Is there a syllable frequency effect in aphasia or in apraxia of speech or both?

Background: The observation of a syllable frequency effect on production latencies in healthy speakers has been an argument in favour of stored syllables in speech production. In Levelt, Roelofs, and Meyer's (1999) model of speech production, syllabic representations are accessed during phonetic encoding. Neurolinguistic studies have provided convergent evidence of a syllable frequency effect on production accuracy in speakers with acquired language disorders. However, the observation that syllable frequency also affected production in aphasic speakers with a pre‐phonetic impairment (conduction aphasia and Wernicke's aphasia) seems in contradiction to the phonetic locus of syllabic representations. Aims: We illustrate the points of convergences and divergences between psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic results on the locus of the syllable frequency effect and explore whether a syllable frequency effect is observed in apraxia of speech (AoS) and in conduction aphasia when participants are tested with the same material. Methods & Procedures: Reading and repetition was elicited with monosyllabic words (Experiment A) and with bisyllabic pseudowords (Experiment B) composed of high‐ or low‐frequency syllables. Three speakers with AoS and three speakers with conduction aphasia participated in each experiment. Outcomes & Results: Both subgroups displayed a tendency for a syllable frequency effect on production accuracy. A significant effect of syllable frequency was observed in each experiment in a participant with AoS and in a participant with conduction aphasia. Conclusions: The data confirmed similar syllable frequency effects in speakers with AoS and in conduction aphasia when tested with the same eliciting material. We discuss these apparently contradictory observations and suggest an explanation for the origin of the syllable frequency effect in these two populations. I wish to thank Lindsey Nickels and Manuel Carreiras for their meticulous review and helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript. Research supported by Swiss National Science Foundation Grant No. 105312‐108284.

[1]  Wolfram Ziegler,et al.  Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech , 2004, Brain and Language.

[2]  Chris Code,et al.  Models, theories and heuristics in apraxia of speech , 1998 .

[3]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[4]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  A Comparison of Theoretical and Human Syllabification , 2001, Language and speech.

[5]  S. Kohn,et al.  Distinctions between two phonological output deficits , 1994, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[6]  P. Bonin,et al.  Syllabic priming effects in picture naming in French: lost in the sea! , 2006, Experimental psychology.

[7]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency , 2004, Brain and Language.

[8]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[9]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .

[10]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Disorders of phonological encoding , 1992, Cognition.

[11]  G W Humphreys,et al.  The syllable’s role in word naming , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[12]  N. Schiller.  Single word production in english: the role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  E. Kokmen,et al.  Motor Speech Disorders , 1976 .

[14]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked Priming of Word and Picture Naming: The Role of Syllabic Units ☆ , 1996 .

[15]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOUNGUISTICS , 2003 .

[16]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[17]  Jean-Luc Nespoulous,et al.  Syllables as units in speech production: Data from aphasia , 2003, Brain and Language.

[18]  Marina Laganaro,et al.  Syllable frequency effect in speech production: evidence from aphasia , 2005, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[19]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Patterns of phoneme and syllable frequency in jargon aphasia , 2005, Brain and Language.

[20]  Albert Costa,et al.  Phonological encoding of single words: In search of the lost syllable , 2002 .

[21]  P. Mousty,et al.  Brulex: une base de donne 'es lexicales informatise 'e pour le franc?ais e 'crit et parle , 1990 .

[22]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  F. Alario,et al.  On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production , 2006 .

[24]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Phonological encoding of single words: In search of the lost syllable , 2002 .

[25]  Sandra P. Whiteside,et al.  What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech , 2001 .

[26]  Wolfram Ziegler,et al.  Syllable frequency and syllable structure in the spontaneous speech production of patients with apraxia of speech , 2008 .

[27]  Nick Miller,et al.  Dual or duel route , 2001 .

[28]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Effects of syllable frequency in speech production , 2006, Cognition.