,et al.  The state of the prion , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[15]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Structural insights into a yeast prion illuminate nucleation and strain diversity , 2005, Nature.

[16]  M. Tuite,et al.  Analysis of the generation and segregation of propagons: entities that propagate the [PSI+] prion in yeast. , 2003, Genetics.

[17]  Roger Cooke,et al.  Conformational variations in an infectious protein determine prion strain differences , 2004, Nature.

[18]  R. Wickner,et al.  [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1994, Science.

[19]  J. Weissman,et al.  Origins and kinetic consequences of diversity in Sup35 yeast prion fibers , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[20]  D. Kryndushkin,et al.  Yeast [PSI+] Prion Aggregates Are Formed by Small Sup35 Polymers Fragmented by Hsp104* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  C. Dobson Protein folding and misfolding , 2003, Nature.

[22]  M. Ter‐Avanesyan,et al.  Structure and Replication of Yeast Prions , 1998, Cell.

[23]  U. Baxa,et al.  Prion generation in vitro: amyloid of Ure2p is infectious , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[24]  J. Castilla,et al.  In Vitro Generation of Infectious Scrapie Prions , 2005, Cell.

[25]  Susan Lindquist,et al.  Prions as adaptive conduits of memory and inheritance , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[26]  R. Diaz-Avalos,et al.  Protein-only transmission of three yeast prion strains , 2004, Nature.

[27]  Y. Chernoff,et al.  Genesis and variability of [PSI] prion factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Genetics.

[28]  J. Weissman,et al.  Mechanism of Cross-Species Prion Transmission An Infectious Conformation Compatible withTwo Highly Divergent Yeast Prion Proteins , 2005, Cell.

[29]  P. Lansbury,et al.  Protofibrils, pores, fibrils, and neurodegeneration: separating the responsible protein aggregates from the innocent bystanders. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[30]  P. Satpute-Krishnan,et al.  Prion protein remodelling confers an immediate phenotypic switch , 2005, Nature.