Induction of CD4 T cell memory by local cellular collectivity

Modeling memory differentiation in T cells The balance between effector and central memory T cells shifts toward the latter as the number of T cells participating in immune responses increases. Polonsky et al. determined the mechanisms by which T cell quorum sensing affects memory differentiation by using live-cell imaging to track cell proliferation and differentiation. They found that the rate of memory CD4+ T cell differentiation is determined by cell number. This rate substantially increases above a threshold number of locally interacting cells. Mathematical modeling suggests that the number of initially seeded cells and the number of cell divisions are not critical. Instead, the instantaneous number of interacting cells continuously modulates the differentiation rate. This is partly fueled by increased sensitivity to the cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-6, independent of any effects on cell proliferation. Science, this issue p. eaaj1853 Collective sensing by CD4+ T cells promotes differentiation of immunological memory T cells. INTRODUCTION Fate decisions play a central role in the operation of the vertebrate immune system. The establishment of efficient acquired immune responses depends on the differentiation of naïve T cells into various effector and memory cell types upon recognition of a cognate antigen, and on the appropriate balance between these populations. A number of studies have shown that the balance between effector and central memory T cells is shifted in favor of the latter when more T cells participate in the response. This observation has the hallmarks of quorum sensing, the ability of cells to respond to their population density. However, the mechanisms driving this behavior in T cells remain elusive. RATIONALE We observed increased differentiation of progenitor central memory T cells (pTCMs) at high cell densities both in vivo and in vitro. However, activated T cells rapidly form dense dynamic clusters, precluding the distinction between the effects of local interactions within cell clusters from global, long-range interactions through soluble factors. To overcome these difficulties, we used live-cell imaging to track the proliferation and differentiation of cells cultured in microwell arrays. This microculture system provides precise control and monitoring of the number of interacting T cells and their state after T cell activation. Continuously tracking differentiation and proliferation enabled us to investigate the mechanisms of cellular collectivity and its influence on memory differentiation. RESULTS We first validated that the pTCM cells formed early in our cultures show the markings of established central memory T cells using RNA sequencing and in vivo experiments. Then, with our microwell system, we showed that the rate of differentiation of pTCM cells is determined by the number of cells within individual microwells and sharply increases above a threshold number of locally interacting cells. Further analysis showed that cells follow a universal differentiation trajectory, whereby their differentiation rate is continuously modulated by the instantaneous number of interacting cells, rather than simply by the number of cells present initially within each microwell, or by the number of cell divisions. A combination of experimental manipulation and computational simulations showed that the observed collectivity involved increased sensitivity of clustered T cells to the cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-6, orthogonal to their effect on cell proliferation. CONCLUSION By systematically analyzing the role of intercellular interactions in a synthetic microenvironment, we showed that local T cell density could modulate the balance between central memory and effector cells independent of further potential influence by antigen-presenting cells or T cell receptor signaling strength. This cellular collectivity is a continuous process and is not determined by the number of cell divisions, but rather by the number of locally interacting cells at any given time. Local collectivity can influence the diversity and magnitude of immune memory, by modulating interactions between T cell clones during their priming in response to antigens. Understanding the rules of T cell social behavior will be important to learn how to manipulate the immune system for therapeutic or prophylactic goals. Collective local interactions enhance CD4+ memory T cell differentiation. The effects of intercellular interactions on T cell memory formation were studied in microwell arrays, each well holding a different number of locally interacting cells. Proliferation and differentiation were evaluated by using time-lapse movies. Differentiation into memory precursors sharply increased above a threshold number of interacting cells. This was modulated by increased sensitivity of the interacting cells to the cytokines IL-2 and IL-6. FIGURE COURTESY OF TAL BIGDARI/DIVISION OF RESEARCH SERVICES, WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE Cell differentiation is directed by signals driving progenitors into specialized cell types. This process can involve collective decision-making, when differentiating cells determine their lineage choice by interacting with each other. We used live-cell imaging in microwell arrays to study collective processes affecting differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into memory precursors. We found that differentiation of precursor memory T cells sharply increases above a threshold number of locally interacting cells. These homotypic interactions involve the cytokines interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-6, which affect memory differentiation orthogonal to their effect on proliferation and survival. Mathematical modeling suggests that the differentiation rate is continuously modulated by the instantaneous number of locally interacting cells. This cellular collectivity can prioritize allocation of immune memory to stronger responses.

[1]  N. Friedman,et al.  Substrate-bound CCL21 and ICAM1 combined with soluble IL-6 collectively augment the expansion of antigen-specific murine CD4+ T cells. , 2017, Blood advances.

[2]  John T. Chang,et al.  Early transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of CD8+ T cell differentiation revealed by single-cell RNA-seq , 2017, Nature Immunology.

[3]  John T. Chang,et al.  Early transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of CD 8 + T cell differentiation revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing , 2017 .

[4]  G. Tsokos,et al.  Engagement of SLAMF3 enhances CD4+ T-cell sensitivity to IL-2 and favors regulatory T-cell polarization in systemic lupus erythematosus , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Clonal expansion under the microscope: studying lymphocyte activation and differentiation using live‐cell imaging , 2016, Immunology and cell biology.

[6]  Ronald N. Germain,et al.  Immune homeostasis enforced by co-localized effector and regulatory T cells , 2015, Nature.

[7]  Thomas Höfer,et al.  Three-Dimensional Gradients of Cytokine Signaling between T Cells , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  R. Ahmed,et al.  Memory CD8 T cell transcriptional plasticity , 2015, F1000prime reports.

[9]  William Ritchie,et al.  Real-time tracking of cell cycle progression during CD8+ effector and memory T-cell differentiation , 2015, Nature Communications.

[10]  Philip D. Hodgkin,et al.  Antigen affinity, costimulation, and cytokine inputs sum linearly to amplify T cell expansion , 2014, Science.

[11]  W. Huber,et al.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 , 2014, Genome Biology.

[12]  Wenlian Zhang,et al.  Effector CD4 T cell transition to memory requires late cognate interactions that induce autocrine IL-2 , 2014, Nature Communications.

[13]  P. Hodgkin,et al.  Lymphocyte fate specification as a deterministic but highly plastic process , 2014, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[14]  P. Hodgkin,et al.  Why the immune system takes its chances with randomness , 2014, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[15]  Yan Gao,et al.  T cell-intrinsic role of IL-6 signaling in primary and memory responses , 2014, eLife.

[16]  John T. Chang,et al.  Early specification of CD8+ T lymphocyte fates during adaptive immunity revealed by single-cell gene expression analyses , 2014, Nature Immunology.

[17]  I. Amit,et al.  Massively Parallel Single-Cell RNA-Seq for Marker-Free Decomposition of Tissues into Cell Types , 2014, Science.

[18]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Coupled IL-2–Dependent Extracellular Feedbacks Govern Two Distinct Consecutive Phases of CD4 T Cell Activation , 2013, The Journal of Immunology.

[19]  Courtney R. Plumlee,et al.  Environmental cues dictate the fate of individual CD8+ T cells responding to infection. , 2013, Immunity.

[20]  Thomas Höfer,et al.  Disparate Individual Fates Compose Robust CD8+ T Cell Immunity , 2013, Science.

[21]  T. Speed,et al.  Id2-Mediated Inhibition of E2A Represses Memory CD8+ T Cell Differentiation , 2013, The Journal of Immunology.

[22]  E. Yang,et al.  Transcriptional insights into the CD8+ T cell response to infection and memory T cell formation , 2013, Nature Immunology.

[23]  Omar Khan,et al.  Secondary T cell–T cell synaptic interactions drive the differentiation of protective CD8+ T cells , 2013, Nature Immunology.

[24]  Susan M. Kaech,et al.  Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[25]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Monitoring the dynamics of primary T cell activation and differentiation using long term live cell imaging in microwell arrays. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[26]  Y. Lou,et al.  FOXO1 Up-Regulates Human L-selectin Expression Through Binding to a Consensus FOXO1 Motif , 2012, Gene regulation and systems biology.

[27]  J. Cannons,et al.  Positive and negative signaling through SLAM receptors regulate synapse organization and thresholds of cytolysis. , 2012, Immunity.

[28]  Michael W. Sneddon,et al.  Single-cell quantification of IL-2 response by effector and regulatory T cells reveals critical plasticity in immune response , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[29]  E. Wherry,et al.  Cutting Edge: The Transcription Factor Eomesodermin Enables CD8+ T Cells To Compete for the Memory Cell Niche , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  Diana M. Mitchell,et al.  Distinct Roles for IL-2 and IL-15 in the Differentiation and Survival of CD8+ Effector and Memory T Cells , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[31]  C. Glass,et al.  Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[32]  M. Savio,et al.  Multiple roles of the cell cycle inhibitor p21(CDKN1A) in the DNA damage response. , 2010, Mutation research.

[33]  L. Lefrançois,et al.  Memory CD8+ T cell differentiation , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Michael J. Bevan,et al.  The precursors of memory: models and controversies , 2009, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[35]  Lior Pachter,et al.  Sequence Analysis , 2020, Definitions.

[36]  B. Hoffman,et al.  Apoptotic signaling by c-MYC , 2008, Oncogene.

[37]  Junsang Doh,et al.  A synaptic basis for paracrine interleukin-2 signaling during homotypic T cell interaction. , 2008, Immunity.

[38]  L. Lefrançois,et al.  Endogenous naive CD8+ T cell precursor frequency regulates primary and memory responses to infection. , 2008, Immunity.

[39]  J. Harty,et al.  Initial T cell receptor transgenic cell precursor frequency dictates critical aspects of the CD8(+) T cell response to infection. , 2007, Immunity.

[40]  M. Hatano,et al.  Bcl6 is essential for the generation of long-term memory CD4+ T cells. , 2007, International immunology.

[41]  John T. Chang,et al.  Asymmetric T Lymphocyte Division in the Initiation of Adaptive Immune Responses , 2007, Science.

[42]  P. Hodgkin,et al.  A model of immune regulation as a consequence of randomized lymphocyte division and death times , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  K. Wolslegel,et al.  Interleukin-2 enhances CD4+ T cell memory by promoting the generation of IL-7Rα–expressing cells , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[44]  A. Goldrath,et al.  Transcriptional regulator Id2 mediates CD8+ T cell immunity , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[45]  Corey M. Carlson,et al.  Kruppel-like factor 2 regulates thymocyte and T-cell migration , 2006, Nature.

[46]  Leo Lefrançois,et al.  Initial T cell frequency dictates memory CD8+ T cell lineage commitment , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[47]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  Understanding the generation and function of memory T cell subsets. , 2005, Current opinion in immunology.

[48]  M. Bevan,et al.  Shortening the Infectious Period Does Not Alter Expansion of CD8 T Cells but Diminishes Their Capacity to Differentiate into Memory Cells1 , 2004, The Journal of Immunology.

[49]  S. Swain,et al.  IL-7 Promotes the Transition of CD4 Effectors to Persistent Memory Cells , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[50]  L. Bradley,et al.  Interleukin 7 Regulates the Survival and Generation of Memory CD4 Cells , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[51]  E. Wherry,et al.  Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[52]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  T cell fitness determined by signal strength , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[53]  F. Sallusto,et al.  Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions , 1999, Nature.