Auditory risk of air rifles

Abstract Objective: To characterize the impulse noise exposure and auditory risk for air rifle users for both youth and adults. Design: Acoustic characteristics were examined and the auditory risk estimates were evaluated using contemporary damage-risk criteria for unprotected adult listeners and the 120-dB peak limit and LAeq75 exposure limit suggested by the World Health Organization (1999) for children. Study sample: Impulses were generated by nine pellet air rifles and one BB air rifle. Results: None of the air rifles generated peak levels that exceeded the 140 dB peak limit for adults, and eight (80%) exceeded the 120 dB peak SPL limit for youth. In general, for both adults and youth, there is minimal auditory risk when shooting fewer than 100 unprotected shots with pellet air rifles. Air rifles with suppressors were less hazardous than those without suppressors, and the pellet air rifles with higher velocities were generally more hazardous than those with lower velocities. Conclusion: To minimize auditory risk, youth should utilize air rifles with an integrated suppressor and lower velocity ratings. Air rifle shooters are advised to wear hearing protection whenever engaging in shooting activities in order to gain self-efficacy and model appropriate hearing health behaviors necessary for recreational firearm use.

[1]  G. Price,et al.  Validation of the auditory hazard assessment algorithm for the human with impulse noise data. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  BB and pellet gun-related injuries--United States, June 1992-May 1994. , 1995, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[3]  A R Copeland,et al.  Minimal velocities necessary for perforation of skin by air gun pellets and bullets. , 1982, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  William J Murphy,et al.  Auditory risk estimates for youth target shooting , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[5]  Deanna K Meinke,et al.  Impulse noise generated by starter pistols , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[6]  Mary S Binseel,et al.  Using the Auditory Hazard Assessment Algorithm for Humans (AHAAH) With Hearing Protection Software, Release MIL-STD-1474E , 2013 .

[7]  Per Rasmussen,et al.  Measuring recreational firearm noise. , 2009 .

[8]  P. H. Galloway,et al.  Ocular Air-Gun Injury: 19 Cases , 2001, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[9]  J T Kalb,et al.  Insights into hazard from intense impulses from a mathematical model of the ear. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  B. Berglund,et al.  Guidelines for community noise , 1999 .

[11]  M E Bouton A learning theory perspective on lapse, relapse, and the maintenance of behavior change. , 2000, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[12]  Akihide Imamura,et al.  Course of hearing recovery according to frequency in patients with acute acoustic sensorineural hearing loss. , 2008, The international tinnitus journal.

[13]  Deanna K Meinke,et al.  Auditory risk to unprotected bystanders exposed to firearm noise. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[14]  J. Mercy,et al.  Trends in BB/pellet gun injuries in children and teenagers in the United States, 1985–99 , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[15]  P. Dayan,et al.  Parental Attitudes Toward RB and Pellet Guns , 2000, Clinical pediatrics.

[16]  S. Stark,et al.  Partnership working and the involvement of parents in the health education of 7–11 year-olds , 2005, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[17]  V. Mellert,et al.  Transformation characteristics of the external human ear. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.