Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila

Selection of appropriate oviposition sites is essential for progeny survival and fitness in generalist insect species, such as Drosphila melanogaster, yet little is known about the mechanisms regulating how environmental conditions and innate adult preferences are evaluated and balanced to yield the final substrate choice for egg-deposition. Female D. melanogaster are attracted to food containing acetic acid (AA) as an oviposition substrate. However, our observations reveal that this egg-laying preference is a complex process, as it directly opposes an otherwise strong, default behavior of positional avoidance for the same food. We show that 2 distinct sensory modalities detect AA. Attraction to AA-containing food for the purpose of egg-laying relies on the gustatory system, while positional repulsion depends primarily on the olfactory system. Similarly, distinct central brain regions are involved in AA attraction and repulsion. Given this unique situation, in which a single environmental stimulus yields 2 opposing behavioral outputs, we propose that the interaction of egg-laying attraction and positional aversion for AA provides a powerful model for studying how organisms balance competing behavioral drives and integrate signals involved in choice-like processes.

[1]  E. Kubli Sex-peptides: seminal peptides of the Drosophila male , 2003, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[2]  T. Awasaki,et al.  pox-neuro is required for development of chemosensory bristles in Drosophila. , 1997, Journal of neurobiology.

[3]  J. David,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Drosophila sechelliaSpecialization: Oviposition Behavior Toward the Major Aliphatic Acids of Its Host Plant , 1998, Behavior genetics.

[4]  Kristin Scott,et al.  The detection of carbonation by the Drosophila gustatory system , 2007, Nature.

[5]  J. Barker,et al.  Genotype-specific habitat selection for oviposition sites in the cactophilic species Drosophila buzzatii , 1994, Heredity.

[6]  U. Heberlein,et al.  Distinct Behavioral Responses to Ethanol Are Regulated by Alternate RhoGAP18B Isoforms , 2006, Cell.

[7]  R. Strauss,et al.  Analysis of a spatial orientation memory in Drosophila , 2008, Nature.

[8]  David J. Anderson,et al.  A single population of olfactory sensory neurons mediates an innate avoidance behaviour in Drosophila , 2004, Nature.

[9]  K. T. Eisses The Influence of 2-Propanol and Acetone on Oviposition Rate and Oviposition Site Preference for Acetic Acid and Ethanol of Drosophila melanogaster , 1997, Behavior genetics.

[10]  Daisuke Haba,et al.  Behavioral analyses of mutants for two odorant-binding protein genes, Obp57d and Obp57e, in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2008, Genes & genetic systems.

[11]  M. Heisenberg Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  H. Laudien,et al.  Ökologische Prägung und Proteinbiosynthese. Versuche mit Drosophila melanogaster Meigen , 2010 .

[13]  R. Menzel,et al.  A new ascending sensory tract to the calyces of the honeybee mushroom body, the subesophageal‐calycal tract , 2003, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  M. Noll,et al.  The Drosophila Pox neuro gene: control of male courtship behavior and fertility as revealed by a complete dissection of all enhancers , 2002, Development.

[15]  B. K. Mitchell,et al.  Peripheral and central structures involved in insect gustation , 1999, Microscopy research and technique.

[16]  P. Parsons Acetic Acid Vapour as a Resource and Stress in Drosophila , 1982 .

[17]  Y. Fuyama,et al.  Genetics of food preference in Drosophila sechellia. I. Responses to food attractants. , 1993, Genetica.

[18]  L. Luo,et al.  Representation of the Glomerular Olfactory Map in the Drosophila Brain , 2002, Cell.

[19]  Y. Fuyama,et al.  Behavior genetics of olfactory responses inDrosophila. I. Olfactometry and strain differences inDrosophila melanogaster , 1976, Behavior genetics.

[20]  Y. Fuyama,et al.  Odorant-Binding Proteins OBP57d and OBP57e Affect Taste Perception and Host-Plant Preference in Drosophila sechellia , 2007, PLoS biology.

[21]  J. David,et al.  Genetics of a nonoptimal behavior: Oviposition preference ofDrosophila mauritiana for a toxic resource , 1994, Behavior genetics.

[22]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Odor Coding in the Drosophila Antenna , 2001, Neuron.

[23]  Reinhard F. Stocker,et al.  The organization of the chemosensory system in Drosophila melanogaster: a rewiew , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[24]  J. Ringo,et al.  OVIPOSITION SITE SELECTION BY DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER AND DROSOPHILA SIMULANS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  T. Kitamoto Conditional modification of behavior in Drosophila by targeted expression of a temperature-sensitive shibire allele in defined neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurobiology.

[26]  Troy Zars,et al.  Behavioral functions of the insect mushroom bodies , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  E. Hafen,et al.  Drosophila Egg-Laying Site Selection as a System to Study Simple Decision-Making Processes , 2008, Science.

[28]  B. Possidente,et al.  Quantitative Genetic Variation for Oviposition Preference with Respect to Phenylthiocarbamide in Drosophila melanogaster , 1999, Behavior genetics.

[29]  J. Carlson,et al.  Candidate taste receptors in Drosophila. , 2000, Science.

[30]  L. Vosshall,et al.  Influence of odorant receptor repertoire on odor perception in humans and fruit flies , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Janet L. Gerking,et al.  Oviposition site preference inDrosophila , 1979, Behavior genetics.