Combining Positron Emission Particle Tracking and image analysis to interpret particle motion in froths

Abstract Previous research into particle motion in the froth zone has focussed on constructing detailed CFD models that describe the behaviour of particle classes with different properties; density, size and hydrophobicity. These models have been reasonably successful in predicting trends in the separation behaviour and how it can be manipulated. Models of separation sub-processes cannot readily be verified experimentally due to the opacity and fragility of froth systems. Positron Emission Particle Tracking (PEPT) can be applied to particles in froth flotation systems to observe the behaviour of individual particles in a mixed particle–liquid–gas system. However, measuring the particle position alone is not adequate as its behaviour is also affected by instantaneous froth events such as bubble coalescence. To link the observed particle behaviour to the froth behaviour requires multi-modal measurements. Video footage of a rising foam column was recorded simultaneously with PEPT data, so that the PEPT tracer trajectory could be explained in terms of foam structure and events. A time weighting function of cubic splines with kernel width 200 ms was used to remove the effects of signal noise. An ascending 70 μm hydrophilic tracer accelerated within vertical Plateau borders and decelerated in Plateau borders angled away from vertical. The tracer trajectory showed velocity peaks and troughs when it was contained in nodes in a rising foam. When the tracer descended within a foam showing convective roll, coalescence events and subsequent foam deformation directly influenced the tracer trajectory.

[1]  P. Grassia,et al.  Strain and liquid content of sheared stretching foams : a model for dynamic dilatancy , 2009 .

[2]  R. Pugh Foaming, foam films, antifoaming and defoaming , 1996 .

[3]  Xianfeng Fan,et al.  Positron emission particle tracking as a method to map the movement of particles in the pulp and froth phases , 2008 .

[4]  J. Cilliers,et al.  Modelling flotation froths , 2003 .

[5]  David Parker,et al.  Enhancing 18F uptake in a single particle for positron emission particle tracking through modification of solid surface chemistry , 2006 .

[6]  Douglas Hatfield The implications of froth structure and surface appearance for flotation performance , 2006 .

[7]  J. Cilliers,et al.  PEPT combined with high speed digital imaging for particle tracking in dynamic foams , 2010 .

[8]  David Parker,et al.  Positron emission particle tracking in a mechanically agitated solid–liquid suspension of coarse particles , 2009 .

[9]  Xianfeng Fan,et al.  Labelling a single particle for positron emission particle tracking using direct activation and ion-exchange techniques , 2006 .

[10]  Drainage induced convection rolls in foams , 2007 .

[11]  P. Fowles,et al.  Positron emission particle tracking using the new Birmingham positron camera , 2002 .

[12]  M. R. Hawkesworth,et al.  Positron emission particle tracking - a technique for studying flow within engineering equipment , 1993 .

[13]  G. Jameson,et al.  Tracking of particles in the froth phase: An experimental technique , 2006 .

[14]  Stephen J. Neethling,et al.  Particle and liquid dispersion in foams , 2005 .

[15]  Stephen J. Neethling,et al.  Solids motion in flowing froths , 2002 .

[16]  Mechanisms for the onset of convective instability in foams , 2006 .

[17]  J. Cilliers,et al.  The use of positron emission particle tracking as a method for tracking particles in flotation froths , 2008 .

[18]  S. Takagi,et al.  Coarse particles sedimentation within a quasi two-dimensional rising foam , 2007 .