More time for complex consultations in a high-deprivation practice is associated with increased patient enablement.

BACKGROUND Evidence of the beneficial effects of longer consultations in general practice is limited. AIM To evaluate the effect of increasing consultation length on patient enablement in general practice in an area of extreme socioeconomic deprivation. DESIGN OF STUDY Longitudinal study using a 'before and after' design. SETTING Keppoch Medical Centre in Glasgow, which serves the most deprived practice area in Scotland. METHOD Participants were 300 adult patients at baseline, before the introduction of longer consultations, and 324 at follow-up, more than 1 year after the introduction of longer consultations. The intervention studied was more time in complex consultations. Patient satisfaction, perceptions of the GPs' empathy, GP stress, and patient enablement were collected by face-to-face interview. Additional qualitative data were obtained by individual interviews with the GPs, relating to their perceptions of the impact of the longer consultations. RESULTS Response rates of 70% were obtained. Overall, 53% of consultations were complex. GP stress was higher in complex consultations. Patient satisfaction and perception of the GPs' empathy were consistently high. Average consultation length in complex consultations was increased by 2.5 minutes by the intervention. GP stress in consultations was decreased after the introduction of longer consultations, and patient enablement was increased. GPs' views endorsed these findings, with more anticipatory and coordinated care being possible in the longer consultations. CONCLUSION More resource to provide more time in complex consultations in an area of extreme deprivation is associated with an increase in patient enablement.

[1]  J. Gunn,et al.  Do longer consultations improve the management of psychological problems in general practice? A systematic literature review , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[2]  S. Mercer,et al.  Quality in general practice consultations; a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland , 2007, BMC family practice.

[3]  S. Childs,et al.  The effect of interventions to alter the consultation length of family physicians: a systematic review. , 2006, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[4]  S. Mercer,et al.  CQI-2--a new measure of holistic interpersonal care in primary care consultations. , 2006, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[5]  A. Wilson,et al.  Effects of interventions aimed at changing the length of primary care physicians' consultation. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[6]  G. Watt,et al.  Deprivation and volunteering by general practices: cross sectional analysis of a national primary care system , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  S. Mercer,et al.  Holism in primary care: the views of Scotland's general practitioners , 2005, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[8]  G. Watt,et al.  Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice. , 2005, Family practice.

[9]  David Heaney,et al.  The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. , 2004, Family practice.

[10]  G. Watt,et al.  The importance of empathy in the enablement of patients attending the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[11]  Jan De Maeseneer,et al.  Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  G. Watt The inverse care law today , 2002, The Lancet.

[13]  G. Freeman,et al.  Evolving general practice consultation in Britain: issues of length and context , 2002, British medical journal.

[14]  S. Payne,et al.  Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[15]  M O Roland,et al.  Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  A. McConnachie,et al.  Deprivation, psychological distress, and consultation length in general practice. , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[17]  G. Freeman,et al.  Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey , 1999, BMJ.

[18]  A. Porter,et al.  Attitudes to medical care, the organization of work, and stress among general practitioners. , 1992, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[19]  R. Chambers Longer booking intervals in general practice: effects on doctors' stress and arousal. , 1991, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[20]  A. Porter,et al.  Measurement of stress as it affects the work of the general practitioner. , 1985, Family practice.

[21]  J. E. Jameson Inverse care law. , 1971, Lancet.

[22]  A. Ratcliffe,et al.  Scottish indices of deprivation 2003 , 2003 .

[23]  C. Sadler Delivering health. , 1990, Nursing times.