The interaction between general practitioners and occupational health professionals in relation to rehabilitation for work: a Delphi study.

BACKGROUND Anecdotally, communication between general practitioners (GPs) and occupational health professionals is poor and acts as a barrier to successful rehabilitation for work. It is not known how widely this view is held by the many stakeholders in rehabilitation for work, or how important the observation is in its effect. METHODS A Delphi study was conducted by initial semi-structured telephone interview, followed by a three-round collation and feedback of opinion by e-mail. The 25 participants were identified by suggestion within the study process for their position as key informants within a wide range of stakeholders. RESULTS The process generated a consensus statement which identifies the extremely important nature of rehabilitation for work, the crucial role by GPs, the central role of occupational health professionals in case management and the barrier represented by the often very poor communication between them. CONCLUSION The way forward is to improve communication by mutual education and understanding and a team approach to rehabilitation strategy. This may be facilitated by the GPs who work in occupational health and disability assessment and the involvement of other health professionals to great benefit for all stakeholders.

[1]  F. Hasson,et al.  A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. , 2001, International journal of nursing studies.

[2]  Priorities for understanding and managing occupational allergy: a Delphi Consensus * , 1993, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[3]  D. Morgan The general practitioners' view. , 1999, Occupational medicine.

[4]  K. Clute The General Practitioner , 1963 .

[5]  W. Mechelen,et al.  Ineffective disability management by doctors is an obstacle for return-to-work: a cohort study on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3–4 months , 2002, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[6]  F. Hasson,et al.  Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. , 2000, Journal of advanced nursing.

[7]  C Duffield,et al.  The Delphi technique. , 1988, The Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation.

[8]  H. Strachan Issues for future direction of nursing informatics in the UK: a delphi study , 1996 .

[9]  Juri Pill,et al.  The Delphi method: Substance, context, a critique and an annotated bibliography , 1971 .

[10]  J. Challenor,et al.  Current issues in fitness for work certification. , 2002, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[11]  F. van Dijk,et al.  Dutch occupational physicians and general practitioners wish to improve cooperation. , 1999, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[12]  S. Prakash,et al.  GENERAL PRACTITIONERS , 1856 .

[13]  J. Harrington,et al.  Research priorities in occupational medicine: a survey of United Kingdom medical opinion by the Delphi technique. , 1994, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[14]  S B Sharkey,et al.  An approach to consensus building using the Delphi technique: developing a learning resource in mental health. , 2001, Nurse education today.

[15]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[16]  E B Macdonald,et al.  Requirements for occupational medicine training in Europe: a Delphi study , 2000, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[17]  Cheryl Bagley Thompson,et al.  Minimum data set development: air transport time-related terms , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.