BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes

[1]  F. Peintinger,et al.  Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with complete ADM or synthetic mesh coverage - 36-Months follow-up in 200 reconstructed breasts. , 2019, Breast.

[2]  S. Cawthorn,et al.  Short-term safety outcomes of mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with and without mesh (iBRA): a multicentre, prospective cohort study , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  Jaime S. Cardoso,et al.  The value of 3D images in the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Results from a prospective multicentric clinical trial. , 2018, Breast.

[4]  M. Mullender,et al.  Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  E. Hansson,et al.  Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery.

[6]  S. Kwei,et al.  A 3D Mammometric Comparison of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) , 2018, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[7]  C. Kirwan,et al.  Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[8]  D. Cromwell,et al.  National trends in immediate and delayed post-mastectomy reconstruction procedures in England: A seven-year population-based cohort study. , 2016, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  A. Ashikari,et al.  Acellular Dermal Matrix–Assisted Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction and Capsular Contracture: A 13-Year Experience , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  W. G. Stevens,et al.  Nine-Year Core Study Data for Sientra's FDA-Approved Round and Shaped Implants with High-Strength Cohesive Silicone Gel. , 2016, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[11]  J. Harvey,et al.  Systematic review of the effectiveness of polyurethane-coated compared with textured silicone implants in breast surgery. , 2016, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[12]  Sung-Won Kim,et al.  Objective Measurement of Cosmetic Outcomes of Breast Conserving Therapy Using BCCT.core , 2015, Cancer research and treatment : official journal of Korean Cancer Association.

[13]  K. Lee,et al.  Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  S. Bianchi,et al.  Subcutaneous Tissue Expander Placement with Synthetic Titanium-Coated Mesh in Breast Reconstruction: Long-term Results , 2015, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[15]  Bernard T. Lee,et al.  Does Acellular Dermal Matrix Really Improve Aesthetic Outcome in Tissue Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction? , 2015, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[16]  S. Maass,et al.  Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[17]  G. Maxwell,et al.  Ten-Year Results From the Natrelle 410 Anatomical Form-Stable Silicone Breast Implant Core Study , 2015, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[18]  M. Marks,et al.  Aesthetic Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction , 2014, Annals of plastic surgery.

[19]  S. Spear,et al.  Natrelle Round Silicone Breast Implants: Core Study Results at 10 Years , 2014, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  M. Schmitz,et al.  Experimental total wrapping of breast implants with acellular dermal matrix: a preventive tool against capsular contracture in breast surgery? , 2013, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[21]  P. Cordeiro,et al.  A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  A. Seth,et al.  Esthetic Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction , 2012, Eplasty.

[23]  G. Maxwell,et al.  Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years. , 2012, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[24]  J. Lipa,et al.  Comparison of Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[25]  A. Ashikari,et al.  An 8-Year Experience of Direct-to-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using Human Acellular Dermal Matrix (AlloDerm) , 2011, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[26]  S. Cawthorn,et al.  Reporting clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a systematic review. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  S. Cawthorn,et al.  Assessment of Cosmesis After Breast Reconstruction Surgery: a Systematic Review , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[28]  R. Timman,et al.  Surgical Results, Aesthetic Outcome, and Patient Satisfaction after Microsurgical Autologous Breast Reconstruction following Failed Implant Reconstruction , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[29]  David W. Taggart,et al.  No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations , 2009, The Lancet.

[30]  R. Silverman,et al.  The Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix to Prevent Capsule Formation around Implants in a Primate Model , 2009, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[31]  S. Spear,et al.  Inamed Silicone Breast Implant Core Study Results at 6 Years , 2007, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[32]  A. Colwell,et al.  Inferolateral AlloDerm Hammock for Implant Coverage in Breast Reconstruction , 2007, Annals of plastic surgery.

[33]  S. Warren,et al.  Immediate Bilateral Breast Reconstruction With Implants and Inferolateral AlloDerm Slings , 2005, Annals of plastic surgery.

[34]  K. Clough,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Late Cosmetic Results following Breast Reconstruction: II. TRAM Flap Reconstruction , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[35]  S. Spear,et al.  Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction. , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[36]  L. Gylbert.  Applanation tonometry for the evaluation of breast compressibility. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.