The Development of an Automated Device for Asthma Monitoring for Adolescents: Methodologic Approach and User Acceptability

Background Many adolescents suffer serious asthma related morbidity that can be prevented by adequate self-management of the disease. The accurate symptom monitoring by patients is the most fundamental antecedent to effective asthma management. Nonetheless, the adequacy and effectiveness of current methods of symptom self-monitoring have been challenged due to the individuals’ fallible symptom perception, poor adherence, and inadequate technique. Recognition of these limitations led to the development of an innovative device that can facilitate continuous and accurate monitoring of asthma symptoms with minimal disruption of daily routines, thus increasing acceptability to adolescents. Objective The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe the development of a novel symptom monitoring device for teenagers (teens), and (2) assess their perspectives on the usability and acceptability of the device. Methods Adolescents (13-17 years old) with and without asthma participated in the evolution of an automated device for asthma monitoring (ADAM), which comprised three phases, including development (Phase 1, n=37), validation/user acceptability (Phase 2, n=84), and post hoc validation (Phase 3, n=10). In Phase 1, symptom algorithms were identified based on the acoustic analysis of raw symptom sounds and programmed into a popular mobile system, the iPod. Phase 2 involved a 7 day trial of ADAM in vivo, and the evaluation of user acceptance using an acceptance survey and individual interviews. ADAM was further modified and enhanced in Phase 3. Results Through ADAM, incoming audio data were digitized and processed in two steps involving the extraction of a sequence of descriptive feature vectors, and the processing of these sequences by a hidden Markov model-based Viterbi decoder to differentiate symptom sounds from background noise. The number and times of detected symptoms were stored and displayed in the device. The sensitivity (true positive) of the updated cough algorithm was 70% (21/30), and, on average, 2 coughs per hour were identified as false positive. ADAM also kept track of the their activity level throughout the day using the mobile system’s built in accelerometer function. Overall, the device was well received by participants who perceived it as attractive, convenient, and helpful. The participants recognized the potential benefits of the device in asthma care, and were eager to use it for their asthma management. Conclusions ADAM can potentially automate daily symptom monitoring with minimal intrusiveness and maximal objectivity. The users’ acceptance of the device based on its recognized convenience, user-friendliness, and usefulness in increasing symptom awareness underscores ADAM’s potential to overcome the issues of symptom monitoring including poor adherence, inadequate technique, and poor symptom perception in adolescents. Further refinement of the algorithm is warranted to improve the accuracy of the device. Future study is also needed to assess the efficacy of the device in promoting self-management and asthma outcomes.

[1]  R. Baughman,et al.  Quantitation of wheezing in acute asthma. , 1984, Chest.

[2]  Steve Young,et al.  Token passing: a simple conceptual model for connected speech recognition systems , 1989 .

[3]  R. Beck,et al.  Histamine challenge in young children using computerized lung sounds analysis. , 1992, Chest.

[4]  P Piirilä,et al.  Changes in frequency spectra of breath sounds during histamine challenge test in adult asthmatics and healthy control subjects. , 1994, Chest.

[5]  Third Expert Panel on theDiagnosis,et al.  Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma , 1997 .

[6]  S. Rietveld,et al.  The influence of respiratory sounds on breathlessness in children with asthma: a symptom-perception approach. , 1997, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[7]  S. Rietveld,et al.  Diagnostics of spontaneous cough in childhood asthma: results of continuous tracheal sound recording in the homes of children. , 1998, Chest.

[8]  D. Carlisle,et al.  Adverse asthma outcomes among children hospitalized with asthma in California. , 1998, Pediatrics.

[9]  E. H. Dooijes,et al.  Classification of Asthmatic Breath Sounds: Preliminary Results of the Classifying Capacity of Human Examiners versus Artificial Neural Networks , 1999, Comput. Biomed. Res..

[10]  Characteristics and diagnostic significance of spontaneous wheezing in children with asthma: results of continuous in vivo sound recording. , 1999, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[11]  M. Sandelowski Focus on Research Methods Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? , 2022 .

[12]  G. Strube Asthma education , 2000, Thorax.

[13]  R. Ruffin,et al.  A randomized trial of peak‐flow and symptom‐based action plans in adults with moderate‐to‐severe asthma , 2001, Respirology.

[14]  H. Kyngas,et al.  Support as a crucial predictor of good compliance of adolescents with a chronic disease. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.

[15]  M. Kearney Levels and applications of qualitative research evidence. , 2001, Research in nursing & health.

[16]  A. La Greca,et al.  Peer Relations of Youth with Pediatric Conditions and Health Risks: Promoting Social Support and Healthy Lifestyles , 2002, Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP.

[17]  C. Henderson,et al.  Symptom monitoring in childhood asthma: a randomized clinical trial comparing peak expiratory flow rate with symptom monitoring. , 2002, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[18]  The burden of paediatric asthma is higher than health professionals think: results from the Asthma in Real Life (AIR) study. , 2002, Primary care respiratory journal : journal of the General Practice Airways Group.

[19]  L. Akinbami,et al.  Trends in childhood asthma: prevalence, health care utilization, and mortality. , 2002, Pediatrics.

[20]  M. Reznik,et al.  Perceptions and Attitudes of Adolescents with Asthma , 2003, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[21]  H. Ulmer,et al.  Lung function and symptom perception in children with asthma and their parents , 2003, Pediatric pulmonology.

[22]  N. Clark,et al.  Educational interventions for asthma in children. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  D. Blackwell,et al.  Summary health statistics for U.S. children: National Health Interview Survey, 2000. , 2003, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[24]  N. Clark,et al.  Effects of educational interventions for self management of asthma in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Daniel H Solomon,et al.  Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[26]  Jeannine S. Schiller,et al.  Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2002. , 2004, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[27]  M. Silverman,et al.  Peak flow monitoring for guided self-management in childhood asthma: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[28]  Yunling E. Du,et al.  Asthma education: the adolescent experience. , 2004, Patient education and counseling.

[29]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[30]  R. Jané,et al.  Analysis of Forced Wheezes in Asthma Patients , 2006, Respiration.

[31]  S. Bhogal,et al.  Written action plans for asthma in children. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[32]  J. Halterman,et al.  Symptom reporting in childhood asthma: a comparison of assessment methods , 2006, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[33]  G. Ayala,et al.  Asthma in middle schools: what students have to say about their asthma. , 2006, The Journal of school health.

[34]  David H. Evans,et al.  An Automated System for 24-h Monitoring of Cough Frequency: The Leicester Cough Monitor , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  H. Rhee,et al.  Adolescents' psychosocial experiences living with asthma: a focus group study. , 2007, Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners.

[36]  E. Sondik,et al.  Status of Childhood Asthma in the United States, 1980–2007 , 2009, Pediatrics.

[37]  K. Murphy,et al.  Management of asthma: New approaches to establishing control , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

[38]  H. Rhee,et al.  Barriers to asthma self‐management in adolescents: Relationships to psychosocial factors , 2009, Pediatric pulmonology.

[39]  B. Bloom,et al.  Summary health statistics for U.S. children: National Health Interview Survey, 2010. , 2011, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[40]  L. Akinbami,et al.  Asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality: United States, 2005-2009. , 2011, National health statistics reports.

[41]  D. Peden,et al.  Is Johnny wheezing? Parent–child agreement in the Childhood Asthma in America survey , 2011, Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology.

[42]  J. Wildhaber,et al.  Global impact of asthma on children and adolescents' daily lives: The room to breathe survey , 2012, Pediatric pulmonology.

[43]  Kevin B. Johnson,et al.  Assessing Adolescent Asthma Symptoms and Adherence Using Mobile Phones , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.