Structuration theory: its potential impact on logistics research

While the physical paths that goods traverse are being simplified, the capture, storage, processing and dissemination of information associated with logistics has become considerably more complex. Logistics researchers need to better understand the behavioral and managerial issues created by information technology implementation. The paper suggests that structuration theory, a research approach derived from sociology that has become well established in the study of information systems, can contribute to that understanding. This paper introduces logistics researchers to structuration theory as a useful theoretical framework that can help understand the relationship between technologies, the people who interpret them, and the patterns of use that stem from that interpretation.

[1]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.

[2]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[3]  James R. Stock,et al.  Logistics Thought and Practice: A Perspective , 1990 .

[4]  Dag Näslund.  Logistics needs qualitative research – especially action research , 2002 .

[5]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Integrated logistics--call in the revolutionaries! , 1997 .

[6]  M. Markus,et al.  Information technology and organizational change: causal structure in theory and research , 1988 .

[7]  K. Weick.  Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies , 1990 .

[8]  M. A. Mcginnis,et al.  TRENDS IN LOGISTICS THOUGHT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY / , 1994 .

[9]  J. Alexander,et al.  Images of Organization , 1988 .

[10]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence , 2001 .

[11]  D. Lambert,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities , 1998 .

[12]  Matthew A. Waller,et al.  A NOTE ON RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN BUSINESS LOGISTICS. , 1993 .

[13]  M. Cooper.  MESHING MULTIPLE ALLIANCES , 1997 .

[14]  A. Blasi,et al.  Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society by Victor Turner. Ithaca: Cornell University Press and Peyote Hunt: The Sacred Journey of the Huichol Indians by Barbara G. Myerhoff. Ithaca: Cornell University Press , 1974 .

[15]  Terri L. Griffith.  Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[16]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[17]  Timothy James Edwards,et al.  Innovation and Organizational Change: Developments Towards an Interactive Process Perspective , 2000 .

[18]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Scholarship and practice: the contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap , 1994, Business Process Re-Engineering.

[19]  C. Steinfield,et al.  Cybermediaries in Electronic Marketspace: Toward Theory Building , 1998 .

[20]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[21]  J. Stock.  Applying theories from other disciplines to logistics , 1997 .

[22]  Daniel J. Flint,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON THE EVOLUTION OF LOGISTICS THOUGHT. , 1997 .

[23]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[24]  C. Argyris.  On organizational learning , 1993 .

[25]  C. Geertz.  The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays , 1975 .

[26]  Frank J. Barrett,et al.  The Transforming Nature of Metaphors in Group Development: A Study in Group Theory , 1988 .

[27]  G. N. Evans,et al.  Dynamic Supply Chain Performance: Assessing the Impact of Information Systems , 1993 .

[28]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..