One more cup of coffee for the road: object–action assemblies, response blocking and response capture after frontal lobe damage

Abstract. We report data from a patient, FK, who manifested 'utilisation' behaviour after bilateral lesions of the medial frontal and anterior temporal lobes. In tasks requiring actions to be made with the hand compatible with the orientation of a cup, FK was able to ignore irrelevant distractors that fell in the path of action to the target. However, errors were made when the distractors were other cups. These errors reflected the hand selected on the basis of the properties of the target, suggesting that distractors competed to control the action after selection of the target. When similar in kind to the target, distractors sometimes captured the action. However, distractors that were associated with an action related to the target blocked the usual hand response. These results suggest a complex interlocking of attention and action when grasping responses are made to a target amongst distractors. There is initial selection of the target, but distractors on the path of a reach can then compete for control of the action. Distractors can be inhibited if they do not match the properties of the specified target, and there can also be inhibition of concurrently activated responses. We show that the magnitude of the inhibition is proportional to the strength of learned object–action associations.

[1]  S. Tipper,et al.  Inhibition and Interference in Selective Attention: Some Tests of a Neural Network Model , 1996 .

[2]  Michael C. Mozer,et al.  Perception of multiple objects - a connectionist approach , 1991, Neural network modeling and connectionism.

[3]  J. Riddoch,et al.  Visual affordances and object selection , 2001 .

[4]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  AGNOSIA WITHOUT PROSOPAGNOSIA OR ALEXIA: EVIDENCE FOR STORED VISUAL MEMORIES SPECIFIC TO OBJECTS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[5]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective Reaching to Grasp: Evidence for Distractor Interference Effects , 1997 .

[6]  U. Castiello Grasping a fruit: selection for action. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  J. Fuster Memory in the cerebral cortex , 1994 .

[9]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selective reaching: evidence for action-centered attention. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Glyn W. Humphreys Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Spatial Representation and Selection in the Brain: Neuropsychological and Computational Constraints , 1998 .

[11]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  S Ullman,et al.  Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[13]  S. Tipper,et al.  Behavioral consequences of selection from neural population codes. , 2000 .

[14]  M. J. Riddoch,et al.  Visual object processing in optic aphasia: a case of semantic access agnosia , 1987 .

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attention, Space, and Action: Studies in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2001 .

[16]  S. Tipper,et al.  A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. , 1994 .

[17]  G. Humphreys,et al.  NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL EVIDENCE DISTINGUISHING OBJECT SELECTION FROM ACTION (EFFECTOR) SELECTION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[18]  J. Riddoch,et al.  Birmingham object recognition battery , 1993 .

[19]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[20]  H. Deubel,et al.  Selective Dorsal and Ventral Processing: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism in Reaching and Perception , 1998 .

[21]  J. Tresilian Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  I. THE ATTENTION SYSTEM OF THE HUMAN BRAIN , 2002 .

[23]  R. Passingham The frontal lobes and voluntary action , 1993 .

[24]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Disordered action schema and action disorganisation syndrome , 1998 .

[25]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[26]  F. Lhermitte 'Utilization behaviour' and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Goldman-Rakic Ps Cellular and circuit basis of working memory in prefrontal cortex of nonhuman primates. , 1990 .