Cardiac Motion Estimation Using a ProActive Deformable Model: Evaluation and Sensitivity Analysis

To regularize cardiac motion recovery from medical images, electromechanical models are increasingly popular for providing a priori physiological motion information. Although these models are macroscopic, there are still many parameters to be specified for accurate and robust recovery. In this paper, we provide a sensitivity analysis of a proactive electromechanical model-based cardiac motion tracking framework by studying the impacts of its model parameters. Our sensitivity analysis differs from other works by evaluating the motion recovery through a synthetic image sequence with known displacement field as well as cine and tagged MRI sequences. This analysis helps to identify which parameters should be estimated from patient-specific data and which ones can have their values set from the literature.

[1]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Block Matching: A General Framework to Improve Robustness of Rigid Registration of Medical Images , 2000, MICCAI.

[2]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association , 2002, The international journal of cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2009 , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  Branislav Jaramaz,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2000 , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  An Integrated Platform for Dynamic Cardiac Simulation and Image Processing: Application to Personalised Tetralogy of Fallot Simulation , 2008, VCBM.

[6]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[7]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  An electromechanical model of the heart for image analysis and simulation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  D. Chapelle,et al.  MODELING AND ESTIMATION OF THE CARDIAC ELECTROMECHANICAL ACTIVITY , 2006 .

[9]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart, 5th International Conference, FIMH 2009, Nice, France, June 3-5, 2009. Proceedings , 2009, Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart.

[10]  Kawal S. Rhode,et al.  The Importance of Model Parameters and Boundary Conditions in Whole Organ Models of Cardiac Contraction , 2009, FIMH.

[11]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Biomechanically-Constrained 4D Estimation of Myocardial Motion , 2009, MICCAI.

[12]  Martyn P. Nash,et al.  Mechanics and material properties of the heart using an anatomically accurate mathematical model. , 1998 .

[13]  Pengcheng Shi,et al.  Physiome-model-based state-space framework for cardiac deformation recovery. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[14]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  An Anisotropic Multi-front Fast Marching Method for Real-Time Simulation of Cardiac Electrophysiology , 2007, FIMH.