Tumor Texture Analysis in PET: Where Do We Stand?

The coexistence of different tumor cells that show distinct morphologic and phenotypic features either within a tumor or between tumors defines tumor heterogeneity. The identification, characterization, understanding, and, possibly, treatment of tumor heterogeneity are key challenges in oncology and should help design effective therapeutic and monitoring strategies (1). Because biopsies probe only parts of the tumors, they do not necessarily reflect tumor heterogeneity (2). Additional techniques are needed, among which imaging is an appealing approach to comprehensively detect, depict, and quantify local variations in tumor morphology and function. Several hundred published articles have investigated the beneficial information that can be extracted from the analysis of tumor heterogeneity using imaging since the beginning of the nineties, mostly involving MR and ultrasonography (.70% of the articles) (3), with a significant increase in publications since 2008. The interest in exploring tumor heterogeneity using PET dates back to 2009 (4) and is conceptually quite appealing given that PET reflects the biology of the tumor. Yet, a synthetic synopsis of the published results and subsequent

[1]  M. Hatt,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  F E Turkheimer,et al.  Quantification of intra-tumour cell proliferation heterogeneity using imaging descriptors of 18F fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Tumor Texture Analysis in 18F-FDG PET: Relationships Between Texture Parameters, Histogram Indices, Standardized Uptake Values, Metabolic Volumes, and Total Lesion Glycolysis , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  P. Lambin,et al.  Stability of FDG-PET Radiomics features: An integrated analysis of test-retest and inter-observer variability , 2013, Acta oncologica.

[5]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  F. Brooks,et al.  The Effect of Small Tumor Volumes on Studies of Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Tracer Uptake , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Correlation of Intra-Tumor 18F-FDG Uptake Heterogeneity Indices with Perfusion CT Derived Parameters in Colorectal Cancer , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  P. Marsden,et al.  False Discovery Rates in PET and CT Studies with Texture Features: A Systematic Review , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  M. Hatt,et al.  Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  S. Fürst,et al.  Evaluation of 18F-Fluoride PET/MR and PET/CT in Patients with Foot Pain of Unclear Cause , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  M. Hatt,et al.  Robustness of intratumour 18F-FDG PET uptake heterogeneity quantification for therapy response prediction in oesophageal carcinoma , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  D. Townsend,et al.  Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  K. Polyak,et al.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[16]  W. Niessen,et al.  Quantification of Heterogeneity as a Biomarker in Tumor Imaging: A Systematic Review , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Baseline 18F-FDG PET image-derived parameters for therapy response prediction in oesophageal cancer , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  R. Jeraj,et al.  Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[19]  G. Parker,et al.  Imaging Intratumor Heterogeneity: Role in Therapy Response, Resistance, and Clinical Outcome , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.