Capturing country images: a methodological approach

ABSTRACT Country images have been notoriously difficult to capture and measure effectively. In this article, we propose a methodological approach that combines designed and found data to capture public attitudes. We demonstrate how a mixed-method design with survey data and digital data – namely tweets and Google Trends – make it possible to better capture what target audiences think about a country. We make the case for such a combination by highlighting three aspects of country images. First, to understand what different types of public think about a country, we need to listen to different voices, and complement standardised public opinion survey data with open questions and digital data. Second, social media platforms are invaluable data resources as well as outlets that people on social media turn to for news and information. Last, digital data is unique and powerful, but difficult to analyse and interpret to create value for developing strategic communication policies. Public opinion survey data can help structure digital data and link both outcomes with each other. We support our methodological arguments through an illustrative study of the South Korean country image. We conclude our article by presenting a roadmap for multi-method analysis.

[1]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Text Mining Infrastructure in R , 2008 .

[2]  E. Sevin Public Diplomacy and the Implementation of Foreign Policy in the US, Sweden and Turkey , 2017 .

[3]  H. Akin Unver,et al.  Computational International Relations: What Can Programming, Coding and Internet Research Do for the Discipline? , 2018, All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace.

[4]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Big Data in Survey Research AAPOR Task Force Report , 2015 .

[5]  K. Ayhan The Boundaries of Public Diplomacy and Nonstate Actors: A Taxonomy of Perspectives , 2018, International Studies Perspectives.

[6]  David Gertner A (tentative) meta-analysis of the ‘place marketing’ and ‘place branding’ literature , 2011 .

[7]  M. Hatch,et al.  The Elusive Destination Brand and the ATLAS Wheel of Place Brand Management , 2019 .

[8]  D. Ketchen A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling , 2013 .

[9]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[10]  B. Ghobrial Real-Time Diplomacy: Politics and Power in the Social Media Era , 2012 .

[11]  R. Hague,et al.  Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction , 1987 .

[12]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[13]  Philip M. Seib Real-Time Diplomacy: Politics and Power in the Social Media Era , 2012 .

[14]  Diana Ingenhoff,et al.  The 4D Model of the country image: An integrative approach from the perspective of communication management , 2015 .

[15]  Andrea Lucarelli,et al.  City branding: a state‐of‐the‐art review of the research domain , 2011 .

[16]  Mikael Andéhn,et al.  Re-imagining the country-of-origin effect: a promulgation approach , 2018, Journal of Product & Brand Management.

[17]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[18]  Tamara A. Small WHAT THE HASHTAG? , 2011 .

[19]  F. Conrad,et al.  Social Media Analyses for Social Measurement. , 2016, Public opinion quarterly.

[20]  K. Ayhan Rethinking Korea's Middle Power Diplomacy as a Nation Branding Project , 2019, Korea Observer - Institute of Korean Studies.

[21]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[22]  Mark Eisenegger,et al.  The True, the Good and the Beautiful: Reputation Management in the Media Society , 2008 .

[23]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[24]  H. E. Sevin,et al.  Understanding cities through city brands: City branding as a social and semantic network , 2014 .

[25]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2010 .

[26]  G. Rawnsley Challenging the snake-oil salesmen: a critique of British approaches to soft power , 2018 .

[27]  W. Cobb Trending now: Using big data to examine public opinion of space policy , 2015 .

[28]  S. Anholt Nation-brands of the twenty-first century , 1998 .

[29]  T. Just Promoting Russia abroad: Russia's post-Cold war national identity and public diplomacy , 2016 .

[30]  Eytan Gilboa Mass Communication and Diplomacy: A Theoretical Framework , 2000 .

[31]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[32]  H. Kang Contemporary cultural diplomacy in South Korea: explicit and implicit approaches , 2015 .

[33]  K. Dinnie Country-of-origin 1965-2004: a literature review , 2004 .

[34]  E. Sevin,et al.  Public Diplomacy on Social Media: Analyzing Networks and Content , 2018 .

[35]  Elliot T. Panek,et al.  It’s All about Me (or Us): Facebook Post Frequency & Focus as Related to Narcissism , 2018 .

[36]  Anthony D. Smith,et al.  The ethnic origins of nations , 1988 .

[37]  MARY A. SMITH,et al.  REPUTATION , 1913, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.