Sustainable livestock production: Low emission farm – The innovative combination of nutrient, emission and waste management with special emphasis on Chinese pig production

Global livestock production is going to be more and more sophisticated in order to improve efficiency needed to supply the rising demand for animal protein of a growing, more urban and affluent population. To cope with the rising public importance of sustainability is a big challenge for all animal farmers and more industrialized operations especially. Confined animal farming operations (CAFO) are seen very critical by many consumers with regard to their sustainability performance, however, the need to improve the sustainability performance especially in the ecological and social dimension exists at both ends of the intensity, i.e., also for the small holder and family owned animal farming models. As in livestock operations, feed and manure contribute the majority to the three most critical environmental impact categories global warming potential (GWP), acidification (AP) and eutrophication potential (EP) any effort for improvement should start there. Intelligent combination of nutrient-, emission- and waste management in an integrated low emission farm (LEF) concept not only significantly reduces the environmental footprint in the ecological dimension of sustainability, but by producing renewable energy (heat, electricity, biomethane) with animal manure as major feedstock in an anaerobic digester also the economic dimension can be improved. Model calculations using new software show the ecological improvement potential of low protein diets using more supplemented amino acids for the Chinese pig production. The ecological impact of producing biogas or upgraded biomethane, of further treatment of the digestate and producing defined fertilizers is discussed. Finally, the LEF concept allows the integration of an insect protein plant module which offers additional ecological and economical sustainability improvement potential in the future. Active stakeholder communication about implementation steps of LEF examples improves also the social aspect of sustainability.

[1]  J. V. van Loon,et al.  An Exploration on Greenhouse Gas and Ammonia Production by Insect Species Suitable for Animal or Human Consumption , 2010, PloS one.

[2]  A. Aarnink,et al.  Odour and ammonia emission from pig manure as affected by dietary crude protein level , 2009 .

[3]  W. Powers,et al.  Feeding reduced crude protein diets with crystalline amino acids supplementation reduce air gas emissions from housing. , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[4]  M. D. Vries,et al.  Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments , 2010 .

[5]  D. Massé,et al.  On farm biogas production: a method to reduce GHG emissions and develop more sustainable livestock operations. , 2011 .

[6]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation , 2013, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[7]  J. Neufeld,et al.  The State of Food and Agriculture , 1970 .

[8]  Gilles Tran,et al.  State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. , 2014 .

[9]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.

[10]  D. Oonincx,et al.  Environmental Impact of the Production of Mealworms as a Protein Source for Humans – A Life Cycle Assessment , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Insects in animal feed: Acceptance and its determinants among farmers, agriculture sector stakeholders and citizens , 2015 .

[12]  J. Dourmad,et al.  Development of a calculation model for predicting the amount of N excreted by the pig: effect of feeding, physiological stage and performance , 1992 .

[13]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock : a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities , 2013 .

[14]  H. Xin,et al.  COMPARISON OF AIR EMISSIONS FROM RAW LIQUID PIG MANURE AND BIOGAS DIGESTER EFFLUENT STORAGES , 2014 .

[15]  A. Rotz,et al.  Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production - A review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions , 2013 .

[16]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from pig and chicken supply chains – a global life cycle assessment , 2013 .

[17]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Livestock's Long Shadow , 2006 .

[18]  R. Dalgaard The environmental impact of pork production from a life cycle perspective , 2007 .

[19]  H. V. D. van der Werf,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using Life Cycle Assessment. , 2011, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[20]  A.J.A. Aarnink,et al.  Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from slurry of growing-finishing pigs. , 1998 .

[21]  Guoyao Wu Dietary requirements of synthesizable amino acids by animals: a paradigm shift in protein nutrition , 2014, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology.

[22]  O. Schlüter,et al.  Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production , 2013 .

[23]  J. Ryschawy,et al.  Evaluating environmental impacts of contrasting pig farming systems with life cycle assessment. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[24]  A. Ogino,et al.  Greenhouse gas reduction and improved sustainability of animal husbandry using amino acids in swine, poultry feeds. , 2013, Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho.

[25]  A. Woitowitz Auswirkungen einer Einschränkung des Verzehrs von Lebensmitteln tierischer Herkunft auf ausgewählte Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren - dargestellt am Beispiel konventioneller und ökologischer Wirtschaftsweise , 2007 .

[26]  J. van Milgen,et al.  The use of free amino acids allows formulating very low crude protein diets for piglets. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[27]  F. G. Barroso,et al.  Insect meal as renewable source of food for animal feeding: a review , 2014 .

[28]  K. Möller,et al.  The effect of biogas digestion on the environmental impact and energy balances in organic cropping systems using the life-cycle assessment methodology , 2010, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems.

[29]  Helena Elmquist,et al.  Environmental Systems Analysis of Pig Production - The Impact of Feed Choice (12 pp) , 2005 .

[30]  S. Amaducci,et al.  Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of pork production: A data inventory for the case of Germany , 2013 .

[32]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.

[33]  J. Y. Dourmad,et al.  Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in pig production using Life Cycle Assessment , 2014 .

[34]  Petr Stehlík,et al.  Biogas Upgrading Techniques: State of Art Review in European Region , 2013 .

[35]  K. Möller Effects of anaerobic digestion on soil carbon and nitrogen turnover, N emissions, and soil biological activity. A review , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[36]  I. Shinzato,et al.  Potential reduction of greenhouse gas emission from swine manure by using a low-protein diet supplemented with synthetic amino acids , 2011 .

[37]  M. Finkbeiner,et al.  Environmental impact of using specialty feed ingredients in swine and poultry production: A life cycle assessment. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[38]  D. Vallero,et al.  The Sustainability Imperative , 2008 .

[39]  Luca Carraro,et al.  Growth performance of heavy pigs fed restrictively diets with decreasing crude protein and indispensable amino acids content , 2014 .

[40]  Takashi Osada,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Japanese pig farming using low-protein diet supplemented with amino acids , 2013 .