High shear rheology and anisotropy in concentrated solutions of monoclonal antibodies.

The high shear rheology of three concentrated solutions of immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibodies (mAb1, mAb2, and mAb3), differing only in their complementarity determining regions, was characterized using rotary and capillary rheometry. The more viscous solutions (mAb1 and mAb3) showed non-Newtonian behavior at high shear rates exhibiting both shear thinning and appreciable normal stress differences (NSDs) in the shear rate range γ = 10 to 10(4) s(-1) . The rheograms were retraced after γ is increased and decreased, suggesting reversible self-associations under shear. In contrast, mAb2 solutions showed Newtonian behavior up to γ = 6 × 10(4) s(-1) . The critical shear stress τc , corresponding to the onset of the reduction in the viscosity η, is a measure of mAb equilibrium cluster strength and increased rapidly with concentration for the high viscosity mAb solutions above 100 mg/mL. In addition, decreasing the temperature from 20°C to 5°C increased η at low γ, but shear-thinning was enhanced and its onset occurred at a lower γc . Using an Arrhenius model η = A exp(Ea /kT), the activation energy for viscous flow Ea was found to decrease for mAb1 solutions as γ was increased from 10 to 10(4) s(-1) , suggesting mAb cluster disruption or rearrangement under shear. In contrast, for mAb2, this Ea remained constant in the γ range. Finally, mAb1 and mAb3 solutions showed appreciable NSDs, with their N1 > 0 scaling linearly with γ in the range 10(3) to 10(4) s(-1) , whereas their |N2 /N1 | was less than 0.25 in this region. These suggest anisotropy and deformation of their solution microstructure toward the extensional quadrant of the flow at high γ. In contrast, the NSDs for mAb2 were close to zero indicating that the solution microstructure under shear is practically isotropic.

[1]  J. Brady,et al.  Structure, diffusion and rheology of Brownian suspensions by Stokesian Dynamics simulation , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Jeffrey F. Morris,et al.  A review of microstructure in concentrated suspensions and its implications for rheology and bulk flow , 2009 .

[3]  P. Baglioni,et al.  Lysozyme protein solution with an intermediate range order structure. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[4]  D. Leighton,et al.  Normal stress and diffusion in a dilute suspension of hard spheres undergoing simple shear , 2001 .

[5]  N. Wagner,et al.  Colloidal Suspension Rheology: Frontmatter , 2011 .

[6]  S. A. Hutcheson,et al.  A comparison of three different methods for measuring both normal stress differences of viscoelastic liquids in torsional rheometers , 2009 .

[7]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  Specific interactions in high concentration antibody solutions resulting in high viscosity. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[8]  Tim J Kamerzell,et al.  Increasing IgG concentration modulates the conformational heterogeneity and bonding network that influence solution properties. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[9]  K. Monkos Viscosity analysis of the temperature dependence of the solution conformation of ovalbumin. , 2000, Biophysical chemistry.

[10]  W. Kulicke,et al.  Inertial normal-force corrections in rotational rheometry , 1977 .

[11]  R. Turian Perturbation Solution of the Steady Newtonian Flow in the Cone and Plate and Parallel Plate Systems , 1972 .

[12]  G. McKinley,et al.  The normal stress behaviour of suspensions with viscoelastic matrix fluids , 2002 .

[13]  Wessel,et al.  Fractal aggregates and gels in shear flow. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[14]  B. Chae,et al.  The scaling behavior of a highly aggregated colloidal suspension microstructure and its change in shear flow , 2004 .

[15]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Reversible self-association increases the viscosity of a concentrated monoclonal antibody in aqueous solution. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[16]  David T. Leighton,et al.  The characterization of the total stress of concentrated suspensions of noncolloidal spheres in Newtonian fluids , 2000 .

[17]  E. Brown,et al.  Through Thick and Thin , 2011, Science.

[18]  The measurement of suspension rheology , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Reversible self-association of a concentrated monoclonal antibody solution mediated by Fab-Fab interaction that impacts solution viscosity. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[20]  T. Patapoff,et al.  Construction, MD simulation, and hydrodynamic validation of an all-atom model of a monoclonal IgG antibody. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[21]  M. Behr,et al.  Restructuring of colloidal aggregates in shear flows and limitations of the free-draining approximation. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[22]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Coarse-grained modeling of the self-association of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[23]  T. Patapoff,et al.  Polysorbate 20 prevents the precipitation of a monoclonal antibody during shear , 2009 .

[24]  J. Brady,et al.  Hydrodynamic stress on fractal aggregates of spheres , 1991 .

[25]  L. Cipelletti,et al.  Jamming phase diagram for attractive particles , 2001, Nature.

[26]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  The role of amino acid sequence in the self-association of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: insights from coarse-grained modeling. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[27]  A. Minton,et al.  Intermolecular interactions of IgG1 monoclonal antibodies at high concentrations characterized by light scattering. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  R. Bird Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids , 1977 .

[29]  R. Colby Structure and linear viscoelasticity of flexible polymer solutions: comparison of polyelectrolyte and neutral polymer solutions , 2010 .

[30]  Xiang Cheng,et al.  Imaging the Microscopic Structure of Shear Thinning and Thickening Colloidal Suspensions , 2011, Science.

[31]  Joey Pollastrini,et al.  Response of a concentrated monoclonal antibody formulation to high shear , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[32]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  Factors affecting the viscosity in high concentration solutions of different monoclonal antibodies. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[33]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  The influence of charge distribution on self-association and viscosity behavior of monoclonal antibody solutions. , 2012, Molecular pharmaceutics.