Analysis and Interpretation of the Cramér-Rao Lower-Bound in Astrometry: One-Dimensional Case

In this paper we explore the maximum precision attainable in the location of a point source imaged by a pixel array detector in the presence of a background, as a function of the detector properties. For this we use a well-known result from parametric estimation theory, the so-called Cramer-Rao lower bound. We develop the expressions in the 1-dimensional case of a linear array detector in which the only unknown parameter is the source position. If the object is oversampled by the detector, analytical expressions can be obtained for the Cramer-Rao limit that can be readily used to estimate the limiting precision of an imaging system, and which are very useful for experimental (detector) design, observational planning, or performance estimation of data analysis software: In particular, we demonstrate that for background-dominated sources, the maximum astrometric precision goes as $B/F^2$, where $B$ is the background in one pixel, and $F$ is the total flux of the source, while when the background is negligible, this precision goes as $F^{-1}$. We also explore the dependency of the astrometric precision on: (1) the size of the source (as imaged by the detector), (2) the pixel detector size, and (3) the effect of source de-centering. Putting these results into context, the theoretical Cramer-Rao lower bound is compared to both ground- as well as spaced-based astrometric results, indicating that current techniques approach this limit very closely. Our results indicate that we have found in the Cramer-Rao lower variance bound a very powerful astrometric "benchmark" estimator concerning the maximum expected positional precision for a point source, given a prescription for the source, the background, the detector characteristics, and the detection process.

[1]  William H. Press,et al.  Book-Review - Numerical Recipes in Pascal - the Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[2]  van Altena,et al.  Astrometry for Astrophysics , 2013 .

[3]  C. Mackay Charge-Coupled Devices in Astronomy , 1986 .

[4]  Ivan R. King,et al.  THE PROFILE OF A STAR IMAGE , 1971 .

[5]  Steve B. Howell,et al.  Handbook of CCD Astronomy: Contents , 2006 .

[6]  CCD star images: On the determination of Moffat’s PSF shape parameters , 1988 .

[7]  R. Mendez,et al.  FIRST GROUND-BASED CHARGE-COUPLED DEVICE PROPER MOTIONS FOR FORNAX. II. FINAL RESULTS , 2011, 1108.3141.

[8]  W. F. van Altena,et al.  Digital image centering. II. , 1978 .

[9]  S. Howell Astronomical CCD observing and reduction techniques , 1992 .

[10]  A. S. Fruchter,et al.  Drizzle: A Method for the Linear Reconstruction of Undersampled Images , 1998 .

[11]  Jay Anderson,et al.  Toward High‐Precision Astrometry with WFPC2. I. Deriving an Accurate Point‐Spread Function , 2000, astro-ph/0006325.

[12]  Anton M. Koekemoer,et al.  The 2005 HST Calibration Workshop Hubble After the Transition to Two-Gyro Mode , 2006 .

[13]  Byron P. Roe,et al.  Probability and Statistics in Experimental Physics , 1992 .

[14]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image Processing Techniques , 1973, Other Conferences.

[15]  M. Kendall,et al.  Classical inference and the linear model , 1999 .

[16]  R. Stone A Comparison of Digital Centering Algorithms , 1989 .

[17]  Steve B. Howell,et al.  Handbook of CCD Astronomy , 2000 .

[18]  Kim A. Winick,et al.  Cramér–Rao lower bounds on the performance of charge-coupled-device optical position estimators , 1986 .

[19]  W. F. van Altena,et al.  Digital Image Centering, I , 1975 .

[20]  P. S. Bunclark,et al.  Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems , 2008 .

[21]  Martin Altmann,et al.  Proper Motions of Local Group Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies I: First Ground-Based Results for Fornax , 2010 .

[22]  Jean-Luc Starck,et al.  Astronomical Data Analysis , 2007 .

[23]  W. F. van Altena,et al.  Theoretical studies of the effects of grain noise on photographic stellar astrometry and photometry. , 1983 .