Confidence and accuracy in judgements using computer displayed information

Abstract Confidence and accuracy in decision making are often unrelated, contrary to popular belief. In practice, confidence is often relied upon as evidence of good decision making, since the quality of a decision is difficult to determine at the time the decision is made. Information systems are increasingly used to assist decision making in organizations. Researchers believe that task, information system, and human characteristics affect the relationship between accuracy and confidence. In this research, manipulation of task, system, or human characteristics that led to an increase in confidence in decision making did not lead to an increase in decision accuracy and vice versa. In this study decision accuracy was judged by a decision process measure instead of a decision outcome measure. It was observed that subjects who had higher numerical skills than spatial skills expressed significantly more confidence in their decisions in a problem solving task; however, decision accuracy scores were not signifi...

[1]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[2]  Jeremy D. Finn,et al.  Measurement and Evaluation. , 1973 .

[3]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Behavioral Decision Theory , 1977 .

[4]  R. M. Thorndike Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education , 1969 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[6]  V. L. Smith,et al.  Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: within- versus between-subjects correlations. , 1989, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived Informativeness of Facts. , 1977 .

[8]  Rebecca A. Henry,et al.  Accuracy and confidence in group judgment , 1989 .

[9]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Graphical and Color-Enhanced Information Presentation , 1985 .

[10]  P. Humphreys,et al.  Experiences with MAUD: Aiding decision structuring versus bootstrapping the decision maker☆ , 1980 .

[11]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a cumulative experimental approach , 1986, CACM.

[12]  S. Lichtenstein,et al.  Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?*1 , 1977 .

[13]  A. Wesman The DIFFERENTIAL APTITUDE Tests , 1952 .

[14]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Performance feedback improves the resolution of confidence judgments , 1988 .

[15]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Training for calibration. , 1980 .

[16]  H. Jungermann Speculations about decision-theoretic aids for personal decision making , 1980 .

[17]  D Zakay,et al.  Time pressure, training and decision effectiveness. , 1984, Ergonomics.

[18]  Spyros Makridakis,et al.  Factors affecting judgmental forecasts and confidence intervals , 1989 .

[19]  Thomas J. Schriber,et al.  Algorithmic Search in Management Decision Systems , 1980, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[20]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Unit weighting schemes for decision making , 1975 .

[21]  Kevin Keasey,et al.  Consensus and accuracy in accounting studies of decision-making: A note on a new measure of consensus , 1989 .

[22]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  COMPUTER GRAPHICS AS DECISION AIDS: DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH* , 1984 .