Connectivity measures are robust biomarkers of cortical function and plasticity after stroke.

Valid biomarkers of motor system function after stroke could improve clinical decision-making. Electroencephalography-based measures are safe, inexpensive, and accessible in complex medical settings and so are attractive candidates. This study examined specific electroencephalography cortical connectivity measures as biomarkers by assessing their relationship with motor deficits across 28 days of intensive therapy. Resting-state connectivity measures were acquired four times using dense array (256 leads) electroencephalography in 12 hemiparetic patients (7.3 ± 4.0 months post-stroke, age 26-75 years, six male/six female) across 28 days of intensive therapy targeting arm motor deficits. Structural magnetic resonance imaging measured corticospinal tract injury and infarct volume. At baseline, connectivity with leads overlying ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) was a robust and specific marker of motor status, accounting for 78% of variance in impairment; ipsilesional M1 connectivity with leads overlying ipsilesional frontal-premotor (PM) regions accounted for most of this (R(2) = 0.51) and remained significant after controlling for injury. Baseline impairment also correlated with corticospinal tract injury (R(2) = 0.52), though not infarct volume. A model that combined a functional measure of connectivity with a structural measure of injury (corticospinal tract injury) performed better than either measure alone (R(2) = 0.93). Across the 28 days of therapy, change in connectivity with ipsilesional M1 was a good biomarker of motor gains (R(2) = 0.61). Ipsilesional M1-PM connectivity increased in parallel with motor gains, with greater gains associated with larger increases in ipsilesional M1-PM connectivity (R(2) = 0.34); greater gains were also associated with larger decreases in M1-parietal connectivity (R(2) = 0.36). In sum, electroencephalography measures of motor cortical connectivity-particularly between ipsilesional M1 and ipsilesional premotor-are strongly related to motor deficits and their improvement with therapy after stroke and so may be useful biomarkers of cortical function and plasticity. Such measures might provide a biological approach to distinguishing patient subgroups after stroke.

[1]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Partial Least Squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: A tutorial and review , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  W. Byblow,et al.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  P. Matthews,et al.  The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  The behavioral significance of coherent resting-state oscillations after stroke , 2012, NeuroImage.

[5]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Changes in Resting State Effective Connectivity in the Motor Network Following Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity Poststroke Paresis , 2009, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[6]  P. Matthews,et al.  Functional MRI Detects Posterior Shifts in Primary Sensorimotor Cortex Activation After Stroke: Evidence of Local Adaptive Reorganization? , 2001, Stroke.

[7]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronic stroke. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[9]  P. Matthews,et al.  Walking performance and its recovery in chronic stroke in relation to extent of lesion overlap with the descending motor tract , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  H. Freund,et al.  Role of the premotor cortex in recovery from middle cerebral artery infarction. , 1998, Archives of neurology.

[12]  François Chollet,et al.  Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  M. Hallett,et al.  Involvement of the ipsilateral motor cortex in finger movements of different complexities , 1997, Annals of neurology.

[14]  Chi-Hua Chen,et al.  Neurocognitive endophenotypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  Babak Shahbaba,et al.  Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[16]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Ramesh Srinivasan,et al.  Neural Strategies for Selective Attention Distinguish Fast-Action Video Game Players , 2012, Brain Topography.

[18]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  S. Cramer Stratifying patients with stroke in trials that target brain repair. , 2010, Stroke.

[20]  S. Hallerb,et al.  Real-time fMRI neurofeedback : progress and challenges , 2017 .

[21]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Baron,et al.  Motor imagery after stroke: Relating outcome to motor network connectivity , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[23]  Xin Huang,et al.  Optimal Combinations of Diagnostic Tests Based on AUC , 2011, Biometrics.

[24]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Predictors and Biomarkers of Treatment Gains in a Clinical Stroke Trial Targeting the Lower Extremity , 2014, Stroke.

[25]  Rick M Dijkhuizen,et al.  Increase in Sensorimotor Cortex Response to Somatosensory Stimulation Over Subacute Poststroke Period Correlates With Motor Recovery in Hemiparetic Patients , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  Modulation of functional connectivity during the resting state and the motor task , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[27]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Longitudinal Changes of Resting-State Functional Connectivity During Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[28]  Jie Tian,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Hand Motor Recovery after Sub-Acute Stroke: A Study Combined fMRI with Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Steven C. Cramer Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[30]  L. Der-Yeghiaian,et al.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  Steven C. Cramer,et al.  Resting-state cortical connectivity predicts motor skill acquisition , 2014, NeuroImage.

[32]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Anatomy of Stroke Injury Predicts Gains From Therapy , 2011, Stroke.

[33]  Sergei V. Adamovich,et al.  Resting state functional connectivity and task-related effective connectivity changes after upper extremity rehabilitation: a pilot study , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  Dongrong Xu,et al.  Altered topological properties of the cortical motor‐related network in patients with subcortical stroke revealed by graph theoretical analysis , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Don M. Tucker,et al.  Localizing Acute Stroke-related EEG Changes:: Assessing the Effects of Spatial Undersampling , 2001, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[36]  Steven C. Cramer,et al.  Somatotopy and movement representation sites following cortical stroke , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  M. Hallett,et al.  Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Bradley D. Hatfield,et al.  Electroencephalographic Coherence During Visuomotor Performance: A Comparison of Cortico-Cortical Communication in Experts and Novices , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[39]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain , 2013, NeuroImage.

[40]  S. Cramer,et al.  Biomarkers and Predictors of Restorative Therapy Effects After Stroke , 2013, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports.

[41]  Nicholas A. Ketz,et al.  Enhanced Brain Correlations during Rest Are Related to Memory for Recent Experiences , 2010, Neuron.

[42]  S. Cramer,et al.  Targeted engagement of a dorsal premotor circuit in the treatment of post-stroke paresis. , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.

[43]  R. Homan,et al.  Cerebral location of international 10-20 system electrode placement. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[44]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke , 2010, Neurology.

[45]  G. Fink,et al.  Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  Liang Wang,et al.  Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[47]  Lili Tian,et al.  Linear combination methods to improve diagnostic/prognostic accuracy on future observations , 2016, Statistical methods in medical research.

[48]  Miles A Whittington,et al.  A beta2-frequency (20–30 Hz) oscillation in nonsynaptic networks of somatosensory cortex , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Repairing the human brain after stroke. II. Restorative therapies , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[50]  M. Viergever,et al.  Recovery of Sensorimotor Function after Experimental Stroke Correlates with Restoration of Resting-State Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  B Saltzberg,et al.  Electrophysiological measures of regional neural interactive coupling. Linear and non-linear dependence relationships among multiple channel electroencephalographic recordings. , 1986, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[52]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Early imaging correlates of subsequent motor recovery after stroke , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[53]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[54]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Upstream Dysfunction of Somatomotor Functional Connectivity After Corticospinal Damage in Stroke , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[55]  P. Nunez,et al.  Electric fields of the brain , 1981 .

[56]  Jeffrey D. Riley,et al.  A multimodal approach to understanding motor impairment and disability after stroke , 2014, Journal of Neurology.

[57]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Post-movement beta synchronization. A correlate of an idling motor area? , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[58]  Cathy C. Y. Chou,et al.  A Standardized Approach to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Its Implications for Clinical Trials , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[59]  S. Rathore,et al.  Characterization of Incident Stroke Signs and Symptoms: Findings From the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study , 2002, Stroke.

[60]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Direct orthogonal signal correction , 2001 .

[61]  Robert Lindenberg,et al.  Lesion Load of the Corticospinal Tract Predicts Motor Impairment in Chronic Stroke , 2010, Stroke.

[62]  J. Saver,et al.  Statistical Analysis of the Primary Outcome in Acute Stroke Trials , 2012, Stroke.

[63]  Gary F. Egan,et al.  Evolution of Brain Activation with Good and Poor Motor Recovery after Stroke , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[64]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[65]  G. Fink,et al.  Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[66]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[67]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Resting State Changes in Functional Connectivity Correlate With Movement Recovery for BCI and Robot-Assisted Upper-Extremity Training After Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[68]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[69]  F. Cincotti,et al.  Evaluation of the Brain Network Organization From EEG Signals: A Preliminary Evidence in Stroke Patient , 2009, Anatomical record.

[70]  Rasmus Bro,et al.  The N-way Toolbox for MATLAB , 2000 .

[71]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke , 2011, NeuroImage.

[72]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Brain Connectivity Related to Working Memory Performance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[73]  I. Miyai,et al.  Near-infrared Spectroscopy–mediated Neurofeedback Enhances Efficacy of Motor Imagery–based Training in Poststroke Victims: A Pilot Study , 2013, Stroke.