Perceiving the Orientation in Depth of Real Surfaces: Background Pattern Affects Motion and Pictorial Information

Motion information contributes weakly to veridical depth perception of real stimuli. To test whether background pattern might enhance veridicality, observers judged the orientations in depth of pictorially matched trapezoidal and rectangular surfaces, with and without a rectangular grid of vertical stripes in a frontal plane behind surfaces; viewing was monocular with lateral head motions of 15 cm extent. The grid did not enhance veridicality; instead, surfaces actually or pictorially slanted to the frontal plane were judged more slanted with the grid present. In a second experiment, observers were static or moved through 30 cm; the grid had little effect during stasis, but again elicited judgments of greater slant during motion, despite broadly veridical responses without the grid. Results from actual slant are interpreted in terms of motion contrast and suggest that motion information may be important in conveying differences in orientation. Results from pictorial slant suggest that the influence of pictorial information increases as its complexity increases.

[1]  B. Rogers,et al.  Simultaneous and Successive Contrast Effects in the Perception of Depth from Motion-Parallax and Stereoscopic Information , 1982, Perception.

[2]  A. Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  Aftereffect of visual movement—the role of relative movement: A review , 1987 .

[3]  London,et al.  The Ames Demonstrations in Perception , 1953 .

[4]  W. Gehringer,et al.  Effect of ecological viewing conditions on the Ames' distorted room illusion. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  R. B. Freeman,et al.  Detectability of motion as a factor in depth perception by monocular movement parallax , 1977 .

[6]  W. Simpson.  Optic flow and depth perception. , 1993, Spatial vision.

[7]  A. Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  Induced movement in the visual modality: an overview. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  D. Weintraub,et al.  Fragments of Delboeuf and Ebbinghaus illusions: Contour/context explorations of misjudged circle size , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  N J Wade,et al.  On Interocular Transfer of the Movement Aftereffect in Individuals with and without Normal Binocular Vision , 1976, Perception.

[10]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[11]  H. Ono,et al.  Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  E. Sture Eriksson.  Movement parallax during locomotion , 1974 .

[13]  A. Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  Detecting slant-in-depth of real trapezoidal and rectangular surfaces: moving-monocular viewing equivalent to stationary-binocular viewing. , 1993, The Journal of general psychology.

[14]  B J Rogers,et al.  Visual and nonvisual information disambiguate surfaces specified by motion parallax , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  A. Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  Primary depth cues and background pattern in the portrayal of slant. , 1992, The Journal of general psychology.

[16]  S. H. Ferris.  Motion parallax and absolute distance. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  A H Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  Perceiving Surface Orientation: Pictorial Information Based on Rectangularity Can Be Overriden during Observer Motion , 1993, Perception.

[18]  W. Hell,et al.  Movement parallax: An asymptotic function of amplitude and velocity of head motion , 1978, Vision Research.

[19]  A H Reinhardt-Rutland,et al.  Detecting orientation of a surface: the rectangularity postulate and primary depth cues. , 1990, The Journal of general psychology.

[20]  A. Reinhardt-Rutland.  Induced movement in the visual modality: an overview. , 1988 .

[21]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[22]  B. Rogers,et al.  Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception , 1982, Vision Research.