Passive vibration control of the SCOLE beam system

We investigate the optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers (TMDs) to reduce vibrations of flexible structures described by partial differential equations, using the non-uniform SCOLE (NASA Spacecraft Control Laboratory Experiment) beam system with multiple dominant modes as an illustrative application. We use multiple groups of TMDs with each group being placed at the antinode of the mode shape of a dominant mode of the SCOLE beam. We consider both the harmonic and random excitations, for which we employ frequency-limited H ∞ and H 2 optimizations respectively to determine the parameters of the TMDs. Our optimization scheme takes into account the trade-off between effectiveness and robustness of the multiple TMDs to suppress the multiple dominant modes of the SCOLE beam. Simulation studies show that our scheme achieves substantial improvements over the traditional methods in terms of both effectiveness and robustness and that with equal total mass, TMD systems with each group having multiple TMDs are more effective and more robust than the ones with each group having a single TMD.

[1]  Xiaowei Zhao,et al.  Suppression of the vibrations of wind turbine towers , 2011, IMA J. Math. Control. Inf..

[2]  Paul H. Wirsching,et al.  Minimal structural response under random excitation using the vibration absorber , 1973 .

[3]  Bao-Zhu Guo,et al.  On the Boundary Control of a Hybrid System with Variable Coefficients , 2002 .

[4]  Jerome J. Connor,et al.  Introduction to Structural Motion Control , 2002 .

[5]  Xiaowei Zhao,et al.  Load reduction of a monopile wind turbine tower using optimal tuned mass dampers , 2017, Int. J. Control.

[6]  H. Yamaguchi,et al.  Fundamental characteristics of Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers for suppressing harmonically forced oscillations , 1993 .

[7]  M. Luu,et al.  An optimization method of multi-resonant response of high-speed train bridges using TMDs , 2012 .

[8]  L. Markus,et al.  Stabilization of a hybrid system of elasticity by feedback boundary damping , 1988 .

[9]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  FAST User's Guide , 2005 .

[10]  Walter Littman,et al.  Exact boundary controllability of a hybrid system of elasticity , 1988 .

[11]  Charles Poussot-Vassal,et al.  Poles residues descent algorithm for optimal frequency-limited ℋ2 model approximation , 2014, 2014 European Control Conference (ECC).

[12]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  FAST User's Guide - Updated August 2005 , 2005 .

[13]  Lawrence A. Bergman,et al.  Optimal Distribution of Tuned Mass Dampers in Wind-Sensitive Structures , 1989 .

[14]  Erik A. Johnson,et al.  Distributed Mass Damper System for Integrating Structural and Environmental Controls in Buildings , 2011 .

[15]  Lei Zuo,et al.  Effective and Robust Vibration Control Using Series Multiple Tuned-Mass Dampers , 2009 .

[16]  D. A. Howells,et al.  Energy and finite element methods in structural mechanics, By I. H. Shames, C. L. Dym, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York, 1986, No. of pages: 757. Price:$44.95 , 1988 .

[17]  R. Sedaghati,et al.  Passive Vibration Control of Beams Subjected to Random Excitations with Peaked PSD , 2006 .

[18]  Robert J. McNamara,et al.  Tuned Mass Dampers for Buildings , 1977 .

[19]  Kyoung Sun Moon,et al.  Vertically distributed multiple tuned mass dampers in tall buildings: performance analysis and preliminary design , 2009 .

[20]  K. Xu,et al.  Dynamic characteristics of multiple substructures with closely spaced frequencies , 1992 .

[21]  J. Jonkman,et al.  Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development , 2009 .

[22]  Ajoy Ghatak,et al.  The Dirac Delta Function , 2004 .

[23]  R. Lewandowski,et al.  Dynamic analysis of structures with multiple tuned mass dampers , 2009 .

[24]  Y. Fujino,et al.  Dynamic characterization of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas , 1994 .

[25]  A. Belegundu,et al.  Introduction to Finite Elements in Engineering , 1990 .

[26]  Rosario Toscano Signal and System Norms , 2013 .

[27]  Lei Zuo,et al.  Design of Passive Mechanical Systems via Decentralized Control Techniques , 2002 .

[28]  Giovanni Falsone,et al.  An Euler–Bernoulli-like finite element method for Timoshenko beams , 2011 .

[29]  Takeru Igusa,et al.  Vibration Control Using Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers , 1994 .

[30]  Masato Abe,et al.  Tuned mass dampers for structures with closely spaced natural frequencies , 1995 .

[31]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  Performance of Multiple Mass Dampers Under Random Loading , 1995 .

[32]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  A METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC APPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[33]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters , 1982 .

[34]  Chi-Chang Lin,et al.  Train-Induced Vibration Control of High-Speed Railway Bridges Equipped with Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers , 2005 .

[35]  Haijun Zhang,et al.  Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non‐stationary base excitation during earthquake , 2008 .