Formal and heuristic system decomposition methods in multidisciplinary synthesis. Ph.D. Thesis, 1991

The multidisciplinary interactions which exist in large scale engineering design problems provide a unique set of difficulties. These difficulties are associated primarily with unwieldy numbers of design variables and constraints, and with the interdependencies of the discipline analysis modules. Such obstacles require design techniques which account for the inherent disciplinary couplings in the analyses and optimizations. The objective of this work was to develop an efficient holistic design synthesis methodology that takes advantage of the synergistic nature of integrated design. A general decomposition approach for optimization of large engineering systems is presented. The method is particularly applicable for multidisciplinary design problems which are characterized by closely coupled interactions among discipline analyses. The advantage of subsystem modularity allows for implementation of specialized methods for analysis and optimization, computational efficiency, and the ability to incorporate human intervention and decision making in the form of an expert systems capability. The resulting approach is not a method applicable to only a specific situation, but rather, a methodology which can be used for a large class of engineering design problems in which the system is non-hierarchic in nature.

[1]  Garret N. Vanderplaats,et al.  Numerical Optimization Techniques for Engineering Design: With Applications , 1984 .

[2]  Robert E. Fulton,et al.  Application of computer-aided aircraft design in a multidisciplinary environment. , 1974 .

[3]  George Gerard,et al.  Minimum weight analysis of compression structures , 1956 .

[4]  T. Kicher,et al.  Structural synthesis of integrally stiffened cylinders. , 1967 .

[5]  J. Foulkes,et al.  The minimum-weight design of structural frames , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[6]  M. J. Ferebee.  IDEAS: A multidisciplinary computer-aided conceptual design system for spacecraft , 1984 .

[7]  Douglass J. Wilde,et al.  Globally optimal design , 1978 .

[8]  Loren A. Lemmerman.  Optimization in the systems engineering process , 1984 .

[9]  F. R. Shanley,et al.  Weight-strength analysis of aircraft structures , 1960 .

[10]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  A quasi-procedural, knowledge-based system for aircraft design , 1988 .

[11]  Ronald A. Gellatly,et al.  Development of Procedures for Large Scale Automated Minimum Weight Structural Design. Supplement 1. Programmer Documentation. , 1968 .

[12]  M. M. Hurwitz,et al.  Role of optimization in interdisciplinary analyses of naval structures , 1984 .

[13]  William Prager,et al.  Minimum-Weight Design of a Portal Frame , 1956 .

[14]  James L. Tocher,et al.  Automatic Design of Optimum Hole Reinforcement , 1968 .

[15]  J. Barthelemy,et al.  Two point exponential approximation method for structural optimization , 1990 .

[16]  J. Heyman.  Plastic design of beams and plane frames for minimum material consumption , 1951 .

[17]  L. Schmit,et al.  Approximation concepts for efficient structural synthesis , 1976 .

[18]  Bertram Klein.  Direct Use of Extremal Principles in Solving Certain Optimizing Problems Involving Inequalities , 1955, Oper. Res..

[19]  P. Hajela,et al.  The controlled growth method - A tool for structural optimization , 1981 .

[20]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1987 .

[21]  R. E. Griffith,et al.  A Nonlinear Programming Technique for the Optimization of Continuous Processing Systems , 1961 .