Multimodal feature analysis for quantitative performance evaluation of endotracheal intubation (ETI)

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a crucial medical procedure performed on critically ill patients. It involves insertion of a breathing tube into the trachea i.e. the windpipe connecting the larynx and the lungs. Often, this procedure is performed by the paramedics (aka providers) under challenging prehospital settings e.g. roadside, ambulances or helicopters. Successful intubations could be lifesaving, whereas, failed intubation could potentially be fatal. Under prehospital environments, ETI success rates among the paramedics are surprisingly low and this necessitates better training and performance evaluation of ETI skills. Currently, few objective metrics exist to quantify the differences in ETI techniques between providers. In this pilot study, we develop a quantitative framework for discriminating the kinematic characteristics of providers with different experience levels. The system utilizes statistical analysis on spatio-temporal multimodal features extracted from optical motion capture, accelerometers and electromyography (EMG) sensors. Our experiments involved three individuals performing intubations on a dummy, each with different levels of training. Quantitative performance analysis on multimodal features revealed distinctive differences among different skill levels. In future work, the feedback from these analysis could potentially be harnessed for enhanced ETI training.

[1]  P. Pepe,et al.  Prehospital endotracheal intubation: rationale for training emergency medical personnel. , 1985, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  R. O’Connor,et al.  The Effect of a Quality Improvement Feedback Loop on Paramedic Skills, Charting, and Behavior , 1994, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[3]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[4]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[5]  Antony J Hodgson,et al.  Quantitative methodology of evaluating surgeon performance in laparoscopic surgery. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[6]  J. S. Bushra,et al.  A comparison of trauma intubations managed by anesthesiologists and emergency physicians. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[7]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[8]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Statistical shape analysis: clustering, learning, and testing , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  G. Saleh,et al.  Kinematic analysis of surgical dexterity in intraocular surgery. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  Namrata Vaswani,et al.  Nonstationary Shape Activities: Dynamic Models for Landmark Shape Change and Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  M. Hubble,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Prehospital Airway Control Techniques Part I: Orotracheal and Nasotracheal Intubation Success Rates , 2010, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.

[12]  T. Rahman,et al.  Tracking Manikin Tracheal Intubation Using Motion Analysis , 2011, Pediatric emergency care.

[13]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Out-of-hospital airway management in the United States. , 2011, Resuscitation.

[14]  C. Callaway,et al.  Variables Associated with Successful Intubation Attempts Using Video Laryngoscopy: A Preliminary Report in a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service , 2012, Prehospital emergency care : official journal of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the National Association of State EMS Directors.