Vortex shedding and fluidelastic instability in a normal square tube array excited by two-phase cross-flow

Abstract Laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the flow-induced vibration (FIV) response and fluidelastic stability threshold of a model heat exchanger tube bundle subjected to a cross-flow of refrigerant 11. The tube bundle consisted of a normal square array of 12 tubes with outer tube diameters of 7.11 mm and a pitch over diameter ratio of 1.485. The experiments were conducted in a flow-loop that was capable of generating single- and two-phase cross-flows over a variety of mass fluxes and void fractions. The primary intent of the research was to improve our understanding of the FIVs of heat exchanger tube arrays subjected to two-phase cross-flow. Of particular concern was the effect of array pattern geometry on fluidelastic instability. The experimental results are analysed and compared with existing data from the literature using various methods of parameter definition. Comparison of tube vibration response in liquid flow with previous results shows a similar occurrence of symmetric vortex shedding that validates the scale model approach in single-phase flow. It was found that the introduction of a small amount of bubbles in the flow disrupted the vortex shedding and thereby caused a significant reduction in streamwise vibration amplitude. The fluidelastic stability thresholds for the present array agree well with results from previous studies. Furthermore, a good collapse of the stability data from various investigations is obtained when the fluid density is defined using the slip model of Feenstra et al. and when an effective two-phase flow velocity is defined using the interfacial velocity model of Nakamura et al.

[1]  M. J. Pettigrew,et al.  Two-Phase Flow-Induced Vibration: An Overview (Survey Paper) , 1994 .

[2]  I. G. Currie,et al.  Vibration of a Tube Bundle in Two-Phase Freon Cross-Flow , 1995 .

[3]  D. S. Weaver,et al.  A Flow Visualization Study of a Square Array of Tubes in Water Crossflow , 1985 .

[4]  J. A. Fitzpatrick,et al.  A review of cross-flow induced vibrations in heat exchanger tube arrays , 1988 .

[5]  David S. Weaver,et al.  An improved void fraction model for two-phase cross-flow in horizontal tube bundles , 2000 .

[6]  M. J. Pettigrew,et al.  Vibration of Tube Bundles in Two-Phase Cross-Flow: Part 2—Fluid-Elastic Instability , 1989 .

[7]  David S. Weaver,et al.  Fluidelastic Instability in a Tube Array Subjected to Two-Phase R-11 Cross-Flow , 1995 .

[8]  A. E. Dukler,et al.  Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas‐liquid flow in vertical tubes , 1980 .

[9]  S. S. Chen,et al.  Instability Mechanisms and Stability Criteria of a Group of Circular Cylinders Subjected to Cross-Flow—Part 2: Numerical Results and Discussions , 1981 .

[10]  Hoi Yeung,et al.  Approach flow direction effects on the cross-flow induced vibrations of a square array of tubes , 1983 .

[11]  M. P. Païdoussis,et al.  A review of flow-induced vibrations in reactors and reactor components , 1983 .

[12]  Dieter Mewes,et al.  VERTICAL, UPWARD GAS-LIQUID TWO-PHASE FLOW ACROSS A TUBE BUNDLE , 1994 .

[13]  M. J. Pettigrew,et al.  Vibration of Tube Bundles in Two-Phase Cross-Flow: Part 1—Hydrodynamic Mass and Damping , 1989 .

[14]  B. Villard,et al.  Vibration of Tube Bundles Subjected to Steam-Water Cross Flow: a Comparative Study of Square and Triangular Pitch Arrays , 1985 .

[15]  Franz Mayinger,et al.  Flow Induced Vibration of Tube Bundles Subjected to Single- and Two-Phase Cross-Flow , 1995 .

[16]  S. Banerjee,et al.  Design aspects of gamma densitometers for void fraction measurements in small scale two-phase flows , 1981 .

[17]  Samir Ziada,et al.  Flow-Induced Vibrations in Power and Process Plant Components—Progress and Prospects , 2000 .

[18]  Peter B. Whalley,et al.  Boiling, Condensation, and Gas-Liquid Flow , 1987 .

[19]  Shoei-Sheng Chen,et al.  Guidelines for the instability flow velocity of tube arrays in crossflow , 1984 .