Clicking position and user posting behavior in online review systems: A data-driven agent-based modeling approach

Abstract In online review systems, a participant's level of knowledge impacts his/her posting behaviors, and an increase in knowledge occurs when the participant reads the reviews posted on the systems. To capture the collective dynamics of posting reviews, we used real-world big data collected over 153 months to drive an agent-based model for replicating the operation process of online review systems. The model explains the effects of clicking position (e.g., on a review webpage's serial list) and the number of items per webpage on posting contributions. Reading reviews from the last webpage only, or from the first webpage and last webpage simultaneously, can promote a greater review volume than reading reviews in other positions. This illustrates that representing primacy (first items) and recency (recent items) within one page simultaneously, or displaying recent items in reverse chronological order, are relatively better strategies for the webpage display of online reviews. The number of items plays a nonlinear moderating role in bridging the clicking position and posting behavior, and we determine the optimal number of items. To effectively establish strategies for webpage design in online review systems, business managers must switch from reliance on experience to reliance on an agent-based model as a decision support system for the formalized webpage design of online review systems.

[1]  Dwight A. Hennessy,et al.  The impact of primacy/recency effects and hazard monitoring on attributions of other drivers , 2016 .

[2]  T. Hirschi Causes of Delinquency. , 1970, British medical journal.

[3]  Costas Panagopoulos Timing Is Everything? Primacy and Recency Effects in Voter Mobilization Campaigns , 2011 .

[4]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[5]  Feng Mai,et al.  The effect of online reviews on product sales: A joint sentiment-topic analysis , 2019, Inf. Manag..

[6]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .

[7]  Chin-Lung Hsu,et al.  Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Primacy and Recency Effects on Clicking Behavior , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Zhijie Lin,et al.  Online Customer Reviews and Consumer Evaluation: The Role of Review Font , 2017 .

[12]  V. A. Tadipatri,et al.  Neural oscillations associated with the primacy and recency effects of verbal working memory , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  David B. Griswold,et al.  Social Control Theory and Delinquency. , 1981 .

[14]  C. J. Wolfe,et al.  Knowledge Sharing: The Effects of Incentives, Environment, and Person , 2008, J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The online consumer's hierarchy of needs , 2007, CACM.

[16]  Serap Unal,et al.  Does the amount of on-screen text influence student learning from a multimedia-based instructional unit? , 2008 .

[17]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[19]  J. Krosnick,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF A COGNITIVE THEORY OF RESPONSE-ORDER EFFECTS IN SURVEY MEASUREMENT , 1987 .

[20]  Rathindra Sarathy,et al.  An experimental investigation of the influence of website emotional design features on trust in unfamiliar online vendors , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Lei Shi,et al.  Asynchronous group consensus for discrete-time heterogeneous multi-agent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies , 2018, Inf. Sci..

[22]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Modeling Web Site Design Across Cultures: Relationships to Trust, Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Robert G. Sargent,et al.  An introductory tutorial on verification and validation of simulation models , 2015, 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[24]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[25]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[26]  Shan Liu,et al.  Agent-based modeling and simulation of the decision behaviors of e-retailers , 2018, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[27]  Robert G. Sargent,et al.  An introduction to verification and validation of simulation models , 2013, 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC).

[28]  Guoyin Jiang,et al.  Evolution of knowledge sharing behavior in social commerce: An agent-based computational approach , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[29]  Jeff Tian,et al.  Improving Web Navigation Usability by Comparing Actual and Anticipated Usage , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[30]  Jun Kong,et al.  User experience with web browsing on small screens: Experimental investigations of mobile-page interface design and homepage design for news websites , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[31]  I. Ajzen Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. , 2002 .

[32]  Carlos Ochoa,et al.  An experiment comparing grids and item-by-item formats in web surveys completed through PCs and smartphones , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[33]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Design of Web Survey Questionnaires: Three Basic Experiments , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Wenchao Xu,et al.  Aspect based fine-grained sentiment analysis for online reviews , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[35]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Linking objective design factors with subjective aesthetics: An experimental study on how structure and color of websites affect the facets of users' visual aesthetic perception , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Giorgio Fagiolo,et al.  Validation of Agent-Based Models in Economics and Finance , 2019, Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications.

[37]  Roberto Leombruni,et al.  A Common Protocol for Agent-Based Social Simulation , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[38]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Agent-Based Models , 2007 .

[39]  Per Carlbring,et al.  Web-based measurement: Effect of completing single or multiple items per webpage , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Understanding knowledge contributors' satisfaction in transactional virtual communities: A cost-benefit trade-off perspective , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[41]  Bin Gu,et al.  Measuring and Managing the Externality of Managerial Responses to Online Customer Reviews , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Lena Steinhoff,et al.  Primacy versus recency effects in extended service encounters , 2013 .

[43]  Dah-Kwei Liou,et al.  The study of the antecedents of knowledge sharing behavior: The empirical study of Yambol online test community , 2016, Internet Res..

[44]  Jian Sun,et al.  Event-Triggered Consensus for Linear Continuous-time Multi-agent Systems Based on a Predictor , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[45]  Le Wang,et al.  Knowledge contribution behavior in online Q&A communities: An empirical investigation , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling to Inform Online Community Design: Impact of Topical Breadth, Message Volume, and Discussion Moderation on Member Commitment and Contribution , 2014, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  Elmar Kiesling,et al.  Innovation diffusion of repeat purchase products in a competitive market: An agent-based simulation approach , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..