Stem Cell Plasticity and Niche Dynamics in Cancer Progression

Objective: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been hypothesized to initiate and drive tumor growth and recurrence due to their self-renewal ability. If correct, this hypothesis implies that successful therapy must focus primarily on eradication of this CSC fraction. However, recent evidence suggests stemness is niche dependent and may represent one of many phenotypic states that can be accessed by many cancer genotypes when presented with specific environmental cues. A better understanding of the relationship of stemness to niche-related phenotypic plasticity could lead to alternative treatment strategies. Methods: Here, we investigate the role of environmental context in the expression of stem-like cell properties through in-silico simulation of ductal carcinoma. We develop a two-dimensional hybrid discrete-continuum cellular automata model to describe the single-cell scale dynamics of multicellular tissue formation. Through a suite of simulations, we investigate interactions between a phenotypically heterogeneous cancer cell population and a dynamic environment. Results: We generate homeostatic ductal structures that consist of a mixture of stem and differentiated cells governed by both intracellular and environmental dynamics. We demonstrate that a wide spectrum of tumor-like histologies can result from these structures by varying microenvironmental parameters. Conclusion: Niche driven phenotypic plasticity offers a simple first-principle explanation for the diverse ductal structures observed in histological sections from breast cancer. Significance: Conventional models of carcinogenesis largely focus on mutational events. We demonstrate that variations in the environmental niche can produce intraductal cancers independent of genetic changes in the resident cells. Therapies targeting the microenvironmental niche may offer an alternative cancer prevention strategy.

[1]  I. Malanchi,et al.  The EMT universe: space between cancer cell dissemination and metastasis initiation. , 2014, Critical reviews in oncogenesis.

[2]  M. Mimeault,et al.  Hypoxia-inducing factors as master regulators of stemness properties and altered metabolism of cancer- and metastasis-initiating cells , 2013, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[3]  B. Ross,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of PDGF-Driven Glioblastoma Reveals Optimized Radiation Dosing Schedules , 2014, Cell.

[4]  Heiko Enderling,et al.  Cancer stem cells: small subpopulation or evolving fraction? , 2015, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[5]  G. Koren,et al.  Hypoxia Enhances Tumor Stemness by Increasing the Invasive and Tumorigenic Side Population Fraction , 2008, Stem cells.

[6]  Guy S. Salvesen,et al.  SnapShot: Caspases , 2011, Cell.

[7]  Peter Dirks,et al.  Cancer stem cells: an evolving concept , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[8]  S. Sell On the stem cell origin of cancer. , 2010, The American journal of pathology.

[9]  V. Quaranta,et al.  Microenvironment driven invasion: a multiscale multimodel investigation , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[10]  S. Sell,et al.  Stem cell origin of cancer and differentiation therapy. , 2004, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[11]  L. Vermeulen,et al.  Cancer stem cell niche: the place to be. , 2011, Cancer research.

[12]  Bryan S. Griffiths,et al.  Nematode movement along a chemical gradient in a structurally heterogeneous environment. 1. Experiment , 1997 .

[13]  J. Laterra,et al.  Cancer stem cells: distinct entities or dynamically regulated phenotypes? , 2012, Cancer research.

[14]  R. A. ANDERSONa,et al.  Mathematical Modelling of Tumour Invasion and Metastasis , 2022 .

[15]  Hebao Yuan,et al.  Polarity in stem cell division: asymmetric stem cell division in tissue homeostasis. , 2010, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[16]  R. McLendon,et al.  Acidic stress promotes a glioma stem cell phenotype , 2011, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[17]  Z. Werb,et al.  Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. , 2011, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[18]  C. Brennan,et al.  Perivascular nitric oxide activates notch signaling and promotes stem-like character in PDGF-induced glioma cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[19]  J. Rich,et al.  Cancer stem cells in glioblastoma , 2015, Genes & development.

[20]  K. Schulze-Osthoff,et al.  Cancer stem cell markers in common cancers - therapeutic implications. , 2008, Trends in molecular medicine.

[21]  Philip Hahnfeldt,et al.  Non-stem cancer cell kinetics modulate solid tumor progression , 2011, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[22]  Daniel V. Veres,et al.  Cancer stem cells display extremely large evolvability: alternating plastic and rigid networks as a potential Mechanism: network models, novel therapeutic target strategies, and the contributions of hypoxia, inflammation and cellular senescence. , 2013, Seminars in cancer biology.

[23]  Georgia Panagiotakos,et al.  Inhibition of Notch Signaling in Glioblastoma Targets Cancer Stem Cells via an Endothelial Cell Intermediate , 2010, Stem cells.

[24]  Z. Werb,et al.  The cancer stem cell niche: how essential is the niche in regulating stemness of tumor cells? , 2015, Cell stem cell.

[25]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Continuous and discrete mathematical models of tumor-induced angiogenesis , 1998, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[26]  Jan Poleszczuk,et al.  Cancer Stem Cell Plasticity as Tumor Growth Promoter and Catalyst of Population Collapse , 2015, bioRxiv.

[27]  M. Karin,et al.  Tumor promotion via injury- and death-induced inflammation. , 2011, Immunity.

[28]  D. Scadden,et al.  The stem-cell niche as an entity of action , 2006, Nature.

[29]  Robert J Gillies,et al.  Impact of metabolic heterogeneity on tumor growth, invasion, and treatment outcomes. , 2015, Cancer research.

[30]  Louis Vermeulen,et al.  Wnt activity defines colon cancer stem cells and is regulated by the microenvironment , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  Fang Li,et al.  Apoptotic Cells Activate the “Phoenix Rising” Pathway to Promote Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration , 2010, Science Signaling.

[32]  Eshel Ben-Jacob,et al.  Towards elucidating the connection between epithelial–mesenchymal transitions and stemness , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  G. Calaf,et al.  The Stemness Phenotype Model , 2012, ISRN oncology.

[34]  Mina J Bissell,et al.  Context, tissue plasticity, and cancer: are tumor stem cells also regulated by the microenvironment? , 2005, Cancer cell.

[35]  R. Clarke,et al.  Tumor and Stem Cell Biology Cancer Research Regulation of Breast Cancer Stem Cell Activity by Signaling through the Notch 4 Receptor , 2010 .

[36]  David Basanta,et al.  Microenvironmental Variables Must Influence Intrinsic Phenotypic Parameters of Cancer Stem Cells to Affect Tumourigenicity , 2013, bioRxiv.

[37]  E. Holland,et al.  The Therapeutic Implications of Plasticity of the Cancer Stem Cell Phenotype , 2010, PloS one.

[38]  A. Anderson,et al.  A hybrid mathematical model of solid tumour invasion: the importance of cell adhesion , 2005 .

[39]  N ematode movement along a chemical gradient in a structurally heterogeneous environment . 2 . Theory , 2009 .

[40]  R. McLendon,et al.  The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype , 2009, Cell cycle.

[41]  Wenjun Guo,et al.  The Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Generates Cells with Properties of Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[42]  A. Jimeno,et al.  More than Markers: Biological Significance of Cancer Stem Cell-Defining Molecules , 2010, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.