The relationship among modularity, functional coordination, and mass customization: Implications for competitiveness

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how product modularity (PM) is related to mass customization (MC) capability and plant competitiveness.Design/methodology/approach – The paper tests hypothesized relationships using structural equation modeling with an international dataset.Findings – PM is not directly related to plant competitiveness. Inter‐functional design coordination (IDC) is found to be critical in fostering plant competitiveness.Practical implications – Managers need to put IDC mechanisms in place to foster MC capabilities and, thereby, enhance plant competitiveness.Originality/value – While the existing literature mostly argues for a direct relationship between PM and competitiveness, the paper shows that IDC and MC capability are crucial intervening variables in this relationship.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  S. Venkatesh,et al.  Managing Product Variety Through Postponement: Concept and Applications , 2004 .

[3]  Barry Berman,et al.  Should your firm adopt a mass customization strategy , 2002 .

[4]  Rebecca Duray,et al.  Pursuing capabilities of flexibility and quality: financial performance implications for mass customisers , 2006 .

[5]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[6]  Bart L. MacCarthy,et al.  Fundamental Modes of Operation for Mass Customization , 2003 .

[7]  Giovani J.C. da Silveira,et al.  Mass customization: Literature review and research directions , 2001 .

[8]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[9]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  Gerhard Friedrich,et al.  Guest Editorial: Mass Customization Manufacturing Systems , 2007 .

[11]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities , 2004 .

[12]  M. Primo,et al.  An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes , 2002 .

[13]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[14]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[15]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: a Study of Automotive Braking Systems , 1999 .

[16]  Qiang Tu,et al.  Measuring Modularity-Based Manufacturing Practices and Their Impact on Mass Customization Capability: A Customer-Driven Perspective , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[17]  S. Davis.  Future Perfect , 1987 .

[18]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Perceptual measures of performance: Fact or fiction? , 2004 .

[19]  Samar K. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Local design vs. global design: A strategic business choice , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[21]  Rebecca Duray.  Mass customization origins: mass or custom manufacturing? , 2002 .

[22]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Managing in the Modular Age , 2002 .

[23]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Toward a Product System Modularity Construct: Literature Review and Reconceptualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Design for Postponement , 2003, Supply Chain Management.

[25]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Linking learning and effective process implementation to mass customization capability , 2008 .

[26]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[27]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Linking Work Design to Mass Customization: A Sociotechnical Systems Perspective , 2006, Decis. Sci..

[28]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  High performance manufacturing : global perspectives , 2001 .

[29]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[30]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Competing—and Learning—in Modular Markets , 2001 .

[31]  Ian P. McCarthy,et al.  Special issue editorial: the what, why and how of mass customization , 2004, Production Planning & Control.

[32]  Desmond Doran,et al.  Supplying on a modular basis: an examination of strategic issues , 2005 .

[33]  William L. Berry,et al.  Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation , 2000 .

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[35]  R. Sanchez.  Strategic flexibility in product competition , 1995 .

[36]  P. Cardona,et al.  Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry , 2002 .

[37]  K. W. Lau Antonio,et al.  The impacts of product modularity on competitive capabilities and performance: An empirical study , 2007 .

[38]  Ricardo Ernst,et al.  Evaluation of supply chain structures through modularization and postponement , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Panagiotis Kouvelis,et al.  Design strategy and its interface with manufacturing and marketing: A conceptual framework , 1991 .

[40]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[41]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Towards a Theory of Competitive Progression: Evidence from High‐Tech Manufacturing , 2004 .

[42]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[43]  Paul Hissel,et al.  Cost Management and Cross-Functional Communication Through Product Architectures , 2007 .

[44]  B. J. Pine,et al.  Making mass customization work , 1993 .

[45]  T. S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  The impact of time-based manufacturing practices on mass customization and value to customer , 2001 .

[46]  R. Schroeder,et al.  The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences , 2003 .

[47]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[48]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Integrated product and process design: A modularity perspective , 2002 .

[49]  Juliana H. Mikkola,et al.  Management of Product Architecture Modularity for Mass Customization: Modeling and Theoretical Considerations , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[50]  Xenophon Koufteros,et al.  Internal and External Integration for Product Development: The Contingency Effects of Uncertainty, Equivocality, and Platform Strategy , 2005, Decis. Sci..

[51]  Prakash Mirchandani,et al.  COMPONENT COMMONALITY: MODELS WITH PRODUCT‐SPECIFIC SERVICE CONSTRAINTS* , 2009 .

[52]  L. Harlow,et al.  Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices , 1995 .

[53]  Donald Gerwin,et al.  An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[54]  Pietro Romano,et al.  Improving inter‐functional coordination to face high product variety and frequent modifications , 2004 .

[55]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[56]  Stefano Lorenzi,et al.  Product modularity theory and practice: the benefits and difficulties in implementation within a company , 2001 .

[57]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[58]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.