The affordances of using a flipped classroom approach in the teaching of mathematics: a case study of a grade 10 mathematics class

Teaching secondary mathematics has a number of challenges, including the expectations that teachers cover the prescribed curriculum, help students learn difficult concepts, prepare students for future studies, and, increasingly, that they do so incorporating digital technologies. This study investigates a teacher’s, and his students’, perceptions of the benefits or otherwise of a flipped classroom approach in meeting these challenges, within a prescribed curriculum context. Data collection instruments included a survey designed to investigate the nature of students’ engagement with the flipped approach and semi-structured student and teacher interviews. Analysis of these data indicated that the teacher and students were positive about their experiences with a flipped classroom approach and that students were motivated to engage with the teacher-created online mathematics resources. The study adds to the limited research literature related to student and teacher perceptions of the affordances of the flipped classroom approach and has implications for secondary mathematics teachers who face the challenge of the twin demands of covering the prescribed curriculum and catering for a range of students’ learning needs.

[1]  E. Mandinach,et al.  The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation , 1983 .

[2]  Aaron Sams,et al.  Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day , 2012 .

[3]  T. Muir.  Google, Mathletics and Khan Academy: students’ self-initiated use of online mathematical resources , 2014 .

[4]  M. Goos,et al.  The Role of Digital Technologies in Numeracy Teaching and Learning , 2015 .

[5]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .

[6]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[7]  Paul Drijvers,et al.  The role of handheld technology in the mathematics classroom , 2010 .

[8]  C. Laborde,et al.  Teaching and Learning Geometry with Technology , 2006 .

[9]  Richard Lesh,et al.  Trends in the evolution of models & modeling perspectives on mathematical learning and problem solving , 2005 .

[10]  Zina O'Leary.  The essential guide to doing your research project , 2014 .

[11]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[12]  Vince Geiger,et al.  Factors Affecting Teachers’ Adoption of Innovative Practices with Technology and Mathematical Modelling , 2011 .

[13]  Merrilyn Goos,et al.  Cas-enabled technologies as ‘agents provocateurs’ in teaching and learning mathematical modelling in secondary school classrooms , 2010 .

[14]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[15]  Prachi Srivastava,et al.  A Practical Iterative Framework for Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009 .

[16]  L. Abeysekera,et al.  Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research , 2015 .

[17]  T. Muir.  Student and Parent Perspectives on Flipping the Mathematics Classroom , 2015 .

[18]  V. Geiger,et al.  Technology in Mathematics Education , 2012 .

[19]  M. Goos,et al.  Reshaping teacher and student roles in technology-enriched classrooms , 2000 .

[20]  K. Fulton.  Upside down and inside out: Flip Your Classroom to Improve Student Learning. , 2012 .

[21]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  What can digital technologies take from and bring to research in mathematics education , 2003 .

[22]  Robyn Jorgensen,et al.  ‘I Hate Maths: Why Do We Need to Do Maths?’ Using iPad Video Diaries to Investigate Attitudes and Emotions Towards Mathematics in Year 3 and Year 6 Students , 2016 .

[23]  Celia Hoyles,et al.  Mathematics Education and Technology-Rethinking the Terrain , 2010 .

[24]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[25]  Jianzhong Xu,et al.  Self-Regulation of Homework Behavior: Homework Management at the Secondary School Level , 2013 .

[26]  Nancy A. Schiller,et al.  Case Studies and the Flipped Classroom , 2013 .

[27]  H. Chick,et al.  Flipping the Classroom: A Case Study of a Mathematics Methods Class. , 2014 .

[28]  Merrilyn Goos,et al.  Connecting social perspectives on mathematics teacher education in online environments , 2012 .

[29]  Robert B. Burns,et al.  Introduction to Research Methods , 2015, Research Methods for Political Science.

[30]  M. Civil.  WORKING TOWARDS EQUITY IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION: A FOCUS ON LEARNERS, TEACHERS, AND PARENTS , 2006 .

[31]  Ornella Robutti,et al.  The Role and Uses of Technologies for the Teaching of Algebra and Calculus: Ideas Discussed at Pme over the Last 30 Years , 2006 .

[32]  Vince Geiger,et al.  A social perspective on technology-enhanced mathematical learning: from collaboration to performance , 2010 .

[33]  Jeremy F. Strayer.  How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation , 2012 .

[34]  Catherine Attard,et al.  Exploring the Use of iPads to Engage Young Students with Mathematics. , 2012 .

[35]  Michael S. Cole,et al.  Student Learning Motivation and Psychological Hardiness: Interactive Effects on Students' Reactions to a Management Class , 2004 .