Endogenous Probabilistic Reserve Sizing and Allocation in Unit Commitment Models: Cost-Effective, Reliable, and Fast

In power systems with high shares of variable and limitedly predictable renewables, power system operators need to schedule flexible load, generation, and storage to maintain the power system balance when forecast errors occur. To ensure a reliable and cost-effective power system operation, novel reserve sizing and allocation methods are needed. Although stochastic formulations of the unit commitment (UC) problem allow calculating an optimal trade-off between the cost of scheduling and activating reserves, load shedding and curtailment, these models may become computationally intractable for real-life power systems. Therefore, in this paper, we develop a novel set of probabilistic reserve constraints, which allows internalizing the reserve sizing and allocation problem in a deterministic UC model, considering the full cost of reserve allocation and activation. Extensive numerical simulations show that this novel formulation yields UC schedules that are nearly as cost-effective as the theoretical optimal solution of the stochastic model in calculation times similar to that of a deterministic equivalent.

[1]  Johan Driesen,et al.  Dynamic operating reserve strategies for wind power integration , 2014 .

[2]  C.R. Philbrick,et al.  Modeling Approaches for Computational Cost Reduction in Stochastic Unit Commitment Formulations , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Optimizing the spinning reserve requirements using a cost/benefit analysis , 2008, PES 2008.

[4]  Daniel Kirschen,et al.  Comparison of scenario reduction techniques for the stochastic unit commitment , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[5]  Javier Contreras,et al.  A Chance-Constrained Unit Commitment With an $n-K$ Security Criterion and Significant Wind Generation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Kenneth Bruninx,et al.  Improved Modeling of Unit Commitment Decisions under Uncertainty , 2016 .

[7]  Ralf Gollmer,et al.  Stochastic Power Generation Unit Commitment in Electricity Markets: A Novel Formulation and a Comparison of Solution Methods , 2009, Oper. Res..

[8]  Michal Kaut,et al.  Evaluation of scenario-generation methods for stochastic programming , 2007 .

[9]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Coupling Pumped Hydro Energy Storage With Unit Commitment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[10]  Melvyn Sim,et al.  The Price of Robustness , 2004, Oper. Res..

[11]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Redispatching in an interconnected electricity system with high renewables penetration , 2015 .

[12]  Yang Wang,et al.  Unit Commitment With Volatile Node Injections by Using Interval Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  John R. Birge,et al.  A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem , 1996 .

[14]  Kenneth Bruninx,et al.  A Statistical Description of the Error on Wind Power Forecasts for Probabilistic Reserve Sizing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[15]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  Toward scalable, parallel progressive hedging for stochastic unit commitment , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[16]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Effect of time resolution on unit commitment decisions in systems with high wind penetration , 2014, 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition.

[17]  J F Restrepo,et al.  Assessing the Yearly Impact of Wind Power Through a New Hybrid Deterministic/Stochastic Unit Commitment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[18]  M. O'Malley,et al.  The importance of sub-hourly modeling with a high penetration of wind generation , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[19]  K. Bruninx,et al.  Scenario reduction techniques and solution stability for stochastic unit commitment problems , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON).

[20]  Anthony Papavasiliou,et al.  Applying High Performance Computing to Transmission-Constrained Stochastic Unit Commitment for Renewable Energy Integration , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Gintaras V. Reklaitis,et al.  Operating reserve policies with high wind power penetration , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[22]  Xu Andy Sun,et al.  Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Security Constrained Unit Commitment Problem , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[23]  H. Madsen,et al.  From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short-term wind power production , 2009 .

[24]  B. Norman,et al.  A solution to the stochastic unit commitment problem using chance constrained programming , 2004 .

[25]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  Toward scalable stochastic unit commitment , 2015 .

[26]  Damian Flynn,et al.  Transmission, Variable Generation, and Power System Flexibility , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  A. Conejo,et al.  Scenario Reduction for Futures Market Trading in Electricity Markets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[28]  A. Papavasiliou,et al.  Reserve Requirements for Wind Power Integration: A Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming Framework , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[29]  Werner Römisch,et al.  Unit commitment in power generation – a basic model and some extensions , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..

[30]  N. Cox Statistical Models in Engineering , 1970 .

[31]  Yongpei Guan,et al.  Uncertainty Sets for Robust Unit Commitment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.