Informed consent in experimentation involving mentally impaired persons: ethical issues.

The problem of experimentation involving subjects whose mental condition prevents them from understanding information and providing proper informed consent has been addressed in various codes, declarations, conventions, treaties and regulations adopted by national, international and supranational institutions and authorities. This article summarizes the basic ethical criteria these documents provide and stresses the historical development from the nearly total exclusion of incapacitated subjects, established in the mid-twentieth century, to their contemporary inclusion in clinical trials on certain ethical conditions. The problem of proxy consent by legal representatives for participation in clinical trials is addressed particularly in reference to current Italian regulations. Exceptions to human experimentation requirements in emergency situations are also briefly discussed.

[1]  Aart Hendriks,et al.  Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. , 2000, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[2]  James M. Orten,et al.  Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals , 1950 .

[3]  D. Tucker.  Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment: A Guide for Physicians and Other Health Professionals , 1998 .

[4]  C. Stocking,et al.  Ethics Reporting in Publications About Research with Alzheimer's Disease Patients , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  Paul S. Appelbaum,et al.  Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decisionmaking capacity. , 2002, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[6]  G. Sachs.  Informed Consent for Research on Human Subjects with Dementia , 1998, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  S. Athar.  Principles of Biomedical Ethics , 2011, The Journal of IMA.

[8]  S. Eckstein.  The ethical conduct of research on the mentally incapacitated , 2003 .

[9]  P. Appelbaum.  Clinical practice. Assessment of patients' competence to consent to treatment. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  W. Curran,et al.  Ethics in medicine. Historical perspectives and contemporary concerns , 1978, Medical History.

[11]  M. Hotopf,et al.  Mental capacity to make decisions on treatment in people admitted to psychiatric hospitals: cross sectional study , 2008, British medical journal.

[12]  Z. Bankowski,et al.  Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences , 1991 .

[13]  R. Mccance.  The Practice of Experimental Medicine , 1951, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[14]  P. Rabins,et al.  Informed consent for dementia research: the study enrollment encounter. , 2007, IRB.

[15]  V. Potter,et al.  Bioethics: bridge to the future , 1971 .

[16]  V. Potter.  Bioethics, the Science of Survival , 2015 .

[17]  Sec.,et al.  PART 50—PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS , 2000 .

[18]  R. Ho,et al.  Principles and practice of clinical research , 2002 .

[19]  World Medical Association (WMA),et al.  Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects , 2009, Journal of the Indian Medical Association.

[20]  J. Abraham.  The international conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use , 2009 .

[21]  B. Kapp,et al.  A history and theory of informed consent , 1986 .

[22]  C. Grady,et al.  What makes clinical research ethical? , 2000, JAMA.

[23]  L. Sher.  Hippocratic Oath , 1996, The Lancet.

[24]  Guidelines for assessing the decision-making capacities of potential research subjects with cognitive impairment. American Psychiatric Association. , 1998, The American journal of psychiatry.

[25]  D. Jeste,et al.  Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments. , 2006, The American journal of psychiatry.

[26]  J. Bion,et al.  Medical research involving incapacitated adults: implications of the EU Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC. , 2006, Medical law review.