Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework

[1]  E. Ostrom.  Institutional Rational Choice , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[2]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Series: Clinical Epidemiology in South Africa. Paper 3: Logic models help make sense of complexity in systematic reviews and health technology assessments. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[3]  Tracy Finch,et al.  Implementation, context and complexity , 2016, Implementation Science.

[4]  Jacob Burns,et al.  Effectiveness of interventions to reduce exposure to lead through consumer products and drinking water: A systematic review. , 2016, Environmental research.

[5]  E. Rehfuess,et al.  An approach for setting evidence-based and stakeholder-informed research priorities in low- and middle-income countries , 2015, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[6]  Dario Sacchini,et al.  Integrated assessment of home based palliative care with and without reinforced caregiver support: ‘A demonstration of INTEGRATE-HTA methodological guidances’ – Executive Summary , 2016 .

[7]  David Moher,et al.  The REporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) Statement: Methods for Arriving at Consensus and Developing Reporting Guidelines , 2015, PloS one.

[8]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Effectiveness of strategies to facilitate uptake or implementation of complex interventions: A systematic review of reviews , 2015, Implementation Science.

[9]  Gabriele Meyer,et al.  Criteria for Reporting the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions in healthcare: revised guideline (CReDECI 2) , 2015, Trials.

[10]  Susan Michie,et al.  Understanding context in knowledge translation: a concept analysis study protocol. , 2015, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  P. Nilsen.  Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks , 2015, Implementation Science.

[12]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Developing standards for reporting implementation studies of complex interventions (StaRI): a systematic review and e-Delphi , 2015, Implementation Science.

[13]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Context and implementation: A concept analysis towards conceptual maturity. , 2015, Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen.

[15]  Danielle L. Fettes,et al.  Collaboration, Negotiation, and Coalescence for Interagency-Collaborative Teams to Scale-Up Evidence-Based Practice , 2014, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[16]  Anthony Herbert,et al.  Home telehealth and paediatric palliative care: clinician perceptions of what is stopping us? , 2014, BMC Palliative Care.

[17]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Reporting of context and implementation in studies of global health interventions: a pilot study , 2014, Implementation Science.

[18]  Susanne Breitner,et al.  Evaluation of the Impact of Low Emission Zone and Heavy Traffic Ban in Munich (Germany) on the Reduction of PM10 in Ambient Air , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[19]  Jacob Burns,et al.  Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health , 2014 .

[20]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Evidence-based de-implementation for contradicted, unproven, and aspiring healthcare practices , 2014, Implementation Science.

[21]  Enola K Proctor,et al.  Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting , 2013, Implementation Science.

[22]  J. Chamova,et al.  European network for health technology assessment – EUnetHTA , 2013 .

[23]  Pamela Ohman-Strickland,et al.  Effect of air pollution control on mortality and hospital admissions in Ireland. , 2013, Research report.

[24]  Diane Hauser,et al.  Context Matters: The Experience of 14 Research Teams in Systematically Reporting Contextual Factors Important for Practice Change , 2013, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[25]  Richard Baker,et al.  A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice , 2013, Implementation Science.

[26]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework , 2013, Implementation Science.

[27]  D. Groneberg,et al.  Introduction of a low-emission zone and the effect on air pollutant concentration of particulate matter (PM10) — a pilot study in Munich , 2013, Zentralblatt für Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz und Ergonomie.

[28]  Stephenie R. Chaudoir,et al.  Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures , 2013, Implementation Science.

[29]  C. May.  Towards a general theory of implementation , 2013, Implementation Science.

[30]  Eveline Hage,et al.  Implementation factors and their effect on e-Health service adoption in rural communities: a systematic literature review , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[31]  T. Packard.  Organizational Change: A Conceptual Framework to Advance the Evidence Base , 2013 .

[32]  P. Pronovost,et al.  Drivers and Barriers in Health IT Adoption , 2012, Applied Clinical Informatics.

[33]  L. Wallin,et al.  Knowledge translation in Uganda: a qualitative study of Ugandan midwives’ and managers’ perceived relevance of the sub-elements of the context cornerstone in the PARIHS framework , 2012, Implementation Science.

[34]  Abraham Wandersman,et al.  The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process , 2012, American journal of community psychology.

[35]  E. Araral,et al.  The institutional analysis and development framework , 2012 .

[36]  Brian Williams,et al.  Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions , 2012, Trials.

[37]  S. Michie,et al.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research , 2012, Implementation Science.

[38]  Leah Bartley,et al.  Active Implementation Frameworks for Program Success: How to Use Implementation Science to Improve Outcomes for Children. , 2012 .

[39]  Shin-Ping Tu,et al.  Systems Antecedents for Dissemination and Implementation , 2012, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[40]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Essential components of public health evidence reviews: capturing intervention complexity, implementation, economics and equity. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[41]  Christian D Helfrich,et al.  A Guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation , 2011, Implementation Science : IS.

[42]  L. Damschroder,et al.  A guiding framework and approach for implementation research in substance use disorders treatment. , 2011, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[43]  Andrew Booth,et al.  A worked example of "best fit" framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.

[44]  Debra Kramlich,et al.  An Introduction to the Multisystem Model of Knowledge Integration and Translation , 2011, ANS. Advances in nursing science.

[45]  D. Simpson,et al.  A Framework for Implementing Sustainable Oral Health Promotion Interventions. , 2011, Journal of public health dentistry.

[46]  G. Aarons,et al.  Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors , 2010, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[47]  J. Bellemans,et al.  Key interventions and outcomes in joint arthroplasty clinical pathways: a systematic review. , 2010, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[48]  H. R. Anderson,et al.  The impact of the congestion charging scheme on ambient air pollution concentrations in London , 2009 .

[49]  J. Lowery,et al.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[50]  C. Helfrich,et al.  Implementation Science Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (orca): Development of an Instrument Based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (parihs) Framework , 2022 .

[51]  Dean L. Fixsen,et al.  Core Implementation Components , 2009 .

[52]  C. Dowrick,et al.  Implementation Science Development of a Theory of Implementation and Integration: Normalization Process Theory , 2022 .

[53]  Bryan J Weiner,et al.  Using organization theory to understand the determinants of effective implementation of worksite health promotion programs. , 2008, Health education research.

[54]  C. Holzmueller,et al.  The team checkup tool: evaluating QI team activities and giving feedback to senior leaders. , 2008, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[55]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Guidance for considering ethical, legal, and social issues in health technology assessment: Application to genetic screening , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[56]  P. Groenewegen,et al.  Developing and testing an instrument to measure the presence of conditions for successful implementation of quality improvement collaboratives , 2008, BMC health services research.

[57]  Ross C Brownson,et al.  A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. , 2008, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[58]  B. Armstrong,et al.  Air pollution and mortality benefits of the London Congestion Charge: spatial and socioeconomic inequalities , 2008, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[59]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[60]  K. Kelleher,et al.  Assessing the Organizational Social Context (OSC) of Mental Health Services: Implications for Research and Practice , 2008, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[61]  Tony K. Quon,et al.  The Organizational Learning Survey: A Re-Evaluation of Unidimensionality , 2007, Psychological reports.

[62]  Elizabeth Murray,et al.  Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: the normalization process model , 2007, BMC Health Services Research.

[63]  D. Mohr,et al.  Assessing an organizational culture instrument based on the Competing Values Framework: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses , 2007, Implementation science : IS.

[64]  Bryn Williams-Jones,et al.  Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[65]  R. Aunger,et al.  Consolidating Behaviour Change Theory , 2007 .

[66]  Peter Mendel,et al.  Interventions in Organizational and Community Context: A Framework for Building Evidence on Dissemination and Implementation in Health Services Research , 2007, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research.

[67]  Jean-Pierre Habicht,et al.  Context matters: interpreting impact findings in child survival evaluations. , 2005, Health policy and planning.

[68]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions , 2005, Journal of health services research & policy.

[69]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[70]  Gro Ellen Mathisen,et al.  Climate for work group creativity and innovation: Norwegian validation of the team climate inventory (TCI). , 2004, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[71]  Lawrence W. Green,et al.  Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach , 2004 .

[72]  Felipe González Castro,et al.  The Cultural Adaptation of Prevention Interventions: Resolving Tensions Between Fidelity and Fit , 2004, Prevention Science.

[73]  B. Israel,et al.  Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community-based participatory research partnerships , 2003 .

[74]  Karen E. Watkins,et al.  Demonstrating the Value of an Organization's Learning Culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire , 2003 .

[75]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[76]  D. Simpson,et al.  Assessing organizational readiness for change. , 2002, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[77]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[78]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  Nursing Theory and Concept Development or Analysis Getting Evidence into Practice: the Meaning of 'context' , 2022 .

[79]  M. Frommer,et al.  Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[80]  A FRAMEWORK FOR DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF RCTs FOR COMPLEX INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE HEALTH , 2000 .

[81]  P. Sabatier.  Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[82]  A Kitson,et al.  Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. , 1998, Quality in health care : QHC.

[83]  K. Klein,et al.  The Challenge of Innovation Implementation , 1996 .

[84]  J. Morse,et al.  Criteria for concept evaluation. , 1996, Journal of advanced nursing.

[85]  D. Nutbeam,et al.  Health promotion glossary (1998) , 1998 .

[86]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[87]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[88]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[89]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[90]  D. Nelson,et al.  Effects of person-group and intragroup attitude similarity on perceived group attractiveness and cohesiveness , 1971 .

[91]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .