An application of Brain Computer Interface in chronic stroke to improve arm reaching function exploiting operant learning strategy and brain plasticity

The paper deals with a specific kind of BCI application implemented with the aim of recovering the reaching ability of mild impaired stroke survivors. The overall idea is to take advantage of the plasticity of the brain to make the subject artificially learn alternative neural paths to control the arm movement again, by-passing the injured area thanks to a BCI system with an EEG-related force provided as a real-time feedback during the training period. Preliminary results have shown improvements in the kinematics of the upper limb motion of a first patient that performed this experimental rehabilitative program. Then, this BCI application is expected to enter soon the daily clinical practise as a useful tool besides the standard rehabilitation therapy.

[1]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  E. Fetz.  Operant Conditioning of Cortical Unit Activity , 1969, Science.

[3]  E. Curran,et al.  Learning to control brain activity: A review of the production and control of EEG components for driving brain–computer interface (BCI) systems , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[4]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG event-related desynchronization (ERD) and synchronization (ERS) , 1997 .

[5]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[6]  Andrew G. Glen,et al.  APPL , 2001 .

[7]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-computer interface: a new communication device for handicapped persons , 1993 .

[9]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain-Computer Interface in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013, J. Comput. Sci. Eng..

[10]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  P. Tonin,et al.  Motor Learning Principles for Rehabilitation: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study in Poststroke Patients , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke , 2011, Nature Reviews Neurology.